2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
### IDEs ###
|
|
|
|
.idea/
|
2021-12-21 03:45:41 +00:00
|
|
|
.vscode/*
|
2021-12-21 09:52:10 +00:00
|
|
|
!.vscode/settings.json
|
2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
!.vscode/launch.json
|
2021-12-21 03:45:41 +00:00
|
|
|
!.vscode/extensions.json
|
2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### GO ###
|
|
|
|
# Binaries for programs and plugins
|
|
|
|
*.exe
|
|
|
|
*.exe~
|
|
|
|
*.dll
|
|
|
|
*.so
|
|
|
|
*.dylib
|
2022-06-16 23:57:02 +00:00
|
|
|
vendor/
|
2022-06-17 14:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
__debug_bin
|
2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test binary, built with `go test -c`
|
|
|
|
*.test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Output of the go coverage tool, specifically when used with LiteIDE
|
|
|
|
*.out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Frontend ###
|
2021-09-29 15:34:56 +00:00
|
|
|
web/dist/**
|
|
|
|
!web/dist/.gitkeep
|
|
|
|
web/node_modules/
|
2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
web/*.log
|
|
|
|
web/.env
|
Use consistent woodpecker color scheme (#2003)
Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/a254f1e0-ce17-43a9-9e8b-72252296fd6f)
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/7bf751e1-f2a6-481c-bee7-a27d27cf8adb)
![image](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/assets/3391958/e5673dc7-81c1-4fd4-bef9-14494bc5aa27)
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-08-02 07:09:12 +00:00
|
|
|
.pnpm-store
|
2021-06-22 10:34:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Docker ###
|
|
|
|
docker-compose.yml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Other ##
|
|
|
|
# runetime or build relicts
|
2014-02-07 10:10:01 +00:00
|
|
|
*.sqlite
|
2015-09-30 01:21:17 +00:00
|
|
|
*.out
|
2019-04-26 11:46:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/.env
|
2017-05-08 00:01:04 +00:00
|
|
|
extras/
|
2021-09-21 14:36:41 +00:00
|
|
|
/build/
|
2021-10-04 17:50:21 +00:00
|
|
|
/dist/
|
2015-10-23 00:03:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-11-13 11:23:16 +00:00
|
|
|
docs/venv
|
2022-01-24 10:41:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# helm charts
|
|
|
|
.cr-index/
|
|
|
|
.cr-release-packages/
|
2022-09-27 20:19:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Generated by CI ###
|
|
|
|
docs/docs/40-cli.md
|
2023-06-04 03:07:39 +00:00
|
|
|
docs/swagger.json
|