Handle sprop-vps, sprop-sps and sprop-pps in caps instead of
sprop-parameter-sets.
rtph265pay works with byte-stream and hvc1 formats but not hev1 yet. It
handles profile-id, tier-flag and level-id in caps query.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753760
This is to handle cases where upstream handles the fragmented streaming in TIME
segments and sends us data with gaps within fragments. This would happen when dealing
with trick-modes.
When upstream (push-based, TIME SEGMENT) wishes to send discontinuous samples,
it must obey the following rules:
* The buffer containing the [moof] must have a valid GST_BUFFER_OFFSET
* The buffers containing the first sample after a gap:
* MUST start at the beginning of a sample,
* MUST have the DISCONT flag set,
* MUST have a valid GST_BUFFER_OFFSET relative to the beginning of the fragment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767354
Some endpoints (like Tandberg E20) can send BYE packet containing our
internal SSRC. I this case we would detect SSRC collision and get rid
of the source at some point. But because we are still sending packets
with that SSRC the source will be recreated immediately.
This brand new internal source will not have some variables incorrectly
set in its state. For example 'seqnum-base` and `clock-rate` values will be
-1.
The fix is not to act on BYE RTCP if it contains internal or unknown
SSRC.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762219
Keeping the lock while emitting the stats signal introduces potential
deadlock in those situations when the signal callback wants the access
to rtpsession's properties which also requre the lock.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762216
Avoid using soup_server_run_async and old get_port() APIs,
replace with me soup_server_listen and get the port through the
URIs list returned from the server.
When a packet arrives that has already been considered lost as part of a
large gap the "lost timer" for this will be cancelled. If the remaining
packets of this large gap never arrives, there will be missing entries
in the queue and the loop function will keep waiting for these packets
to arrive and never push another packet, effectively stalling the
pipeline.
The proposed fix conciders parts of a large gap definitely lost (since
they are calculated from latency) and ignores the late arrivals.
In practice the issue is rare since large gaps are scheduled immediately,
and for the stall to happen the late arrival needs to be processed
before this times out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765933
In other words, gst_pad_get_current_caps should never return NULL
in a pad-added callback from the demuxer.
Added tests for the two special cases with AAC and H.264 where this
would happen every time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763780
Making the event itself writable is not enough, it won't make
the actual taglist in the event writable as well. Instead, just
make a copy of the taglist and then create a new tag event from
that if required, replacing the old one. Before we would
inadvertently modify taglists upstream elements might still
be holding on to. Add unit test for this as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762793
Use fail_unless and friends instead of g_assert
Factor seq-num checking out to separate function
Check more return-values from push and crank and others
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762254
This way we can use -1 as special value, which is nicer than MAXUINT.
This is backwards compatible even with the GValue API, as shown by
a unit test.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757892
By not doing this, the muxer is not effectively a rtpmuxer, rather a
funnel, since it should be a single stream that exists the muxer.
If not specified, take the first ssrc seen on a sinkpad, allowing upstream
to decide ssrc in "passthrough" with only one sinkpad.
Also, let downstream ssrc overrule internal configured one
We hence has the following order for determining the ssrc used by
rtpmux:
0. Suggestion from GstRTPCollision event
1. Downstream caps
2. ssrc-Property
3. (First) upstream caps containing ssrc
4. Randomly generated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752694
Avoid using default accept-caps handler that will query downstream
and is more expensive. Just check if the caps is compatible with
the template and check if the channels are the same.
The time of the first RTCP packet is semi-random, so
sometimes it was produced before enough packets from
the second SSRC were received. First drop queued RTCP
packets, then advance the clock enough to ensure
that at least one new RTCP packet is produced.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750731
The accept-caps query just does a shallow check at the current
element while at this test we want it to also look at downstream.
So use caps query there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753623
