In gst_gl_window_cocoa_draw we used to just call setNeedsDisplay:YES. That was
creating an implicit CA transaction which was getting committed at the next
runloop iteration. Since we don't know how often the main runloop is running,
and when we run it implicitly (from gst_gl_window_cocoa_nsapp_iteration) we only
do so every 200ms, use an explicit CA transaction instead and commit it
immediately. CA transactions nest and debounce automatically so this will never
result in extra work.
Depending on the platform, it was only ever implemented to 1) set a
default surface size, 2) resize based on the video frame or 3) nothing.
Instead, provide a set_preferred_size () that elements/applications
can use to request a certain size which may be ignored for
videooverlay/other cases.
Removes the use of NSOpenGL* variety and functions. Any Cocoa
specific functions that took/returned a NSOpenGL* object now
take/return the CGL equivalents.
Otherwise interesting things will happen in Cocoa applications, like
infinite event loops that block the NSApplication loop forever.
This was only needed for GNUStep and thus can safely be removed now.
Until gcc and GNUStep properly support Objective-C blocks and other
"new" features of Objective-C we can't properly support them without
making the code much more ugly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739152
Otherwise when resizing the window you will also get messages like:
class NSConcreteMapTable autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class NSConcreteValue autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class NSConcreteValue autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
class __NSCFDictionary autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
Need to set the ':' as the reshape method now takes one parameter.
For the story, the GstGLNSView was previously inheriting from
NSOpenGLView which has a reshape function without any parameter.
Now the GstGLNSView inherits from NSView and we re-use the reshape
function manually.
Use the reshape function after being defined. The other way
would have been to declare the reshape function in the header.
gstglwindow_cocoa.m: In function '-[GstGLNSView drawRect:]':
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: 'GstGLNSView' may not respond to '-reshape'
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: (Messages without a matching method signature
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: will be assumed to return 'id' and accept
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: '...' as arguments.)
gstglwindow_cocoa.m: In function '-[GstGLNSView drawRect:]':
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: 'GstGLNSView' may not respond to '-reshape'
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: (Messages without a matching method signature
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: will be assumed to return 'id' and accept
gstglwindow_cocoa.m:555: warning: '...' as arguments.)
Using NSApp directly seems to confuse something, as the compiler
was expecting an id<NSFileManagerDelegate>. Switched to using
[NSApplication sharedApplication], and specified the delegate
protocol on the window class as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738740
The visible rect and bounds might be the same as before, but Cocoa
might've changed our viewport without us nothing. This happens if
you hide the view and show it again.
"(NSApplication *)sharedApplication This method also makes a connection
to the window server and completes other initialization"
The implicit thing which is not mentioned is that it required
to be called in the main thread.
Fix a regression introduces by 82b7c915bb
When using with gst-launch, it was not possible to click on the close
cross of the window anymore which is a bit anoying and also because
it's was possible before.
Prior to this commit the GstGLContextCocoaClass was initialized
in the main thread because gst_gl_context_new was called in the
state change function from going from ready to paused.
From this commit this call is done from the streaming thread.
So that the call to [NSApplication sharedApplication];
was not done in the main thread anymore.
We now ensure that by assuming there is a GMainLoop running.
It's for debugging purpose so that's ok to do that. Also
note we already do this assumtion to run app itereations.
The regression had no consequence on the cocoa/videooverlay example
(that should be moved from gst-plugins-gl to -bad) because the
application is responsible for that necessary call.
