mirror of
https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker.git
synced 2024-12-31 20:58:43 +00:00
Add continous deployment cookbook (#3098)
Supersedes https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/2019 --------- Co-authored-by: lonix1 <40320097+lonix1@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6b98cf95e
commit
7786028b4a
1 changed files with 52 additions and 0 deletions
52
docs/cookbook/2024-1-1-continous-deployment/index.md
Normal file
52
docs/cookbook/2024-1-1-continous-deployment/index.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Continuous Deployment
|
||||
description: Deploy your artifacts to an app server
|
||||
slug: continuous-deployment
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
- name: lonix1
|
||||
url: https://github.com/lonix1
|
||||
image_url: https://github.com/lonix1.png
|
||||
hide_table_of_contents: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!--truncate-->
|
||||
|
||||
A typical CI pipeline contains steps such as: _clone_, _build_, _test_, _package_ and _push_. The final build product may be artifacts pushed to a git repository or a docker container pushed to a container registry.
|
||||
|
||||
When these should be deployed on an app server, the pipeline should include a _deploy_ step, which represents the "CD" in CI/CD - the automatic deployment of a pipeline's final product.
|
||||
|
||||
There are various ways to accomplish CD with Woodpecker, depending on your project's specific needs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invoking deploy script via SSH
|
||||
|
||||
The final step in your pipeline could SSH into the app server and run a deployment script.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the benefits would be that the deployment script's output could be included in the pipeline's log. However in general, this is a complicated option as it tightly couples the CI and app servers.
|
||||
|
||||
An SSH step could be written by using a plugin, like [ssh](https://plugins.drone.io/plugins/ssh) or [git push](https://woodpecker-ci.org/plugins/Git%20Push).
|
||||
|
||||
## Polling for asset changes
|
||||
|
||||
This option completely decouples the CI and app servers, and there is no explicit deploy step in the pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
On the app server, one should create a script or cron job that polls for asset changes (every minute, say). When a new version is detected, the script redeploys the app.
|
||||
|
||||
This option is easy to maintain, but the downside is a short delay (one minute) before new assets are detected.
|
||||
|
||||
## Using a configuration management tool
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using a configuration management tool (e.g. Ansible, Chef, Puppet), then you could setup the last pipeline step to call that tool to perform the redeployment.
|
||||
|
||||
A plugin for [Ansible](https://woodpecker-ci.org/plugins/Ansible) exists and could be adapted accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
This option is complex and only suitable in an environment in which you're already using configuration management.
|
||||
|
||||
## Using webhooks (recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
If your forge (GitHub, GitLab, Gitea, etc.) supports webhooks, then you could create a separate listening app that receives a webhook when new assets are available and redeploys your app.
|
||||
|
||||
The listening "app" can be something as simple as a PHP script.
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatively, there are a number of popular webhook servers that simplify this process, so you only need to write your actual deployment script. For example, [webhook](https://github.com/adnanh/webhook) and [webhookd](https://github.com/ncarlier/webhookd).
|
||||
|
||||
This is arguably the simplest and most maintainable solution.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue