Commit graph

16 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thibault Saunier
f5aee5df57 container: Make initiated_move a read only protected member
It is a interesting information for subclasses.
Conflicts:
	ges/ges-container.c
2013-07-09 22:13:40 +02:00
Thibault Saunier
b2b96c743d Rename GESTimelineLayer to GESLayer 2013-04-23 20:22:31 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
e1cac75df4 container: The TimelineElement.inpoint property is call "in-point" not inpoint 2013-04-15 00:18:05 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
8d4ce97fc3 container: s/get_priorty_range/get_priority_range/ 2013-03-30 12:31:50 +01:00
Thibault Saunier
cd188c851d container: Let subclasses handle the height
+ Fix tests (starting using GESTestClip instead of GESCustomClip)

Now the height is not only growing, but can also go down, as the value
is just simply computed

API:
	GESContainer::compute_height virtual method
2013-03-28 11:16:41 +01:00
Thibault Saunier
b5f2c819fc container: Properly implement ges_container_group 2013-03-28 11:16:41 +01:00
Thibault Saunier
0df2d4f945 container: Make sure that the child exists when emiting the "child-removed" signal
+ Add a test
2013-03-28 11:16:41 +01:00
Thibault Saunier
229ec5f435 container: Replace ignore_notify by a GESChildrenControlMode flag 2013-03-23 03:26:33 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
c6078abc97 container: Stop ignoring notifies if ->add_child fails 2013-03-23 01:35:02 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
7f1fbd2300 internal: Add a element_end_compare 2013-03-23 01:34:50 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
0767f08c7a Always prefer gst_object_(un)ref over g_object_(un)ref
Making the refcount issue debugging easier
2013-03-18 12:48:41 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
aa740d86bd Remove GESTrackElements from GESTracks when removing from a GESClip
... Not the other way round.

  + Add and enhance debugging info on the way

The user should not be responsible for removing the GESTrackElements from
GESTracks, instead, removing it from a GESClip should imply removing
it from any GESTrack it is in.

This patch changes sensibly the behaviour when we remove a
GESTrackElement from a GESTrack, not remoing it from the GESClip it is
in. *But*, users should never remove a GESTrackElement from a GESTrack
anyway. The testsuite has been updated to that new behaviour.
2013-03-15 11:17:06 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
f579a6a95c container: Add a ges_container_group method
+ Add some basic unit tests

API:
  GESContainer:group vmethod
  ges_container_group
2013-03-15 00:13:09 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
c73ced52f8 container: Add a way to ungroup a GESContainer into several GESContainers
+ Add simple unit test

API:
  GESContainerClass::ungroup vmethod
  ges_container_ungroup
2013-03-15 00:13:09 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
3136ccf84c Fix some documentations 2013-03-15 00:13:08 -03:00
Thibault Saunier
795b8df1b6 Implement GESContainer
+ Fix unit tests
  + Minor enhancement in unit tests

API changes:
-----------
  * ges_track_element_get_clip     -> ges_timeline_element_get_parent
  * ges_clip_add_track_element     -> ges_container_add
  * ges_clip_release_track_element -> ges_container_remove
  * ges_clip_get_track_elements    -> ges_container_get_children
                                      (or GES_CONTAINER_CHILDREN)
2013-03-15 00:13:08 -03:00