Handle sprop-vps, sprop-sps and sprop-pps in caps instead of
sprop-parameter-sets.
rtph265pay works with byte-stream and hvc1 formats but not hev1 yet. It
handles profile-id, tier-flag and level-id in caps query.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753760
Remove calls to gst_pad_has_current_caps() which then go on to call
gst_pad_get_current_caps() as the caps can go to NULL in between. Instead just
use gst_pad_get_current_caps() and check for NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759539
The payloader didn't copy anything so far, the depayloader copied every
possible meta. Let's make it consistent and just copy all metas without
tags or with only the video tag.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751774
h264parse and gstrtph264depay do the same, let's keep the behaviour
consistent. As we now include the codec_data inside the stream, this causes
less caps renegotiation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753228
rtph264depay does the same and this fixes decoding of some streams with 32
SPS (or 256 PPS). It is allowed to have SPS ID 0 to 31 (or PPS ID 0 to 255),
but the field in the codec_data for the number of SPS or PPS is only 5
(or 8) bit. As such, 32 SPS (or 256 PPS) are interpreted as 0 everywhere.
This looks like a mistake in the part of the spect about the codec_data.
This causes an assertion and would lead to getting a NULL instead
of a buffer. Without proper checking this would easily lead to a
segfault.
Related to rpth264depay: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737199
After further investigation the previous commit is wrong. The code intended to
check if the type is 39 or the ranges 41-44 and 48-55. Just like gsth265parse.c
does. Type 40 would not be complete.
nal_type is the index for a GstH265NalUnitType enum. There are two types of dead
code here:
First, after checking if nal_type is >= 39 there are two OR conditionals that
check if the value is in ranges higher than that number, so if nal_type >= 39
falls in the True branch those other conditions aren't checked and if it falls
in the False branch and they are checked, they will always also be False. They
are redundant.
Second, the enum has a range of 0 to 40. So the checks for ranges higher than 41
should never be True.
Removing this redundant checks.
CID 1249684
