Stopping to do it at the bin description level but properly
plugging them where they are needed and cleanly ghosting the pads
where it makes most sense.
This introduces support for GES to request pads on the most upstream
element in case no static pad can be ghosted.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/187>
ges_uri_clip_asset_get_duration does not tell us what the duration in
the timeline needs to be. Especially when we have time effects, or
effects with finite max-durations. So we should no longer expect the
duration to stay the same when replacing assets. Instead, we just check
that the new max-duration would be compatible with the current in-point
(which was not checked before), and the clip would not be totally
overlapped if its duration-limit changes.
This is based on the assumption that each source is replaced one-to-one
in its track. If a source is replaced with nothing in the same track,
this check may be a little too strong (but still mostly weaker than
before). However, problems could occur if track selection does
something unexpected, such as placing the new source in a track not
previously occupied.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/177>
The out-point, which is an internal time, is used instead of the
duration for determining the control binding value at the end of the
element.
Also, allow the user to switch off the auto-clamping of control sources
if they are not desired. And allow them to clamp specific control sources
individually.
Also, fix a lot of memory leaks related to control sources. In
particular, releasing the extra ref gained by source in
g_object_get (binding, "control-source", &source, NULL);
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/177>
If a layer priority sits between the priorities of two layers in the
timeline, i.e. it references a gap in the timeline's layers, then
ges_timeline_append_layer will never fill this gap and create the
desired layer, so the edit in timeline-tree would loop forever. So a
check was added to avoid this.
This would be a usage error, but a user can reasonably end up with a gap
in their layers if they remove a layer from the timeline.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/177>
Unlike ges_container_add, this lets you set the index and will check
that track selection did not fail. This is useful for time effects whose
addition would create an unsupported timeline configuration.
Also can use the clip add error in ges_timeline_add_clip to let the user
know when adding a clip to a layer that its in-point is set larger than
the max-duration of its core children.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/177>
Allow the user to register a child property of a base effect as a time
property. This can be used by GES to correctly calculate the
duration-limit of a clip when it has time effects on it. The existing
ges_effect_class_register_rate_property is now used to automatically
register such time effects for rate effects.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/177>
This was complexifying the implementation for very little gain.
Each source type should ideally have its own API.
In that patch we make it so we do not have to subclass anything
but instead use GESAsset to pass information about how the pipeline
should look like.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/175>
Otherwise there is a pretty rare race where we get the
_initialize_stack_func executed leading to the stack set up and
the source pushing buffers before the composition source pad is
activated, and a STREAM_ERROR is reported as we end up pushing a
buffer to a flushing pad.
Thanks rr chaos mode for showing that improbable race
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/175>
While this is not correct, we can't predict from what thread a
GstElement will be disposed as it might still be referenced by
a GstMessage somewhere which is freed by, any thread.
In this specific case we can assume that GES user will already have
let go his timeline reference and we should not avoid assert in that
specific case as it should be safe to let the timeline be destroyed
at that point.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/175>
Each active non-core child must have a corresponding active core child
in the same track. Therefore, if we de-activate a core child, we also
need to de-activate all the non-core children in the same track.
Similarly, if we activate a non-core child, we need to activate the
corresponding core child as well.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
Make less assumptions about the priority of effects and core elements so
that the code would still work if the priority of an element was set
directly. In particular, the index of a top effect will always be its
position in the effect ordering.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
We first change the duration of the splitted clip, then we add the new
clip to the layer and assign the tracks for its children. Normally, when
a clip is added to a layer it will have its track elements created, if
needed, and then assigned to their tracks. This will fail if any sources
would fully or triple overlap existing sources in the same track.
However, here we were adding the clip to the layer *and* avoiding the
track assignment process and instead setting the tracks explicitly. In
particular, the order was:
+ add new clip to layer with no tracks assigned
+ shrink the split clip
+ assign the tracks for the new clip
This has been changed to:
+ shrink the split clip
+ add new clip to layer with no tracks assigned
+ assign the tracks for the new clip
Thus, the order of events for any users connecting to object signals
will be close to that of adding another clip to the layer.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
Any time a track element is added to a track, we need to check whether
we need to create a new corresponding auto-transition. This simply moves
the code from ges-clip.c to ges-timeline.c, where it is more appropriate.
Moreover, it technically opens the possibility for creating
auto-transitions for track elements in the timeline that have no
corresponding clip.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
Make sure that the priority of an appended layer is the lowest (highest
in value) when appending a layer to the timeline. This change is
important when appending a layer to a timeline, which can easily have a
gap in priorities if a layer has been removed.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
These tests expose some of the new editing behaviour in timeline
tree. In particular, we test:
+ edits for clips within groups within a group
+ that an edit can succeed if a snap allows it to
+ that snapping occurs at a specific point, and that we alternate
between one call to snapping-started and one call to snapping-ended
with corresponding values
+ that an edit can fail if a snap causes it to
+ no snapping is released when an edit fails
+ We tests for the expected changes, and otherwise check that the
configuration of the timeline has remained unchanged
+ The timeline configuration remains the same when an edit fails
+ That each clip overlap has a corresponding auto-transition
+ That particular auto-transitions are created when a new overlap is
formed
+ That particular auto-transitions are destroyed when an overlap ends
+ That auto-transitions are not replaced when two clips move but
maintain their overlap
+ That the timeline does not contain any unaccounted for clips
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-editing-services/-/merge_requests/169>
