Just remove one skip annotation that causes this:
** (g-ir-compiler:12458): ERROR **: Caught NULL node, parent=empty
with older g-i versions such as 1.32.1.
Adds gst_byte_reader_masked_scan_uint32_peek just like
GstAdapter has a _peek and non _peek version
Upgraded tests to check that the returned value is correct in the
_peek version
API: gst_byte_reader_masked_scan_uint32_peek
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728356
When going to READY, it is possible that we are still pusing a frame but that
our srcpad has already been set to flushing. In that case we should not
post any error on the bus but instead cleanly return FLOW_FLUSHING.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733320
* GstGlobalDeviceMonitor was renamed to GstDeviceMonitor
* Expand GST_MESSAGE_DEVICE to the full enum value names
* Correct the incorrect references to the GstDeviceProvider interfaces
* Describe caps arguments for gstcheck interface
* Add missing docs for GstNetAddressMeta and its add function
* Add docs for toc helper macros
* Avoid refering to GstValueList type as done elsewhere
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732786
When the parser receives non-aligned packets it can push a buffer
and get a not-linked return while still leaving some data still to
be parsed. This remaining data will not form a complete frame and
the subclass likely returns _OK and baseparse would take that
as the return, while it the element is actually not-linked.
This patch fixes this by storing the last flow-return from a push
and using that if a parsing operation doesn't result in data being
flushed or skipped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731474
Currently the scan uses Boyer-moore method and its performance is good.
but, it can be optimized from an implementation of view.
The original scan code is implemented by byte array and index-based access.
In _scan_for_start_code(), the index is increasing from start to end and the
base address of the byte array is referred to as return value.
In the case, index-based access can be replaced by pointer access, which
improve the performance by removing index-related operations.
Its performace is enhanced by approximately 8% on arm-based embedded devices.
Although it seems trivial, it can affect the overall performance because the
_scan_for_start_code() function is very often called when H.264/H.265 video is
played.
In addition, the technique can apply for all architectures and it is good in
view of readability and maintainability.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731442
Adds a utility struct that is capable of storing and aggregating flow returns
associated with pads.
This way all demuxers will have a standard function to use and have the
same expected results.
Includes tests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709224
Buffer pool set_config() may return FALSE if requested configuration needed
small changes. Reget the config and try setting it again (validating the
changes first). This ensure we have a configured pool if possible.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727916
exit() will call atexit handlers, which may try to
clean up things or wait for things to get cleaned up,
which we don't want or need. We just want to stop
and let the parent know about the failure as quickly
as possible in case fork() is used.
Fixes timeouts on assert failures in checks where
an exit handler waits for things to stop, but they
don't stop because they haven't been shut down,
and they haven't been shut down because there's no
simple way to do so on failures.
http://sourceforge.net/p/check/patches/50/
Currently, if prepare() takes too much time, we skip the call to render().
The side effect of this, is that we endup starving the render(). The solution
in this patch is to always render frames that are on time before prepare() is
executed. This will maximize the number of frames we display and smoothly
degrade the rendering performance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729335
They are very confusing for people, and more often than not
also just not very accurate. Seeing 'last reviewed: 2005' in
your docs is not very confidence-inspiring. Let's just remove
those comments.
Keep it simple. Likely also makes things easier for bindings,
and efficiency clearly has not been a consideration given how
the existing code handled these lists.
