They are very confusing for people, and more often than not
also just not very accurate. Seeing 'last reviewed: 2005' in
your docs is not very confidence-inspiring. Let's just remove
those comments.
This prevents situations where a first branch would get seeked and
receive a buffer before all branches got seeked, and thus collected
would get called based on EOS from the previous segment.
As a consequence, during the process of seeking, don't decrease
the eospads number when a FLUSH_STOP is received.
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724571
* fix typo GstBufferFlag -> GstBufferFlags
* fix typo GstFeatures -> GstCapsFeatures
* fix typo GstAllocatorParams -> GstAllocationParams
* fix typo GstContrlSources -> GstControlSource
* do not refer to gstcheck as an object
* make references gtk_init() and tcase_set_timeout() not be references
* gst_element_get_pad() renamed gst_element_get_static_pad()
* gst_clock_id_wait_async_full() renamed gst_clock_id_wait_async()
* _drop_element() is really gst_queue_array_drop_element()
* gst_pad_accept_caps() was removed, do not refer to it
* separate GST_META_TAG_MEMORY_STR declaration from description
* do not describe removed gst_collect_pads_collect()
* correctly link to GstElementClass' virtual set_context()
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719614
pads->data is the public list. It is dynamically rebuilt at each call to
check_collected, in check_pads to be specific. When you add a pad and
collectpads have been started, it is not added to the public list.
Thus there exists a possible race where :
1) You would add a pad to collectpads while running.
2) You set collectpads to flushing before check_collected has been called again
-> the pad is not set to flushing
3) the pad starts pushing data as downstream might not be prepared, in the case
of adder it then returns FLOW_FLUSHING.
4) elements like demuxers, when they get a FLOW_FLUSHING, stop their tasks,
never to be seen again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708636
If a pad is removed while a collectpads element (say adder) is in a chain
function waiting to be collected, there is a possibility that an unref happens
on a NULL pointer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707536
Importantly, this patch converts DTS to running time. Less importantly,
and possibly a problem for some muxers, is that it orders buffers by
DTS (if it is valid, otherwise PTS). This is generally correct, but
might be somewhat surprising to muxers.
Also note that once converted to running time, DTS can end up negative.
It's not right, and we don't know what extra properties
that event might have set in future (e.g. sparseness).
This change means collectpad users need to create their
own stream-start event now. We could add a utility
function that creates a stream-start event based on
the input stream-start events.
Add private replacements for deprecated functions such as
g_mutex_new(), g_mutex_free(), g_cond_new() etc., mostly
to avoid the deprecation warnings. We can't change most of
these in 0.10 because they're part of our API and ABI.
Improve GstSegment, rename some fields. The idea is to have the GstSegment
structure represent the timing structure of the buffers as they are generated by
the source or demuxer element.
gst_segment_set_seek() -> gst_segment_do_seek()
Rename the NEWSEGMENT event to SEGMENT.
Make parsing of the SEGMENT event into a GstSegment structure.
Pass a GstSegment structure when making a new SEGMENT event. This allows us to
pass the timing info directly to the next element. No accumulation is needed in
the receiving element, all the info is inside the element.
Remove gst_segment_set_newsegment(): This function as used to accumulate
segments received from upstream, which is now not needed anymore because the
segment event contains the complete timing information.
