By passing NULL to `g_signal_new` instead of a marshaller, GLib will
actually internally optimize the signal (if the marshaller is available
in GLib itself) by also setting the valist marshaller. This makes the
signal emission a bit more performant than the regular marshalling,
which still needs to box into `GValue` and call libffi in case of a
generic marshaller.
Note that for custom marshallers, one would use
`g_signal_set_va_marshaller()` with the valist marshaller instead.
The queue gets filled by the tail, so a query will always be the tail
object, not the head object. Also add a _peek_tail_struct() method to the
GstQueueArray to enable looking at the tail.
With unit test to prevent future regression.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762875
After EOS, it is possible for a pad to be resetted by sending
either a STREAM_START or SEGMENT event
Mimic the same behaviour when receiving STREAM_START/SEGMENT events
in queue if we are EOS'd
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786056
When queue-like elements are in "EOS" situation (received GST_FLOW_EOS
from downstream or EOS was pushed), they drain buffers/events that
wouldn't be processed anyway and let through events that might
modify the EOS situation.
Previously only GST_EVENT_EOS and GST_EVENT_SEGMENT events were let
through, but we also need to allow GST_EVENT_STREAM_START to go
through since it resets the EOS state of pads since 1.6
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786034
Return the correct flow return instead of returning always flushing.
This would cause queue to convert not-linked to flushing and making
upstream elements stop.
Based on the previous patch for queue2.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776999
It might happen that the srcpad task function is never called at all, in
which case unlocking everything from there will never happen.
Make sure to unlock everything another time after the task function is
definitely stopped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776039
When subtracting queued data sizes from upstream queries
in queue, queue2, downloadbuffer and typefind, clamp the
result to not go negative, in case upstream returned
a nonsense value that's too small (as could happen if
upstream is estimating, or just broken)
On the first buffer, it's possible that sink_segment is set but
src_segment has not been set yet. If this is the case, we should not
calculate cur_level.time since sink_segment.position may be large and
src_segment.position default is 0, with the resulting diff being larger
than max-size-time, causing the queue to start leaking (if
leaky=downstream).
One potential consequence of this is that the segment event may be
stored on the srcpad before the caps event is pushed downstream, causing
a g_warning ("Sticky event misordering, got 'segment' before 'caps'").
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773096
... when flushing and deactivating pads. Otherwise downstream might have a
query that was already unreffed by upstream, causing crashes or other
interesting effects.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763496
The input of queue/queue2 might have DTS set, in which cas we want
to take that into account (instead of the PTS) to calculate position
and queue levels.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756507
Microoptimisation: Let GstQueueArray store our
item struct. That way we don't have to alloc/free
temporary QueueItem slices for every item we want
to put into the queue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750149
Otherwise we might wait forever for serialized queries to be handled as the
loop function is stopped and as such we will never ever dequeue the query and
handle it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745319
This might create deadlocks and we need to avoid holding element
specific lock while posting messages
For example a deadlock will happen if while posting the message,
someone connected on the bus (sync) tries to DOT the pipeline.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737102
Don't re-start the queue push task on the source pad when a
flush-stop event comes in and we're in the process of shutting
down, otherwise that task will never be stopped again.
When the element is set to READY state, the pads get de-activated.
The source pad gets deactivated before the queue's own activate_mode
function on the source pads gets called (which will stop the thread),
so checking whether the pad is active before re-starting the task on
receiving flush-stop should be fine. The problem would happen when the
flush-stop handler was called just after the queue's activate mode
function had stopped the task.
Spotted and debugged by Linus Svensson <linux.svensson@axis.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734688
During FLUSH_START the query needs to be unblocked already, otherwise
it can lead to deadlocks if the FLUSH_START is the result of something
done from the streaming thread of the srcpad (the queue will never be
emptied!).
