Until gcc and GNUStep properly support Objective-C blocks and other
"new" features of Objective-C we can't properly support them without
making the code much more ugly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739152
It's architecture dependent and should not be placed into the include
directory as the assumption is that all those headers are architecture
independent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739767
Otherwise when resizing the window you will also get messages like:
class NSConcreteMapTable autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class NSConcreteValue autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class NSConcreteValue autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class __NSCFDictionary autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
Need to set the ':' as the reshape method now takes one parameter.
For the story, the GstGLNSView was previously inheriting from
NSOpenGLView which has a reshape function without any parameter.
Now the GstGLNSView inherits from NSView and we re-use the reshape
function manually.
Use the reshape function after being defined. The other way
would have been to declare the reshape function in the header.
gstglwindow_cocoa.m: In function '-[GstGLNSView drawRect:]':
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: 'GstGLNSView' may not respond to '-reshape'
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: (Messages without a matching method signature
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: will be assumed to return 'id' and accept
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: '...' as arguments.)
GTK-Doc uses a special syntax for code documentation. A multiline comment that
starts with an additional '*' marks a documentation block that will be processed
by the GTK-Doc tools. So GTK-Doc is confused if a comment block starts with that
additional '*' but isn't meant to be processed. Removing this additional '*'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739444
gstglwindow_cocoa.m: In function '-[GstGLNSView drawRect:]':
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: 'GstGLNSView' may not respond to '-reshape'
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: (Messages without a matching method signature
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: will be assumed to return 'id' and accept
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: '...' as arguments.)
Using NSApp directly seems to confuse something, as the compiler
was expecting an id<NSFileManagerDelegate>. Switched to using
[NSApplication sharedApplication], and specified the delegate
protocol on the window class as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738740
- The shader was outputing the wrong values compared with raw
videotestsrc.
- deal with the texture edge properly.
- properly sample the 2x1 rectangle for the u and v values
- don't double sample the y value
The visible rect and bounds might be the same as before, but Cocoa
might've changed our viewport without us nothing. This happens if
you hide the view and show it again.
This is only for non-Cocoa apps but previously caused a 2 second
waiting during startup for Cocoa apps. This is unacceptable.
Instead we now check a bit more extensive if something actually
runs on the GLib default main context, and if not don't even
bother waiting for something to happen from there.
Otherwise we could pass on a RGBA formatted buffer and downstream would
misinterpret that as some other video format.
Fixes pipelines of the form
gleffects ! tee ! xvimagesink
Allows callers to properly reference count the buffers used for
rendering.
Fixes a redraw race in glimagesink where the previous buffer
(the one used for redraw operations) is freed as soon as the next
buffer is uploaded.
1. glimagesink uploads in _prepare() to texture n
1.1 glupload holds buffer n
2. glimagesink _render()s texture n
3. glimagesink uploads texture n+1
3.1 glupload free previous buffer which deletes texture n
3.2 glupload holds buffer n+1
4. glwindow resize/expose
5. glimagesink redraws with texture n
The race is that the buffer n (the one used for redrawing) is freed as soon as
the buffer n+1 arrives. There could be any amount of time and number of
redraws between this event and when buffer n+1 is actually rendered and thus
replaces buffer n as the redraw source.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736740
This thread dispatches navigation events. It is needed to avoid deadlocks
between window backend threads that emit navigation events (e.g. X11/GMainLoop
thread) and consumers of navigation events such as glimagesink, see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733661
GstGlWindow_x11 thread is changed to invoke the navigation thread for navigation
dispatching, instead of emiting the event itself. Othe backends beside X11 do
not dispatch navigation events yet, but should use this thread when dispatching
these events in the future.
The navigation thread is currently part of GstGLWindow and not implemented in
separate subclasses / backends. This will be needed in the future.
gst_gl_window_x11_get_surface_dimensions is also changed to use a cached value
of the window's width, height. These values are now retrieved in the X11
thread, function gst_gl_window_x11_handle_event. This change is needed because
otherwise the XGetWindowAttributes gets called from the navigation thread,
leading to xlib aborting due to multithreaded access (if XInitThreads is not
called before, as is the case for gst-launch)
EGL_CONTEXT_FLAGS_KHR and EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_DEBUG_BIT_KHR
don't exist in the Android NDK. Wrap their usage in an #ifdef
EGL_KHR_create_context to fix the build there.
The text for EGL_KHR_create_context added the possiblity for ES
contexts to ask for a debug context however that has not been
fully realized by all implementations. Fallback to a non-debug
context when the implementation errors.
If window is resized, GstStructure pointer values have to be rescaled to
original geometry. A get_surface_dimensions GLWindow class method is added for
this purpose and used in the navigation send_event function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703486
Certain elements expect that there be a certain number of lines
that they can write into. e.g. for odd heights, I420, YV12, NV12,
NV21 (and others) Y lines are expected to have exactly twice the
number of U/UV lines.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733717
