Depayloaders will look at rtpbuffer->buffer for the discont flag.
When we set the discont flag on a buffer in the rtp base depayloader
and we have to make the buffer writable, make sure the rtpbuffer
actually contains the newly-flagged buffer, not the original input
buffer. This was introduced with the addition of the process_rtp_packet
vfunc, but would only trigger if the input buffer wasn't flagged
already and was not writable already.
When we detect a discont and the input buffer isn't already flagged
as discont, handle_buffer() does a gst_buffer_make_writable() on the
input buffer in order to set the flag. This assumed it had ownership
of the input buffer though, which it didn't. This would still work
fine in most scenarios, but could lead to crashes or mini object
unref criticals in some cases when a discont is detected, e.g. when
using pcapparse in front of a depayloader. This problem was
introduced in bc14cdf529.
Encrypted RTP buffers may contain encrypted padding, hence it's
necessary to have an option to relax the validation in order to
successfully map the buffer.
When the flag GST_RTP_BUFFER_MAP_FLAG_SKIP_PADDING is set
gst_rtp_buffer_map() will map the buffer like if padding is not
present.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752705
Use the object lock to protect the internal segment when updating
against access from getting the stats property.
Fix a critical in gst-inspect or when retrieving the stats
before any segment has arrived by checking whether the
segment has been initted..
The payloader didn't copy anything so far, the depayloader copied every
possible meta. Let's make it consistent and just copy all metas without
tags or with only the audio tag.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751774
There was a confusion, six depayloaders where passing through the
timestamp while the base class was re-timestamping to running
time. This inconstancy has been unnoticed has in most use cases
the incoming segment is [0, inifnity] in which case timestamps are
the same as running time. With DTS/PTS shifting added (to avoid
negative values) and pcapparse sending a different segment this
started being an issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753037
When there is no clock_base provided, the start position is
set to 0 instead of the original segment start value. This
would break synchronization if start was not 0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752228
Add process_rtp_packet() vfunc that works just like the
existing process() vfunc only that it takes the GstRTPBuffer
that the base class has already mapped (with MAP_READ),
which means that the subclass doesn't have to map it again,
which allows more performant processing of input buffers
for most RTP depayloaders.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750235
The padding (if any) is included in the length of the last packet, see
RFC 3550.
Section 6.4.1:
padding (P): 1 bit
If the padding bit is set, this individual RTCP packet contains
some additional padding octets at the end which are not part of
the control information but are included in the length field. The
last octet of the padding is a count of how many padding octets
should be ignored, including itself (it will be a multiple of
four).
Section A.2:
* The padding bit (P) should be zero for the first packet of a
compound RTCP packet because padding should only be applied, if it
is needed, to the last packet.
* The length fields of the individual RTCP packets must add up to
the overall length of the compound RTCP packet as received.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751883
Otherwise ssrc changes via rtpsession's (deprecated!) internal-ssrc property
are not possible anymore. rtpsession was now patched to only suggest an ssrc
if it makes sense to do so.
In 2.0 we should get rid of all the properties that are also negotiated via
caps, the code and behaviour is too confusing otherwise.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749581
According to this section of the rfc.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5506#section-3.4.2
The validation should be updated to accept more types of RTCP
packages, with this mask change feedback packages will be also
accepted.
Change-Id: If5ead59e03c7c60bbe45a9b09f3ff680e7fa4868
Micro-optimisation: if the buffer consist of just one memory, we
know we have already mapped that memory to read the headers, so
no need to map it another time to get to the payload data, we
can just set up the payload data details right there and then
and avoid another map call in gst_rtp_buffer_get_payload().
Adds up when receiving RTP-payloaded raw video which can easily
be thousands of packets per frame.
Implement a chain_list function, which avoids lots of locking
compared to the default fallback implementation in GstPad.
We may also want to do some more sophisticated timestamp
tracking here at some point, but for now leave it up to the
jitterbuffer and/or subclasses (in case buffers in the
buffer list have no timestamp set on them, there may only
be a timestamp for the whole list on the first buffer).
This provides the exact same behaviour as the default
fallback implementation.
This affects the pt, ssrc, seqnum-offset and timestamp-offset properties. If
they were set from a property, or we configured caps before, we try to use
that value for them. Even if the first structure of the downstream caps
specifies a different value, we check if the value is supported by other
structures.
Only if all this fails, we use the values given by downstream in the first
structure, i.e. if no properties were set and these are the first caps we
negotiate or downstream does not support our values.
By doing this we ensure that we don't spuriously change ssrcs or other fields
in the middle of the stream (and also consider property values more). Ssrc
changes would currently happen after sending an RTX packet (thus creating a
new internal source inside the rtpsession), and then renegotiating the
payloader (which then gets the RTX ssrc from rtpsession).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749581
When generating segment, we can't assume the first buffer is actually
the first expected one. If it's not, we need to adjust the segment to
start a bit before.
Additionally, we if don't know when the stream is suppose to have
started (no clock-base in caps), it means we need to keep everything in
running time and only rely on jitterbuffer to synchronize.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635701
They are very confusing for people, and more often than not
also just not very accurate. Seeing 'last reviewed: 2005' in
your docs is not very confidence-inspiring. Let's just remove
those comments.
