Reminder: the migration is run via integration tests as explained
in the commit "[DB] run all Forgejo migrations in integration tests"
(cherry picked from commit 4accf7443c)
- The current architecture is inherently insecure, because you can
construct the 'secret' cookie value with values that are available in
the database. Thus provides zero protection when a database is
dumped/leaked.
- This patch implements a new architecture that's inspired from: [Paragonie Initiative](https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies).
- Integration testing is added to ensure the new mechanism works.
- Removes a setting, because it's not used anymore.
(cherry-pick from eff097448b)
Conflicts:
modules/context/context_cookie.go
trivial context conflicts
routers/web/web.go
ctx.GetSiteCookie(setting.CookieRememberName) moved from services/auth/middleware.go
Backport #27310 by @earl-warren
- Modify the deleted branch orphan check to check for the new table
instead.
- Regression from 6e19484f4d
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1522
(cherry picked from commit c1d888686f)
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
(cherry picked from commit 2138661dae)
Backport of #27205Fixes#27174
`release` is a reserved keyword in MySql. I can't reproduce the issue on
my setup and we have a test for that code but it seems there can be
setups where it fails.
(cherry picked from commit eae6985b63)
Backport #27182 by @jolheiser
Resolves#27180
`URL` points to the API URL, `HTMLURL` points to the web page.
Notably, however, for PRs they are the same URL. I switched them to use
HTMLURL to match the rest of the codebase terminology.
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit d8583edfe7)
Backport #27126 by @Zettat123
Related to #27039
The `ref` property in Gitea Actions is different from GitHub Actions.
This PR improves the documentation to explain the difference.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7a99c7b83c)
Backport #27127 by @earl-warren
- Use the correct total amount for pagination. Thereby correctly show
the pagination bare when there's more than one page of
followers/followings.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1477
(cherry picked from commit c1a136318b)
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
(cherry picked from commit 1d6e5c8e58)
backport #26991
Unfortunately, when a system setting hasn't been stored in the database,
it cannot be cached.
Meanwhile, this PR also uses context cache for push email avatar display
which should avoid to read user table via email address again and again.
According to my local test, this should reduce dashboard elapsed time
from 150ms -> 80ms .
(cherry picked from commit 9df573bddc)
Backport #26999
If the AppURL(ROOT_URL) is an HTTPS URL, then the COOKIE_SECURE's
default value should be true.
And, if a user visits an "http" site with "https" AppURL, they won't be
able to login, and they should have been warned. The only problem is
that the "language" can't be set either in such case, while I think it
is not a serious problem, and it could be fixed easily if needed.
(cherry picked from commit b0a405c5fa)
System users (Ghost, ActionsUser, etc) have a negative id and may be
the author of a comment, either because it was created by a now
deleted user or via an action using a transient token.
The GetPossibleUserByID function has special cases related to system
users and will not fail if given a negative id.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1425
(cherry picked from commit 97667e06b3)
Backport #26883
This change was caused by #26271, for configuration as below:
```
[attachment]
ENABLE = true
PATH = data/attachments
MAX_SIZE = 100
MAX_FILES = 5
```
Before #26271, the resolved path is ${AppWorkPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/attachments`)
After #26271, the resolved path is ${AppDataPath}/${attachments.PATH}
(such as `/var/lib/gitea/data/data/attachments`)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/26864 Follow
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26271
(cherry picked from commit e15794f62f)
Backport #26813 by @JakobDev
You can currently visit `{repo}/issues/new` and create a blank issue,
even if it's disabled. This PR fixes this,
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1356
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
(cherry picked from commit 2cfabb68ff)
Backport #26664 by @CaiCandong
> ### Description
> If a new branch is pushed, and the repository has a rule that would
require signed commits for the new branch, the commit is rejected with a
500 error regardless of whether it's signed.
>
> When pushing a new branch, the "old" commit is the empty ID
(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000). verifyCommits has no
provision for this and passes an invalid commit range to git rev-list.
Prior to 1.19 this wasn't an issue because only pre-existing individual
branches could be protected.
>
> I was able to reproduce with
[try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test](https://try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test),
which is set up with a blanket rule to require commits on all branches.
Fix#25565
Very thanks to @Craig-Holmquist-NTI for reporting the bug and suggesting
an valid solution!
Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 93c36f395c)
Backport #26683 by @yp05327
Related to: #8312#26491
In migration v109, we only added a new column `CanCreateOrgRepo` in Team
table, but not initial the value of it.
This may cause bug like #26491.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit c3d323fd85)
Backport #26382 by @jolheiser
This PR adds our matrix space to the support options and alphabetizes
the list.
I also considered adding our Mastodon, however that isn't as suitable as
the other options because it's just whoever has access to the account vs
a community chat/forum.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e6173acac9)
Backport #26698 by @wxiaoguang
Regression of #23092, the `{{$field := .}}` was missing during that
refactoring.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4af872178e)
