2024-06-06 13:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// cSpell:ignore Segoe Roboto Neue Noto nocheck
|
|
|
|
/* eslint-disable ts/no-unsafe-member-access, ts/no-unsafe-assignment, ts/no-unsafe-argument, ts/no-unsafe-return */
|
|
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line ts/ban-ts-comment
|
|
|
|
// @ts-nocheck
|
|
|
|
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
import tinycolor from 'tinycolor2';
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
import colors from 'windicss/colors';
|
|
|
|
import { defineConfig } from 'windicss/helpers';
|
|
|
|
import typography from 'windicss/plugin/typography';
|
|
|
|
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
const customColors = {
|
|
|
|
'wp-primary': {
|
|
|
|
100: '#8AD97F',
|
|
|
|
200: '#68C464',
|
|
|
|
300: '#4CAF50',
|
|
|
|
400: '#369943',
|
|
|
|
500: '#248438',
|
|
|
|
600: '#166E30',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-secondary': {
|
|
|
|
200: '#434858',
|
|
|
|
300: '#383C4A',
|
|
|
|
400: '#303440',
|
|
|
|
500: '#2D313D',
|
|
|
|
600: '#2A2E3A',
|
|
|
|
700: '#222631',
|
|
|
|
800: '#1B1F28',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2024-06-06 13:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/* eslint-disable ts/no-unsafe-call */
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
export default defineConfig({
|
|
|
|
darkMode: 'class',
|
|
|
|
theme: {
|
|
|
|
extend: {
|
|
|
|
colors: {
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
// Internals to keep a single source for color definitions
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-primary': {
|
|
|
|
100: customColors['wp-primary'][100],
|
|
|
|
200: customColors['wp-primary'][200],
|
|
|
|
300: customColors['wp-primary'][300],
|
|
|
|
400: customColors['wp-primary'][400],
|
|
|
|
500: customColors['wp-primary'][500],
|
|
|
|
600: customColors['wp-primary'][600],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-secondary': {
|
|
|
|
200: customColors['wp-secondary'][200],
|
|
|
|
300: customColors['wp-secondary'][300],
|
|
|
|
400: customColors['wp-secondary'][400],
|
|
|
|
500: customColors['wp-secondary'][500],
|
|
|
|
600: customColors['wp-secondary'][600],
|
|
|
|
700: customColors['wp-secondary'][700],
|
|
|
|
800: customColors['wp-secondary'][800],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-neutral': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.white,
|
|
|
|
200: colors.gray[300],
|
|
|
|
300: colors.gray[400],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-info': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.cyan[700],
|
|
|
|
200: colors.cyan[800],
|
|
|
|
300: colors.cyan[900],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-info-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.cyan[700]).desaturate(30).toString(),
|
|
|
|
200: tinycolor(colors.cyan[800]).desaturate(30).toString(),
|
|
|
|
300: tinycolor(colors.cyan[900]).desaturate(30).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-ok': {
|
|
|
|
100: customColors['wp-primary'][400],
|
|
|
|
200: customColors['wp-primary'][500],
|
|
|
|
300: customColors['wp-primary'][600],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-ok-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(customColors['wp-primary'][400]).desaturate(10).toString(),
|
|
|
|
200: tinycolor(customColors['wp-primary'][500]).desaturate(10).toString(),
|
|
|
|
300: tinycolor(customColors['wp-primary'][600]).desaturate(10).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-error': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.red[700],
|
|
|
|
200: colors.red[800],
|
|
|
|
300: colors.red[900],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-control-error-dark': {
|
2023-11-09 21:00:52 +00:00
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.red[700]).desaturate(25).toString(),
|
|
|
|
200: tinycolor(colors.red[800]).desaturate(25).toString(),
|
|
|
|
300: tinycolor(colors.red[900]).desaturate(25).toString(),
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-error': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.red[700],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-error-dark': {
|
2023-11-09 21:00:52 +00:00
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.red[700]).desaturate(25).toString(),
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-neutral': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.gray[600],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-ok': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.green[600],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-ok-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.green[600]).desaturate(20).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-info': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.cyan[600],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-info-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.cyan[600]).desaturate(20).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-warn': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.yellow[400],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-state-warn-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.yellow[400]).desaturate(20).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-hint-warn': {
|
|
|
|
100: colors.yellow[100],
|
|
|
|
200: colors.yellow[300],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'int-wp-hint-warn-dark': {
|
|
|
|
100: tinycolor(colors.yellow[300]).desaturate(60).toString(),
|
|
|
|
200: tinycolor(colors.yellow[500]).desaturate(60).toString(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Theme colors
|
|
|
|
'wp-background': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-background-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-background-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-background-300)',
|
|
|
|
400: 'var(--wp-background-400)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-text': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-text-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-text-200)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-text-alt': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-text-alt-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-primary': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-primary-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-primary-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-primary-300)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-primary-text': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-primary-text-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-control-neutral': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-control-neutral-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-control-neutral-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-control-neutral-300)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-control-info': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-control-info-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-control-info-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-control-info-300)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-control-ok': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-control-ok-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-control-ok-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-control-ok-300)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-control-error': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-control-error-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-control-error-200)',
|
|
|
|
300: 'var(--wp-control-error-300)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-state-error': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-state-error-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-state-neutral': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-state-neutral-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-state-ok': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-state-ok-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-state-info': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-state-info-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-state-warn': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-state-warn-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-hint-warn': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-hint-warn-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-hint-warn-200)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-code': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-code-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-code-200)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
'wp-code-text': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-code-text-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
2023-08-02 08:36:14 +00:00
|
|
|
'wp-code-text-alt': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-code-text-alt-100)',
|
|
|
|
},
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'wp-link': {
|
|
|
|
100: 'var(--wp-link-100)',
|
|
|
|
200: 'var(--wp-link-200)',
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-10-21 20:09:36 +00:00
|
|
|
transitionProperty: {
|
|
|
|
height: 'max-height',
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
stroke: (theme) => theme('colors'),
|
|
|
|
fill: (theme) => theme('colors'),
|
2022-10-23 02:33:39 +00:00
|
|
|
fontFamily: [
|
|
|
|
'system-ui',
|
|
|
|
'-apple-system',
|
|
|
|
'Segoe UI',
|
|
|
|
'Roboto',
|
|
|
|
'Helvetica Neue',
|
|
|
|
'Noto Sans',
|
|
|
|
'Liberation Sans',
|
|
|
|
'Arial',
|
|
|
|
'sans-serif',
|
|
|
|
],
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-11-18 07:10:43 +00:00
|
|
|
shortcuts: {
|
|
|
|
'hover-effect':
|
|
|
|
'hover:bg-black hover:bg-opacity-10 dark:hover:bg-white dark:hover:bg-opacity-5 transition-colors duration-100',
|
|
|
|
},
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
plugins: [typography()],
|
2021-11-03 16:40:31 +00:00
|
|
|
});
|