And also consider HEADER buffers without DELTA_UNIT flag as sync points. This
fixes sync-mode=2 with mpegtsmux for example, which has no streamheaders but
puts the HEADER flag on its keyframes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763278
Add a property and logic to send a GstNetworkMessage event containing
the message that was received from a client. This can be used to
implement simply bidirectional communication.
Add a property and logic to send a GstNetworkMessageDispatched
event upstream to notify that a buffer has been sent. This can be used
to keep track of what client received what buffers.
Add a property to handle GstNetworkMessage events. These events contain
a buffer that is sent on the socket to allow for simple bidirectional
communication.
When we stop sending because we need more data, still keep a GSource
around to receive data from the clients.
Also handle read and write in the same go.
The client-removed signal used G_INT_TYPE instead of G_SOCKET_TYPE
in its definition leading to problems on platforms where the size
of a pointer is larger than the size of an integer, It would also
not work at all with dynamic language bindings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757155
Have all sections in alphabetical order. Also make the macro order consistent.
This is a preparation for generating the file. Remove GET_CLASS macro for
some elements, since it is not used and the header is not installed.
From the API documentation: "Note that it is generally not
a good idea to reuse an existing cancellable for more
operations after it has been cancelled once, as this
function might tempt you to do. The recommended practice
is to drop the reference to a cancellable after cancelling
it, and let it die with the outstanding async operations.
You should create a fresh cancellable for further async
operations."
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739132
We don't expect clients to send us any data, but if they do, just
ignore it. Web browsers might send us an HTTP request for example,
but some will still be happy if we just send them data without
a proper HTTP response.
There was a bug in the reading code path. We only have a small
read buffer and would provoke an EWOULDBLOCK trying to read
because we don't bail out of the loop early enough.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743834
multisocketsink now understands the new GstNetControlMessageMeta to allow
sending control messages (ancillary data) with data when writing to Unix
domain sockets.
Thanks to glib's `GSocketControlMessage` abstraction the code introduced
in this commit is entirely portable and doesn't introduce and additional
dependencies or conditionally compiled code, even if it is unlikely to be
of much use on non-UNIX systems.
multisocketsink now understands the new GstNetControlMessageMeta to allow
sending control messages (ancillary data) with data when writing to Unix
domain sockets.
A later commit will introduce a new socketsrc element which will similarly
understand `GstNetControlMessageMeta`. This, when used with a
`GSocketControlMessage` of type `GUnixFDMessage` will allow GStreamer to
send and receive file-descriptions in ancillary data, the first step to
using memfds to implement zero-copy video IPC.
Thanks to glib's `GSocketControlMessage` abstraction the code introduced
in this commit is entirely portable and doesn't introduce and additional
dependencies or conditionally compiled code, even if it is unlikely to be
of much use on non-UNIX systems.
This provides notification that the socket in use was closed by the peer
and gives an opportunity to replace it with a new one which is not
closed, allowing reading from many sockets in order.
I use this in pulsevideo to implement reconnection logic to handle the
pulsevideo service dieing, such that is can be restarted without
disrupting downstream.
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739546
* Don't bother polling, just do a blocking read, the `GCancellable` will
take care of unlocking. This should also be faster on MS Windows where
the GIO documentation for `g_socket_get_available_bytes` states: "Note
that on Windows, this function is rather inefficient in the UDP case".
* Implement `GstPushSrc.fill` rather than `GstPushSrc.create`. This means
that we will be using the downstream allocator which may be more
efficient. It also means that socketsrc is likely to respect its
"blocksize" property (assuming that there is enough data available).
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739546
`socketsrc` can be considered a source counterpart to `multisocketsink`.
It can be considered a generalization of `tcpclientsrc` and
`tcpserversrc`: it contains all the logic required to communicate over
the socket but none of the logic for creating the sockets/establishing
the connection in the first place, allowing the user to accomplish this
externally in whatever manner they wish making it applicable to other
types of sockets besides TCP.
This commit essentially copies the implementation directly from
tcpserversrc. Later patches will tidy the implementation up and
re-implement `tcpclientsrc` and `tcpserversrc` in terms of `socketsrc`.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739546
If a buffer is made up of non-contiguous `GstMemory`s `gst_buffer_map`
has to copy all the data into a new `GstMemory` which is contiguous. By
mapping all the `GstMemory`s individually and then using scatter-gather
IO we avoid this situation.
This is a preparatory step for adding support to multisocketsink for
sending file descriptors, where a GstBuffer may be made up of several
`GstMemory`s, some of which are backed by a memfd or file, but I think this
patch is valid and useful on its own.
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746150
Canceling the accept/select happens when the source is shut down. This is
not an error and the GST_FLOW_ERROR causes problems when only part of the
pipeline is shut down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731567
They are very confusing for people, and more often than not
also just not very accurate. Seeing 'last reviewed: 2005' in
your docs is not very confidence-inspiring. Let's just remove
those comments.
Each write will update the last_activity_time and otherwise we would
compare against a too old current time and immediately timeout because
current time is smaller than last activity time (overflow).
Each write will update the last_activity_time and otherwise we would
compare against a too old current time and immediately timeout because
current time is smaller than last activity time (overflow).
