When multiple nals are aggrgated, the marker bit should be associated only
with the last NAL of the packet. Otherwise we may break rendering in with
AU alignment.
This macro is not longer used. It was secretly checking if that nal was
a slice, and confusingly name to that one may think it was checking if
the nal is an AUD.
The code was reading the timestamp from the adapter before pushing the
new buffer into it. As a side effect, if the adapter was empty, we'd end
up using an older timestamp. In alignment=au, it means that all
timestamp was likely one frame in the past, while in alignment=nal, with
multiple slices per frame, the first slice would have the timestamp of
the previous one.
The marker bit is used for efficient decoding. The assumption that
it should be set on the AUD is wrong, since the AUD is conceptually
starts the frame, while the marker is to indicate the end.
So properly set the marker bit as soon as we know we are ending an
AU and also whenever upstream have set the GST_BUFFER_FLAG_MARKER
flag.
The code was reading the timestamp from the adapter before pushing the
new buffer into it. As a side effect, if the adapter was empty, we'd end
up using an older timestamp. In alignment=au, it means that all
timestamp was likely one frame in the past, while in alignment=nal, with
multiple slices per frame, the first slice would have the timestamp of
the previous one.
The marker bit is used for efficient decoding. The assumption that
it should be set on the AUD is wrong, since the AUD is conceptually
starts the frame, while the marker is to indicate the end.
So properly set the marker bit as soon as we know we are ending an
AU and also whenever upstream have set the GST_BUFFER_FLAG_MARKER
flag.
Don't allow external encoder to use one of the reserved NAL type
implicated in NAL aggreation. These out-of-spec NAL types, if passed
from the outside world will lead to an invalid RTP payload being
created.
Strip ADTS headers if we detect any, apparently some Sony cameras
send AAC with ADTS headers. We could also change the stream-format
in the output caps, but that would be unexpected to pipeline builders
and would not exactly be backwards compatible.
Both rtpmp4vpay and rtpmp4gpay support MPEG4 elementary streams. But
the most supported variant is the video-specific one (rtpmp4vpay),
therefore increase the rank of that one so that auto-plugging of
payloaders for MPEG4 elementary streams ends up picking that one
and not the generic one.
rtph264pay and rtph265pay skip updating the parameter set timestamp if
the units they see contain no new configuration. This can result in
them injecting duplicate parameters.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796748
All these were copy pasted and would lead to assertion when chained with
rtpmux. This commit rewrite the negotiation with downstream. This also
drop the fallback to ancient names if the pad is unlinked. This was
completly arbitrary decision that made no sense.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796809
Just remove the code. It's not doing anything useful anyways. The modified
caps are the result of a caps query, so either not used afterwards of a
reference to some internal caps of another element that should not be
modified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796837
ULP FEC, as defined in RFC 5109, has the protected and protection
packets sharing the same ssrc, and a different payload type, and
implies rewriting the seqnums of the protected stream when encoding
the protection packets. This has the unfortunate drawback of not
being able to tell whether a lost packet was a protection packet.
rtpbasedepayload relies on gaps in the seqnums to set the DISCONT
flag on buffers it outputs. Before that commit, this created two
problems:
* The protection packets don't make it as far as the depayloader,
which means it will mark buffers as DISCONT every time the previous
packets were protected
* While we could work around the previous issue by looking at
the protection packets ignored and dropped in rtpptdemux, we
would still mark buffers as DISCONT when a FEC packet was lost,
as we cannot know that it was indeed a FEC packet, even though
this should have no impact on the decoding of the stream
With this commit, we consider that when using ULPFEC, gaps in
the seqnums are not a reliable indicator of whether buffers should
be marked as DISCONT or not, and thus rewrite the seqnums on
the decoding side as well to form a perfect sequence, this
obviously doesn't prevent the jitterbuffer from doing its job
as the ulpfec decoder is downstream from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794909
Fix compilation with MSVC. We still assume that attribute
is supported by all other relevant compilers, which seems
to be the case since we haven't had any complaints about
similar code in rtpsbcpay.
rtpulpfeccommon.c:432:27: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type
‘long unsigned int’, but argument 10 has type ‘guint64 {aka long long unsigned int}’
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793732
The ulpfecenc "mux-seq" and "ssrc" properties were initially added
because the element did more than implement ULPFEC. As it was
decided that FLEXFEC would be implemented in a separate element,
both properties are now unneeded and confusing.
Change the default for the ulpfecenc multi-packet property,
as it is expected that most users of this element will be protecting video
streams.
Change the default property for the rtpredenc allow-no-red-blocks
property, as it should also be its default mode of operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793843
It is expected that when connecting to a stream that has
already started, the caps will only arrive at the interval
specified on rtpgstpay, we shouldn't be warning as this is
a normal mode of operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793798
We expose a set of new elements:
* ULPFEC encoder / decoder
* A storage element, which should be placed before jitterbuffers,
and is used to store packets in order to attempt reconstruction
after the jitterbuffer has sent PacketLost events
* RED encoder / decoder (RFC 2198), these are necessary to
use FEC in webrtc, as browsers will propose and expect ulpfec
packets to be wrapped in red packets
With contributions from:
Mathieu Duponchelle <mathieu@centricular.com>
Sebastian Dröge <sebastian@centricular.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792696
All received configurations are parsed and added to a list, this lead
to an unbounded memory usage. As the configuration is resent every
second this quickly lead to a large memory usage.
Add a check to only add the config if it is not already available in
the list. This fix only handle the typical case of a well behaved
stream, a malicious server could still send many useless
configurations to raise the client memory usage.
