Check that end_of_seq() [EOSEQ] and end_of_stream [EOS] NAL units
are correctly parsed and the reported NAL unit size yields 1 byte,
i.e. the only NalHeaderBytes in there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732553
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Check that conversion to byte-stream/au formats work and that we
can effectively drop broken/invalid NAL units from the resulting
access unit buffer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732203
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
If an SEI NAL unit with a buffering_period() message is inserted
between an SPS and PPS NAL unit, check that the output buffer still
contain it. i.e. make sure that this SEI message is not dropped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732156
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Always use a GstAdapter when collecting access units (alignment="au")
in either byte-stream or avcC format. This is required to properly
preserve config headers like SPS and PPS when invalid or broken NAL
units are subsequently parsed.
More precisely, this fixes scenario like:
<SPS> <PPS> <invalid-NAL> <slice>
where we used to reset the output frame buffer when an invalid or
broken NAL is parsed, i.e. SPS and PPS NAL units were lost, thus
preventing the next slice unit to be decoded, should this also
represent any valid data.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732203
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Carefully track cases when skipping broken or invalid NAL units is
necessary. In particular, always allow NAL units to be processed
and let that gst_h264_parse_process_nal() function decide on whether
the current NAL needs to be dropped or not.
This fixes parsing of streams with SEI NAL buffering_period() message
inserted between SPS and PPS, or SPS-Ext NAL following a traditional
SPS NAL unit, among other cases too.
Practical examples from the H.264 AVC conformance suite include
alphaconformanceG, CVSE2_Sony_B, CVSE3_Sony_H, CVSEFDFT3_Sony_E
when parsing in stream-format=byte-stream,alignment=au mode.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732203
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Improve parser state tracking by introducing new flags reflecting
it: "got-sps", "got-pps" and "got-slice". This is an addition for
robustness purposes.
Older have_sps and have_pps variables are kept because they have
a different meaning. i.e. they are used for deciding on when to
submit updated caps or not, and rather mean "have new SPS/PPS to
be submitted?"
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Use gst_h264_parser_identify_nalu_unchecked() to identify the next
NAL unit. We don't want to parse the full NAL unit, but only the
header bytes and possibly the first RBSP byte for identifying the
first_mb_in_slice syntax element.
Also fix check for failure when returning from that function. The
only success condition for that is GST_H264_PARSER_OK, so use it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732154
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
Fix documentation for GstH264NalUnit. The @ref_idc part was totally
unbalanced. Also add a note about @offset and @size fields to remind
that this is relative to the start of the NAL unit, thus including
the header bytes.
An end_of_seq() [EOSEQ] or end_of_stream() [EOS] NAL unit is really
one byte long because this shall include the NalHeaderBytes (1) too.
The NALU.offset starts from the first byte of the header.
This is the proper fix to commit d37f842. In practice, this fixes
parsing of FRExt1_Panasonic_D and FRExt2_Panasonic_C, that include
additional frames after an EOSEQ.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732553
Signed-off-by: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne@intel.com>
The pixel buffer release callback is called if the void *
dataPtr given to the CVPixelBufferCreateWithPlanarBytes
is not NULL.
According to the documentation dataPtr is supposed to be a
"plane description block" but no specific type is given.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711847