This fix a very slow rendering rate regression that only
happens when using gst-launch, i.e. in the case where
the main thread does not run any NSApp loop.
Git bisect reported it has been introduced by the commit
e10d2417e2:
"move to CGL and CAOpenGLLayer for rendering".
Then the commit 7d46357627:
"gstglwindow_cocoa: fix slow render rate" attempted to fix
the slow rendering rate problem when using gst-launch.
At least for me it does not work. I tried several
combinations, for example to flush CA transactions in the
custom app loop, as mentioned in the doc, but the only solution
that fixes the slow rendering is by reducing the loop latency.
From what I tested, no need to put less than 60ms, even if the
framerate has an interval much lower (16.6ms for 60 fps).
i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2
gstglmixer.h:43: error: redefinition of typedef ‘GstGLMixer’
gstglmixerpad.h:32: error: previous declaration of ‘GstGLMixer’ was here
gstglmixer.h:46: error: redefinition of typedef ‘GstGLMixerFrameData’
gstglmixerpad.h:33: error: previous declaration of ‘GstGLMixerFrameData’ was here
Anytime else, we have no idea how to match up map and unmaps.
We also don't know exactly how the calling code is using us.
Also fixes the case where we're trying to transfer while someone else
is accessing our data pointer or texture resulting in mismatched video
frames.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744839
One has to use the src_lock anyway to protect the min/max/live so they
can be notified atomically to the src thread to wake it up on changes,
such as property changes. So no point in having a second lock.
Also, the object lock was being held across a call to
GST_ELEMENT_WARNING, guaranteeing a deadlock.
the calculations for detecting the videomark is being repeated
in for loop unnecessarily. Moving this outside of for loop
such that the code need not be executed evertime the loop is executed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744778
While gst_aggregator_iterate_sinkpads() makes sure that every pad is only
visited once, even when the iterator has to resync, this is not all we have
to do for querying the latency. When the iterator resyncs we actually have
to query all pads for the latency again and forget our previous results. It
might have happened that a pad was removed, which influenced the result of
the latency query.
It was between another function and its helper function before, which was
confusing when reading the code as it had nothing to do with the other
functions.
Otherwise we might set bogus values or GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE.
Also make sure to reset the caps field to NULL after unreffing
the caps to prevent accidential use afterwards, and unref any
old caps before we remember new caps.
This lock is not what is commonly known as a "stream lock" in GStremer,
it's not recursive and it's taken from the non-serialized FLUSH_START event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742684
The graphene-1.0 part should not be in the source code. This directory
is part of the cflags include. This is similar to gstreamer-1.0/
directory. This break compilation if the include directory where
graphene is installed is not in your include path.
Value stored in ret will be ovewritten in the next iteration of the loop. Which
means it is never used.
Plus a style issue to make gst-indent happy and allow the commit.
Otherwise we will still have a reference to the surface left, which would
prevent activating the sink again later. E.g. after we lost the device.
Hopefully fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744615
