No-one's using/depending on it (it would have criticalled and not worked)
and it's causing more problems than it's solving. Store the GMainContext
in the public struct instead for subclasses to optionally use instead of
relying on the push/pop state to be correct.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775970
This is potentially racy (in the unlikely scenario that we get two
first-time calls to gst_player_error_quark() at the same time). This
should not impact anything in terms of performance since it's only on
the error path.
The call itself could just be inlined by making GST_PLAYER_ERROR be
defined to the g_quark_from_static_string() call, but this feels ugly
from an API perspective.
If a sub class of GstGLContext does not create a group
then it currently crashes:
0 g_atomic_int_get (&share->refcount)
1 _context_share_group_is_shared (context->priv->sharegroup)
2 gst_gl_context_is_shared
3 _default_set_sync_gl
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774518
This is a subblass of VideoFilter but yet does not use any of it's
features. This also fixes issue in case the incoming images have custom
strides as the VideoMeta is no longer ignored.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775288
When a MSS server hosts a live stream the fragments listed in the
manifest usually don't have accurate timestamps and duration, except
for the first fragment, which additionally stores timing information
for the few upcoming fragments. In this scenario it is useless to
periodically fetch and update the manifest and the fragments list can
be incrementally built by parsing the first/current fragment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755036
Calling g_main_context_push_thread and then g_main_context_invoke()
(used by gst_gl_window_send_message_async()) in the same thread will
cause the invoked function to run immediately instead of being delayed.
This had implications for the creation of the OpenGL context not waiting
until the main loop had completely started up and as a result would
sometimes deadlock in short create/destroy scenarios.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775171
626bcccff9 removed some locks that
allowed the main loop quit to occur before the context was fully
created.
2776cef25d attempted to readd them but
missed the scop of the quit() call.
Also remove the use of g_thread_join() as that's not safe to use when
it's possible to lose the last reference from the GL thread.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775171
The smallest section ever needs to be at least 3 bytes (i.e. just the short
header).
Non-short headers need to be at least 11 bytes long (3 for the minimum header,
5 for the non-short header, and 4 for the CRC).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775048
It's been removed and thus compiling anything against GstGLMemoryEGL
would error with:
In file included from gstomxvideodec.c:41:0:
usr/include/gstreamer-1.0/gst/gl/egl/gstglmemoryegl.h:32:41: fatal error: gst/gl/egl/gstglcontext_egl.h: No such file or directory
#include <gst/gl/egl/gstglcontext_egl.h>
^
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774886
Otherwise, when the application reuses the same UIView, we were getting
draw notifications on the previous view/layer's which weren't valid anymore
and were referencing pointers that had been freed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753003
This changes the failure case to require a consecutive number of
failures rather than being spread out over the entire stream.
Fixes the case where fetching the manifest was intermittent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774177
For formats that need to update the manifest to know about new
fragments as they're being written by the server would never receive an
updated fragment list after a seek event
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774177
- xcb is supposedly thread-safe!
videotestsrc ! glimagesink now doesn't spuriously result in a
'call XInitThreads()' error however if anybody else is using X11,
then XInitThreads() still needs to be called and multiple glimagesink's
still need XInitThreads().
Everything still takes libX11 handles as they are compatible with the xcb
variants. Unfortunately we cannot move fully over to xcb due to GLX being
entirely based on Xlib. It's also impossible to transform a xcb_connection
to a Display which means we require X11 handles.
The spec allows the core/compatibility profiles to be used
with #version 150.
Also tighten up the tests to check for default profiles being chosen
correctly.
The change to use GST_EXPORT for symbols under Windows requires
GST_EXPORTS for internal use, and that is also needed under Autotools.
The same thing is done for gstreamer-1.0.dll in -core.
The calling convention may be deprecated, but we still need it for
OpenGL. The build issue was caused by an incorrect syntax being used for
the WINAPI (__stdcall) prototype in function pointers which was accepted
by GCC but is rejected by MSVC.
With MSVC, this gives the following warning:
warning C4305: 'function': truncation from 'double' to 'gfloat'
Apparently, MSVC does not figure out what type to use for constants
based on the assignment. This warning is very spammy, so let's try to
fix it.
At minimum, we only need to glFlush() if we are in a shared GL context
environment. Move the glFinish() to when the actual wait is requested
which may be never. Improves the throughput on older GL systems without
GL3/GLES3 and/or fence sync objects.
In order to calculate the *actual* bitrate for downloading a fragment
we need to take into account the time since we requested the fragment.
Without this, the bitrate calculations (previously reported by queue2)
would be biased since they wouldn't take into account the request latency
(that is the time between the moment we request a specific URI and the
moment we receive the first byte of that request).
Such examples were it would be biased would be high-bandwith but high-latency
networks. If you download 5MB in 500ms, but it takes 200ms to get the first
byte, queue2 would report 80Mbit/s (5Mb in 500ms) , but taking the request
into account it is only 57Mbit/s (5Mb in 700ms).
While this would not cause too much issues if the above fragment represented
a much longer duration (5s of content), it would cause issues with short
ones (say 1s, or when doing keyframe-only requests which are even shorter)
where the code would expect to be able to download up to 80Mbit/s ... whereas
if we take the request time into account it's much lower (and we would
therefore end up doing late requests).
Also calculate the request latency for debugging purposes and further
usage (it could allow us to figure out the maximum request rate for
example).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733959https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772330
