Some streams have 2 PMT sections in a single TS packet. The first one is "valid"
but doesn't contain/define any streams. That causes an unrecoverable issue when
we try to activate the 2nd (valid) PMT.
Instead of doing that, pre-emptively refuse to process PMT without any streams
present within. We still do post that section on the bus to inform applications.
Fixes#1181
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2310>
In push mode (streaming), if the received chunk buffer size from _chain is bigger
than output buffer size, the flags of the divided-buffers are propagated to the
DISCONT flag from first received chunk buffer. This unexpected buffers contained DISCONT
flags are abnormally transformed when changing the sampling rate by audioresample element.
So unset unnecessary DISCONT flag before pad_push().
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2305>
Previously, we only added it when actually performing synchronization
based on the NTP time.
The information can be useful downstream in other situations too, and
we can compute a NTP time as soon as we get a sender report with the
relevant information.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duponchelle <mathieu@centricular.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2252>
The decision to store the input buffer depends on whether extensions
are to be added to the output buffer, I assume as an optimization.
This creates an issue for subclasses that call negotiate(), where
header_exts is actually populated, from their handle_buffer()
implementation: at chain time, no header extension has been negotiated
yet, which means that we don't add extensions to the first batch of
buffers that comes out.
Keep track of whether negotiate has been called (this is different
from the negotiated field) and always store the input buffer until
then. This fixes the issue while largely preserving the optimization.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2304>
The previous iteration of the code was inferring the type of the
frame by looking at the overall size of the gst-payloaded packet.
It is more robust to actually parse the payload and look at the
actual data buffers it contains.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2303>
regardless of whether they are input as individual buffers or
buffer lists.
The ONVIF specification requires all packets to hold the extension,
it makes no sense to behave differently when handling buffer lists.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2303>
Pipeline such as:
gst-launch-1.0 -vf videotestsrc ! video/x-raw,format=NV12,colorimetry=\(string\)bt709 \
! videoscale ! video/x-raw,format=I420 ! fakesink
Always trigger a error:
ERROR video-info video-info.c:556:gst_video_info_from_caps: no width property given
Because it is called before the fixate_size(), the src caps' resolution
may be absent or not fixed. That causes that the src video info can not
be created correctly and we can not inherit the colorimetry and chroma-site
from the input caps.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2289>
Fixing this pipeline:
gst-launch-1.0 filesrc location=sample.png ! pngdec ! videorate ! fakesink
- videorate receives a single buffer with pts = 0, duration = invalid;
- then it receives eos triggering this buffer to be pushed downstream;
- the pushing code was assuming that a duration was set, which is
impossible as we received a single buffer and no output framerate was
set either. So the best we can do is to push the buffer without
duration.
Fix#1177
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2296>
The va pool is used for GPU side surface/image, its alignment should
not be changed arbitrarily by others. So we decide not to expose the
GST_BUFFER_POOL_OPTION_VIDEO_ALIGNMENT flag anymore.
Instead, user can call gst_buffer_pool_config_set_va_alignment() to
set its surface/image alignment.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2282>
According to spec:
color range equal to 0 shall be referred to as the studio swing
representation and color range equal to 1 shall be referred to as
the full swing representation.
The current status is just the opposite.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/2288>