Before, there was a `log/buffer.go`, but that design is not general, and
it introduces a lot of irrelevant `Content() (string, error) ` and
`return "", fmt.Errorf("not supported")` .
And the old `log/buffer.go` is difficult to use, developers have to
write a lot of `Contains` and `Sleep` code.
The new `LogChecker` is designed to be a general approach to help to
assert some messages appearing or not appearing in logs.
Users can now upload `webp` images.
Browsers supporting webp images then display this as the avatar of this
user (every major browser except IE).
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Two small CSS fixes:
1. Fix basic primary label hover
2. Fix border color of divider in dropdown and remove margin so it looks
better with hover effect, as discussed in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24143:
The old code is unnecessarily complex, and has many misuses.
Old code "wraps" a lot, wrap wrap wrap, it's difficult to understand
which kind of handler is used.
The new code uses a general approach, we do not need to write all kinds
of handlers into the "wrapper", do not need to wrap them again and
again.
New code, there are only 2 concepts:
1. HandlerProvider: `func (h any) (handlerProvider func (next)
http.Handler)`, it can be used as middleware
2. Use HandlerProvider to get the final HandlerFunc, and use it for
`r.Get()`
And we can decouple the route package from context package (see the
TODO).
# FAQ
## Is `reflect` safe?
Yes, all handlers are checked during startup, see the `preCheckHandler`
comment. If any handler is wrong, developers could know it in the first
time.
## Does `reflect` affect performance?
No. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24080#discussion_r1164825901
1. This reflect code only runs for each web handler call, handler is far
more slower: 10ms-50ms
2. The reflect is pretty fast (comparing to other code): 0.000265ms
3. XORM has more reflect operations already
Close#24108
Use secondary pointing menu for tabs on user/organization home page so
the tabs look the same.
Main changes:
1. modified a part of dom structure in
`templates/user/overview/header.tmpl` to make it the same as
`templates/org/header.tmpl` in order to produce the same ui.
2. Move some css to `web_src/css/shared/repoorgshared.css` to make them
shareable between `templates/user/overview/header.tmpl` and
`templates/org/header.tmpl`
After:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/232400617-2add5bec-d483-4ab1-b48d-eaee157f7b09.mov
For further improvements. Need some thoughts:
For [this
TODO](729ad294cb/templates/user/overview/header.tmpl (L1)),
it is viable to make it a shared template for [this
part](729ad294cb/templates/user/overview/header.tmpl (L2-L17))
and [this
part](729ad294cb/templates/org/header.tmpl (L1-L16))
because they are the same except for the variable. But for the menu
parts, they are quite different so might not be suitable to use a shared
template. So need some thoughts and advice about extracting the shared
template from these two headers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
# Background
Golang template is not friendly for large projects, and Golang template
team is quite slow, related:
* `https://github.com/golang/go/issues/54450`
Without upstream support, we can also have our solution to make HTML
template functions support context.
It helps a lot, the above Golang template issue `#54450` explains a lot:
1. It makes `{{Locale.Tr}}` could be used in any template, without
passing unclear `(dict "root" . )` anymore.
2. More and more functions need `context`, like `avatar`, etc, we do not
need to do `(dict "Context" $.Context)` anymore.
3. Many request-related functions could be shared by parent&children
templates, like "user setting" / "system setting"
See the test `TestScopedTemplateSetFuncMap`, one template set, two
`Execute` calls with different `CtxFunc`.
# The Solution
Instead of waiting for upstream, this PR re-uses the escaped HTML
template trees, use `AddParseTree` to add related templates/trees to a
new template instance, then the new template instance can have its own
FuncMap , the function calls in the template trees will always use the
new template's FuncMap.
`template.New` / `template.AddParseTree` / `adding-FuncMap` are all
quite fast, so the performance is not affected.
The details:
1. Make a new `html/template/Template` for `all` templates
2. Add template code to the `all` template
3. Freeze the `all` template, reset its exec func map, it shouldn't
execute any template.
4. When a router wants to render a template by its `name`
1. Find the `name` in `all`
2. Find all its related sub templates
3. Escape all related templates (just like what the html template
package does)
4. Add the escaped parse-trees of related templates into a new (scoped)
`text/template/Template`
5. Add context-related func map into the new (scoped) text template
6. Execute the new (scoped) text template
7. To improve performance, the escaped templates are cached to `template
sets`
# FAQ
## There is a `unsafe` call, is this PR unsafe?
This PR is safe. Golang has strict language definition, it's safe to do
so: https://pkg.go.dev/unsafe#Pointer (1) Conversion of a *T1 to Pointer
to *T2
## What if Golang template supports such feature in the future?
The public structs/interfaces/functions introduced by this PR is quite
simple, the code of `HTMLRender` is not changed too much. It's very easy
to switch to the official mechanism if there would be one.
## Does this PR change the template execution behavior?
No, see the tests (welcome to design more tests if it's necessary)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close#24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close: #23738
The actual cause of `500 Internal Server Error` in the issue is not what
is descirbed in the issue.
The actual cause is that after deleting team, if there is a PR which has
requested reivew from the deleted team, the comment could not match with
the deleted team by `assgin_team_id`. So the value of `.AssigneeTeam`
(see below code block) is `nil` which cause `500 error`.
1c8bc4081a/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl (L691-L695)
To fix this bug, there are the following problems to be resolved:
- [x] 1. ~~Stroe the name of the team in `content` column when inserting
`comment` into DB in case that we cannot get the name of team after it
is deleted. But for comments that already exist, just display "Unknown
Team"~~ Just display "Ghost Team" in the comment if the assgined team is
deleted.
- [x] 2. Delete the PR&team binding (the row of which `review_team_id =
${team_id} ` in table `review`) when deleting team.
- [x] 3.For already exist and undeleted binding rows in in table
`review`, ~~we can delete these rows when executing migrations.~~ they
do not affect the function, so won't delete them.
Add a new badge to the repository tab for users and organizations.
The badge is only visible if a repo exists.
Change the badge color of existing "Starred Repositories". (from primary to small)
Closes#24188
Close#7570
1. Clearly define the wiki path behaviors, see
`services/wiki/wiki_path.go` and tests
2. Keep compatibility with old contents
3. Allow to use dashes in titles, eg: "2000-01-02 Meeting record"
4. Add a "Pages" link in the dropdown, otherwise users can't go to the
Pages page easily.
5. Add a "View original git file" link in the Pages list, even if some
file names are broken, users still have a chance to edit or remove it,
without cloning the wiki repo to local.
6. Fix 500 error when the name contains prefix spaces.
This PR also introduces the ability to support sub-directories, but it
can't be done at the moment due to there are a lot of legacy wiki data,
which use "%2F" in file names.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
A vertical overflow appears in Firefox 112/MacOS 12.6 when the system
setting for scrollbars is to "Always" show them.
---
Here, the fixed 100vw container widths are removed, which removes the
overflow. It is, however, only simulated in Developer Tools in latest
Firefox and Chromium, so please test on a Gitea installation.
This matches EasyMDE, and makes it easier to find the right user without
having to remember the exact name.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
