It's usually not a problem if a query fails if there's no peer,
especially as it will happen during pad linking (caps query)
quite often and spams the logs.
gst_base_src_start_complete() can fail when the thread could not be
started, for example. Make sure it causes the state change to fail by
retrieving the result from _start_complete().
If we try to push sticky events but a probe dropped them, we don't mark
the event as received and mark the pad as PENDING_EVENTS. This ensures
that we resend the event the next time. For this we need to let the
custom flow return from the probe trickle up to
gst_pad_push_event_unchecked() so that we can differentiate between
OK and DROPPED probe returns.
Basetransform should not try to negotiate in passthrough mode but
respect the order of what we return in the transform_caps method.
A typical case is that you specify some specific new caps in the
caps property but also allow the current caps to pass.
Basetransform attempts to do passthrough mode regardless of the order of
the transform_caps method. Add a method to disable this.
This is needed for elements like capsfilter that want to transform caps
based on the order of the caps property.
First check that we can actually register the implementation before
making a GstMetaInfo. If we can't register we would otherwise end
up with an undefined type and an invalid GstMetaInfo.
It's possible that type registration fails because another metadata
with the same implementation name was already registered.
The 3rd parameter of gst_base_src_new_seamless_segment in
0.10 is the time associated with the start of the new segment,
not the position in the new segment. Fix the name of the parameter,
the docs, and the implementation to match the needs of the only
extant consumer: DVD playback.
Fixes negotiation taking a ridiculous amount of
time (multiple 10s of seconds on a core2) when
there are duplicate entries in lists.
Could have a negative performance impact on other
scenarios because we now have to iterate the
dest list to avoid duplicates, but we don't
have a lot of lists any more these days, and
they tend to be small anyway. The negatives
are hopefully countered by the positive effects
of reducing the list length early on in the
process. And in any case, it's the right thing
to do.
Based on patch by Andre Moreira Magalhaes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684981
