In the case where you have a source giving the GstAggregator smaller
buffers than it uses, when it reaches a timeout, it will consume the
first buffer, then try to read another buffer for the pad. If the
previous element is not fast enough, it may get the next buffer even
though it may be queued just before. To prevent that race, the easiest
solution is to move the queue inside the GstAggregatorPad itself. It
also means that there is no need for strange code cause by increasing
the min latency without increasing the max latency proportionally.
This also means queuing the synchronized events and possibly acting
on them on the src task.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745768
We need to sync the pad values before taking the aggregator and pad locks
otherwise the element will just deadlock if there's any property changes
scheduled using GstController since that involves taking the aggregator and pad
locks.
Also add a test for this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749574
Also:
- Don't modify size on early buffer
The size is the size of the buffer, not of remaining part.
- Use the input caps when manipulating the input buffer
Also store in in the sink pad
- Reply to the position query in bytes too
- Put GAP flag on output if all inputs are GAP data
- Only try to clip buffer if the incoming segment is in time or samples
- Use incoming segment with incoming timestamp
Handle non-time segments and NONE timestamps
- Don't reset the position when pushing out new caps
- Make a number of member variables private
- Correctly handle case where no pad has a buffer
If none of the pads have buffers that can be handled, don't claim to be EOS.
- Ensure proper locking
- Only support time segments
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740236
