We now take the maximum of 2*jitter and 0.5*packet_spacing for the extra
delay. If jitter is very low, this should prevent unnecessary retransmission
requests to some degree.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748041
This also happens in the very beginning when we receive the first packet, a
warning would be very confusing here. In all places where we should warn about
this, we would've printed a warning already before.
Right above we consider lost_packet packets, each of them having duration,
as lost and triggered their timers immediately. Below we use expected_dts
to schedule retransmission or schedule lost timers for the packets that
come after expected_dts.
As we just triggered lost_packets packets as lost, there's no point in
scheduling new timers for them and we can just skip over all lost packets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739868
Resetting the jitterbuffer drops all packets and other things, and will cause
a discontinuity in the packets received by the depayloaders. They should now
also flush anything they had pending as the new data will start at a different
position.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739868
Make sure that the sync_src pad has caps before the segment event.
Otherwise we might get a segment event before caps from the receive
RTCP pad, and then later when receiving RTCP packets will set caps.
This will results in a sticky event misordering warning
This fixes warnings in the rtpaux unit test but also in the
rtpaux and rtx examples in tests/examples/rtp
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746445
Before we only started it when either:
- there is no send RTP stream
or
- we received an RTP packet for sending
This could mean that if the send RTP pads are connected but never receive any
RTP data, and the same session is also used for receiving RTP/RTCP, we would
never start the RTCP thread and would never send RTCP for the receiving part
of the session.
This can be reproduced with a pipeline like:
gst-launch-1.0 rtpbin name=rtpbin \
udpsrc port=5000 ! "application/x-rtp, media=video, clock-rate=90000, encoding-name=H264" ! rtpbin.recv_rtp_sink_0 \
udpsrc port=5001 ! rtpbin.recv_rtcp_sink_0 \
rtpbin.send_rtcp_src_0 ! fakesink name=rtcp_fakesink silent=false async=false sync=false \
rtpbin.recv_rtp_src_0_2553225531_96 ! decodebin ! xvimagesink \
fakesrc ! valve drop=true ! rtpbin.send_rtp_sink_0 \
rtpbin.send_rtp_src_0 ! fakesink name=rtp_fakesink silent=false async=false sync=false -v
Before this change the rtcp_fakesink would never send RTCP for the receiving
part of the session (i.e. no receiver reports!), after the change it does.
And before and after this change it would send RTCP for the receiving part of
the session if the sender part was omitted (the last two lines).
These are outside the expected range of sequence numbers and should be
clipped, especially for RTSP they might belong to packets from before a seek
or a previous stream in general.
This reverts commit 1591adf4cd.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745586#c1:
It's the beginning of an implementation of RFC 2762, which is needed for
large multicast groups. The implementation is not yet complete but why
not leave what is there and implement RFC 2762 instead?
rtpsession declares an array of maps to store srrcs but only the
the key 0 is being used. This patch replaces the array of maps
for just one map and remove useless parameters in rtpsession
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745586
According to RFC 4585 section 3.5.3 step 1 we are not allowed to send
an early RTCP packet for the very first one. It must be a regular one.
Also make sure to not use last_rtcp_send_time in any calculations until
we actually sent an RTCP packet already. In specific this means that we
must not use it for forward reconsideration of the current RTCP send time.
Instead we don't do any forward reconsideration for the first RTCP packet.
This will be emitted whenever an RTCP packet is received. Different to
on-feedback-rtcp, this signal gets every complete RTCP packet and not
just the individual feedback packets.
It had no effect since quite some time and also is not needed in general,
especially not to switch between immediate feedback mode and early feedback
mode. The latest understanding of the RFC is that from the endpoint point of
view, both modes are exactly the same. RTCP is only allowed to use the
bandwidth as given by the RFC constraints, as such it is only ever possible
to schedule a RTCP packet early but it's against the RFC to schedule more RTCP
packets.
The difference between immediate feedback mode and early feedback mode is that
the former guarantees that an RTCP packet can be sent for every event
"immediately", which means that the bandwidth calculations from the RFC have
resulted in an RTCP scheduling interval that is small enough. Early feedback
mode on the other hand means that we can schedule some packets early to make
that happen, but it's not guaranteed at all that it's possible to schedule
an RTCP packet per event (i.e. they need to be accumulated or dropped).
This indicates with a boolean return value if scheduling a new RTCP packet
within the requested delay was possible. Otherwise it behaves exactly like
send-rtcp. The only reason for adding a new signal is ABI compatibility.
We (currently?) can't really handle gaps between RTP packets if they're not
properly timestamped. The current code would go into calculations with
GST_CLOCK_TIME_NONE and then cause assertions everywhere. It's probably
better to error out cleanly instead.
