This is the first step towards support for multiple forges (#138). It
inserts a forge using the currently existing env varaibles into db and
uses this forge from db later on in all places of the code.
closes#621
addresses #138
# TODO
- [x] add forges table
- [x] add id of forge to repo
- [x] use forge of repo
- [x] add forge from env vars to db if not exists
- [x] migrate repo.ForgeID to the newly generated forge
- [x] support cache with forge from repo
- [x] maybe add forge loading cache? (use LRU cache for forges, I expect
users to have less than 10 forges normally)
---------
Co-authored-by: qwerty287 <80460567+qwerty287@users.noreply.github.com>
…but if they're enabled, allow for all events. Also add warning that you
should only enable it if you trust the users with push access.
closes#3559
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Kaussow <xoxys@rknet.org>
fixes#3389
Set variable to let server detect if it's deployed within a container
image.
Set the default database connection based on this.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Anbraten <6918444+anbraten@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull-requests re-introduces the Bitbucket Server support with a
more or less complete rewrite of the forge implementation. We have a lot
of on-premises git repositories hosted in Bitbucket Server and need a CI
solution for running that and Woodpecker looks promising.
The implementation is based on external Bitbucket Server REST client
library which we are maintaining and have created in another context.
Besides the original support for Bitbucket the re-implementation also
adds support for handling Bitbucket pull-request events.
Closes https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/discussions/2174
- return bad habit error if no event filter is set
- If this is applied, it's useless to allow `exclude`s on events.
Therefore, deprecate it together with `include`s which should be
replaced by `base.StringOrSlice` later.
Mostly those that did not require much work.
From #2960
---------
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
As of #2520
Support to load new forges and agent backends at runtime using go's
plugin system. (https://pkg.go.dev/plugin)
I also added a simple example addon (a new forge which just prints log
statements), it should be removed later of course, but you can see an
example.
---------
Co-authored-by: Michalis Zampetakis <mzampetakis@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anbraten <anton@ju60.de>
https://go.dev/doc/modules/release-workflow#breaking
Fixes https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2913 fixes
#2654
```
runephilosof@fedora:~/code/platform-woodpecker/woodpecker-repo-configurator (master)$ go get go.woodpecker-ci.org/woodpecker@v2.0.0
go: go.woodpecker-ci.org/woodpecker@v2.0.0: invalid version: module contains a go.mod file, so module path must match major version ("go.woodpecker-ci.org/woodpecker/v2")
```
---------
Co-authored-by: qwerty287 <80460567+qwerty287@users.noreply.github.com>
implement this fix but with an additional field on workflows to not
change the workflow name
closes#1840closes#713
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
if you run woodpecker-agent on windows and connect it to an docker
daemon, there could be two different platforms possible, as you can
switch from linux to windows mode and visa versa
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
The SSH backend is, similar to Gogs and Coding for forges, completely
unmaintained and seems unused (it is likely broken but we didn't get any
reports).
Instead, you should directly run the agent on the SSH machine with the
`local` backend.
- refactor pipeline parsing
- do not parse the pipeline multiple times to perform filter checks, do
this once and perform checks on the result directly
- code deduplication
- refactor forge token refreshing
- move refreshing to a helper func to reduce code
---------
Co-authored-by: Anbraten <anton@ju60.de>
I had experienced some issues running Woodpecker behind a reverse-proxy,
resulting from not defining the `WOODPECKER_ROOT_PATH` environment
variable in #2477.
As suggested by @qwerty287, specifying `WOODPECKER_ROOT_PATH=/foo`
*mostly* solved the issue of running the woodpecker server at an url
like `https://example.org/foo`.
However, the webhook urls and badge urls were generated excluding the
configured `WOODPECKER_ROOT_PATH`.
This PR (mostly) fixes issues related to non-empty
`WOODPECKER_ROOT_PATH`.
---------
Co-authored-by: qwerty287 <80460567+qwerty287@users.noreply.github.com>
close#2079
as we sett the global vars **after** migrations we did never had a
chance to propagate a **true** in WOODPECKER_MIGRATIONS_ALLOW_LONG to
the migrations ...
---------
Co-authored-by: qwerty287 <80460567+qwerty287@users.noreply.github.com>
closes#1743
fixes: setting secrets for own user namespace
- create org in database
- use orgID for org related APIs
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
This PR introduces two new server configuration options, for providing a
custom .JS and .CSS file.
These can be used to show custom banner messages, add
environment-dependent signals, or simply a corporate logo.
### Motivation (what problem I try to solve)
I'm operating Woodpecker in multiple k8s clusters for different
environments.
When having multiple browser tabs open, I prefer strong indicators for
each environment.
E.g. a red "PROD" banner, or just a blue "QA" banner.
Also, we sometimes need to have the chance for maintenance, and instead
of broadcasting emails,
I prefer a banner message, stating something like: "Heads-up: there's a
planned downtime, next Friday, blabla...".
Also, I like to have the firm's logo visible, which makes Woodpecker
look more like an integral part of our platform.
### Implementation notes
* Two new config options are introduced ```WOODPECKER_CUSTOM_CSS_FILE```
and ```WOODPECKER_CUSTOM_JS_FILE```
* I've piggy-bagged the existing handler for assets, as it seemed to me
a minimally invasive approach
* the option along with an example is documented
* a simple unit test for the Gin-handler ensures some regression safety
* no extra dependencies are introduced
### Visual example
The documented example will look like this.
### Areas of uncertainty
This is my first contribution to Woodpecker and I tried my best to align
with your conventions.
That said, I found myself uncertain about these things and would be glad
about getting feedback.
* The handler tests are somewhat different than the other ones because I
wanted to keep them simple - I hope that still matches your coding
guidelines
* caching the page sometimes will let the browser not recognize changes
and a user must reload. I'm not fully into the details of how caching is
implemented and neither can judge if it's a real problem. Another pair
of eyes would be good.
