This carries over code for a similar test from multiqueue to ensure full
control over the dataflow while testing. (The previous attempt was racy
since the fill level changed without any thread sync with the test code.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771210
low/high-watermark are of type double, and given in range 0.0-1.0. This
makes it possible to set low/high watermarks with greater resolution,
which is useful with large multiqueue max sizes and watermarks like 0.5%.
Also adding a test to check the fill and watermark level behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770628
low/high-watermark are of type double, and given in range 0.0-1.0. This
makes it possible to set low/high watermarks with greater resolution,
which is useful with large queue2 max sizes and watermarks like 0.5%.
Also adding a test to check the fill and watermark level behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769449
gst_check_setup_sink_pad() internally uses gst_check_chain_func() so we
should call gst_check_drop_buffers() when tearing down tests to free the
buffers which have been exchanged through the pipeline.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765903
This ensures the following special case is handled properly:
1. Queue is empty
2. Data is pushed, fill level is below the current high-threshold
3. high-threshold is set to a level that is below the current fill level
Since mq->percent wasn't being recalculated in step #3 properly, this
caused the multiqueue to switch off its buffering state when new data is
pushed in, and never post a 100% buffering message. The application will
have received a <100% buffering message from step #2, but will never see
100%.
Fix this by recalculating the current fill level percentage during
high-threshold property changes in the same manner as it is done when
use-buffering is modified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763757
Changing states up and down while buffers are being pushed is not
a valid use case. If a pad is deactivated and reactivated during
a buffer push it is racy with the check of pushed sticky events
and the actual chainfunction call. As it might call the chain
without noticing the peer pad lost its previous sticky events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758340
Iterator may need to be resynced, for instance if pads are released
during state change.
got_eos should be protected by the object lock of the element, not of
the pad, as is the case throughout the rest of the funnel code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755343
Writing a test for unscheduling the gst_clock_id_wait inside the
identity element, found an invalid read, caused by removing the clock-id
when calling _unschedule instead of letting the code calling _wait remove
the clock-id after being unscheduled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752055
Update test_seeking testcase to verify the render and render_list
virtual method handle buffers and buffer list containing multiple
memory blocks correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747223
GstFileSink implements the render_list virtual method to render
a list of buffers. Update the test_seeking test case to also
check the render_list method implementation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747100
This property avoids not linked error when all the pads are unlinked
or when there are no source pads. This is useful in dynamic pipelines
where it can happen that for a short time there are no pads at all or
all downstream pads are not linked yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746436
3 new tests:
1) Tests that a stream that is empty (just an EOS event)
on inactive pad doesn't get through and tamper
with the active pad that still has data
2) Tests that a stream that is shorter than the active one
(pushes EOS earlier) doesn't has its EOS pushed
3) Tests that switching to an inactive stream that has received
EOS will make input-selector push EOS
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746518
Demultiplex a stream to multiple source pads based on the stream ids from the
stream-start events. This basically reverses the behaviour of funnel.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707605
In this mode we accept previously set filter caps until
upstream renegotiates to something that is compatible
to the current filter caps.
This allows dynamic caps changes in the pipeline even
if there is a queue between any conversion element
and the capsfilter. Without this we would get not-negotiated
errors if timing is bad.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739002
Make pipe socket non-blocking, so we don't
end up being blocked in a write on the pipe
while the src is eos and not reading data
any more, and thus we never unblock and never
notice that we're done. This would happen
quite reliably on the rpi.
When no data is coming from sinkpads and eos events
arrived at one of the sinkpad, funnel forwards the EOS
event to downstream. It forwards the EOS because lastsink pad
is NULL. Also the unit testcase of the funnel is not checking
the correct behavior as it should. The unit test case should
fail if one of the sink pad has already EOS present on it and
we are trying to push one more EOS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731716
