Both gst_value_intersect and gst_value_subtract will call
gst_value_compare if one of their arguments isn't a list.
gst_value_compare will then re-do a check to see if one of
the arguments is a list (for the special case of comparing a unitary
value with a list of length 1).
The problem is that the various G_VALUE_HOLDS represent an expensive
amount of calling gst_value_compare (almost half of it) to see if
the provided arguments are list. These checks can be done without
when we know that the arguments aren't lists.
* Create a new "nolist" gst_value_compare which avoids that special
case comparision
Benchmarks:
valgrind/callgrind: average speedup in instruction calls for
gst_value_intersect and gst_value_subtract is around 56% (Makes 63%
of the calls it used to take previously)
tests/benchmarks/capsnego: With default settings (depth 4, children 3
607 elements), time taken for transition from READY to PAUSED:
Before : 00.391519153
After : 00.220397492
56% of the time previously used, +77% speedup
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731756
First handle all miniobjects before we attempt to dereference the first
field pointer and look at the GType. With the recent glib change to
speed up G_IS_OBJECT, this causes crashes on miniobjects otherwise.
When a pad is added the need-parent flag is set to true, so when
they are removed the flag should be set back to false
This was preventing GstPads to be reused in elements (removed and
later re-added). A unit tests was added to verify that this is
working now.
The use case is tsdemux that has a program-number property and
allows the user to switch programs. In order to do that tsdemux
will remove the pads of the current program and add from the new
ones. The removed pads are kept in the demuxer for later if the
user selects the old program again.
Stores the last result of a gst_pad_push or a pull on the GstPad and provides
a getter and a macro to access this field.
Whenever the pad is inactive it is set to FLUSHING
API: gst_pad_get_last_flow_return
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709224
Currently there is no other way to unlock a buffer pool other then
stopping it. This may have the effect of freeing all the buffers,
which is too heavy for a seek. This patch add a method to enter and
leave flushing state. As a convenience, flush_start/flush_stop
virtual are added so pool implementation can also unblock their own
internal poll atomically with the rest of the pool. This is fully
backward compatible with doing stop/start to actually flush the pool
(as being done in GstBaseSrc).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727611
When we call gst_buffer_pool_set_config() the pool may return FALSE and
slightly change the parameters. This helper is useful to do the minial required
validation before accepting the modified configuration.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727916
According to the documentation, when set_config() return false, it should be
possible to read the modified version of the config. This patch fixes the
implementation so it is now according to the documentation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727916
If a pool config is being configured again, check if the configuration have changed.
If not, skip that step. Finally, if the pool is active, try deactivating it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728268
They are very confusing for people, and more often than not
also just not very accurate. Seeing 'last reviewed: 2005' in
your docs is not very confidence-inspiring. Let's just remove
those comments.
Currently we set TAG_MEMORY as soon a resize changes the size of one
of the memory. This has the side effect that buffer pool cannot know if
the memory have simply been resized, or if the memorys has been replaced.
This make it hard to actually implement _reset(). Instead, only set the
TAG_MEMORY if one or more memory has been replaced, and do a light
sanity check of the size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727109
We might not have reached PAUSED yet because of an async error,
but nonetheless we want to make sure that the pads are always
deactivated in READY state.
The step can end up being zero if the underlying value isn't a valid
range GValue.
In those cases, return FALSE.
We don't use g_return*_if_fail since it will already have been triggered
by the above-mentionned _get_step() functions.
CID #1037132
This should allow for more meaningful errors. Dereferencing NULL
is more useful information than dereferencing a random address
happened to be on the stack.
