events_foreach adds an extra ref when giving the event to the
user function. In case it was unrefed by the user, this extra ref
disappeared, but events_foreach still should unref again to
lose its own ref before removing the event from the array.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722467
This allows blocking a pad, add a new blocking probe, removing
the first probe and then having the second probe called. Which
could then decide that data-flow should actually continue
instead of blocking now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721289
Also only check the data types for non-IDLE probes. When we
are idle, we have no data type obviously.
Previously we were calling IDLE probes during data flow whenever
a non-blocking probe would be called. The pad was usually not idle
at that time.
Make a new flag on the pad that tweaks the default behaviour of the
accept-caps function. By default it will check for a subset of the
query-caps result but this is not always desirable. The query-caps
result contains all the constraints to make a good caps decision
upstream but sometimes, like for parsers, not all the constrained caps
fields are known upstream and then a subset check would fail. Switching
to an intersection makes this work again.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705024https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677401
* fix typo GstBufferFlag -> GstBufferFlags
* fix typo GstFeatures -> GstCapsFeatures
* fix typo GstAllocatorParams -> GstAllocationParams
* fix typo GstContrlSources -> GstControlSource
* do not refer to gstcheck as an object
* make references gtk_init() and tcase_set_timeout() not be references
* gst_element_get_pad() renamed gst_element_get_static_pad()
* gst_clock_id_wait_async_full() renamed gst_clock_id_wait_async()
* _drop_element() is really gst_queue_array_drop_element()
* gst_pad_accept_caps() was removed, do not refer to it
* separate GST_META_TAG_MEMORY_STR declaration from description
* do not describe removed gst_collect_pads_collect()
* correctly link to GstElementClass' virtual set_context()
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719614
Renegotiation and reconfiguration will fail because all queries
and events won't be accepted by the pad if it's flushing. In the
best case this just causes unneeded work and spurious warnings in
the debug logs, in the worst case it causes elements to fail completely.
But do this only for events that are not dropped by flushing,
i.e. do it only for everything except SEGMENT and EOS.
Without this we might drop a CAPS event if flushing happens
at an unfortunate time and nobody is resending the CAPS event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700806
If a pad block was triggered from sending a sticky event downstream, it
could happen that the pad block is relinking pads, which then requires
to resend previous sticky events.
Previous patch was inforcing a complete ordering of the sticky events, while
in fact, only STREAM_START, CAPS and SEGMENT events need proper ordering.
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688188
We can prevent buggy element from causing other elements to fail or crash
by sorting sticky event at insertion. In this case, we also warn as this
is not supposed to happen.
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688188
When flushing, it is expected that upstream will send a SEGMENT
event afterwards.
This also avoids stray SEGMENT events from coming through after a
flush.
the code ifed a debug statement, that can't be right. anyway, the way it is,
we don't really need that branch, as we set the flag to unset only if set
(and that can't fail) hence the end result is always to unset the flag.
Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@evilgiggle.com>
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691985
It's usually not a problem if a query fails if there's no peer,
especially as it will happen during pad linking (caps query)
quite often and spams the logs.
If we try to push sticky events but a probe dropped them, we don't mark
the event as received and mark the pad as PENDING_EVENTS. This ensures
that we resend the event the next time. For this we need to let the
custom flow return from the probe trickle up to
gst_pad_push_event_unchecked() so that we can differentiate between
OK and DROPPED probe returns.
Also add test to make sure that if a pad probe is removed while it's
callback is running, the cleanup_hook isn't called again if it
returns GST_PAD_PROBE_REMOVE
