Redirection messages are already used in fragmented sources and in
uridecodebin, so it makes sense to introduce these as an official message
type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631673
We don't do calculations with different units (buffer offsets and bytes)
anymore but have functions for:
1) getting the number of bytes since the last discont
2) getting the offset (and pts/dts) at the last discont
and the previously added function to get the last offset and its distance from
the current adapter position.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766647
API: gst_buffer_prev_offset
API: gst_buffer_get_offset_from_discont
The gst_buffer_get_offset_from_discont() method allows retrieving the current
offset based on the GST_BUFFER_OFFSET of the buffers that were pushed in.
The offset will be set initially by the GST_BUFFER_OFFSET of
DISCONT buffers, and then incremented by the sizes of the following
buffers.
The gst_buffer_prev_offset() method allows retrievent the previous
GST_BUFFER_OFFSET regardless of flags. It works in the same way as
the other gst_buffer_prev_*() methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766647
It is better to have separate tests:
1) the test name will tell what is broekn when the test fails
2) we still run the other tests when one assert fails
3) the tests are easier to understand
4) we don't rely on sie effect of previous actions
5) ...
Also ix the assertion message for the name checks (Gst -> fakeobject).
GObject allow calling g_object_notify() within set_property() and
won't notify it twice. As it was raised during review, add a unit test to
make sure.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766923
This means applications and bin sub-classes can easily track when
a new child element is added to the pipeline sub-hierarchy or
removed.
Currently doesn't signal deep added/removed for elements inside
a bin if a bin is added/removed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578933
gst_check_setup_sink_pad() internally uses gst_check_chain_func() so we
should call gst_check_drop_buffers() when tearing down tests to free the
buffers which have been exchanged through the pipeline.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765903
The test rely on bus being flushed when setting the bin to the NULL state which
is not the case. This apply only when setting the pipeline state to
NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765720
This ensures the following special case is handled properly:
1. Queue is empty
2. Data is pushed, fill level is below the current high-threshold
3. high-threshold is set to a level that is below the current fill level
Since mq->percent wasn't being recalculated in step #3 properly, this
caused the multiqueue to switch off its buffering state when new data is
pushed in, and never post a 100% buffering message. The application will
have received a <100% buffering message from step #2, but will never see
100%.
Fix this by recalculating the current fill level percentage during
high-threshold property changes in the same manner as it is done when
use-buffering is modified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763757
We need to clear some global state and register a new test
basetransform subclass for each test because we do things
in class_init base on global state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=623469
The test assumed that if a buffer has the same pointer address as
before it is in fact the same mini object and has been re-used by
the pool. This seems to be mostly true, but not always. The buffer
might be destroyed and when a new buffer is created the allocator
might return the same memory that we just freed.
Instead attach a qdata with destroy notify function to buffer
instances we want to track to make sure the buffer actually
gets finalized rather than resurrected and put back into the pool.
Be notified in the application thread via bus messages about
notify::* and deep-notify::* property changes, instead of
having to deal with it in a non-application thread.
API: gst_element_add_property_notify_watch()
API: gst_element_add_property_deep_notify_watch()
API: gst_element_remove_property_notify_watch()
API: gst_message_new_property_notify()
API: gst_message_parse_property_notify()
API: GST_MESSAGE_PROPERTY_NOTIFY
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763142
Checking the current element's state when we're adding pads to
the parent element is checking the wrong thing.
Silences a 'attempting to add an inactive pad to a running element'
warning when adding a ghost pad to a running parent bin of the parent
bin of the element.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764176
This takes readings in the form of ...
<local_1> <remote_1> <remote_2> <local_2>
... with one observation per line, and then replays it using the
netclientclock code.
The output is the statistics structure emitted by the netclientclock,
which can then be analysed and tuned once we get those readings for
potential edge-cases.
It should be possible to find some inputs with "bad" data and convert
this into a unit test for future tweaks to run against.
