IDLE probes that are directly called when being added will increase /
decrease the "number of IDLE probes running" counter around the call,
but when running from the streaming thread this won't happen.
This has the effect that when running from a streaming thread it is
possible to push serialized events or data out of the pad without
problems, but otherwise it would deadlock because serialized data would
wait for the IDLE probe to finish first (it is blocking after all!).
With this change it will now always consistently deadlock instead of
just every once in a while, which should make it obvious why this
happens and prevent racy deadlocks in application code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796895
This reverts commit 11e0f451eb.
When pushing a sticky event out of a pad with a pad probe or pad offset,
those should not be applied to the event that is actually stored in the
event but only in the event sent downstream. The pad probe and pad
offsets are conceptually *after* the pad, added by external code and
should not affect any internal state of pads/elements.
Also storing the modified event has the side-effect that a re-sent event
would arrive with any previous modifications done by the same pad probe
again inside that pad probe, and it would have to check if its
modifications are already applied or not.
For sink pads and generally for events arriving in a pad, some further
changes are still needed and those are tracked in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765049
In addition, the commit also had a refcounting problem with events,
causing already destroyed events to be stored inside pads.
Probes were remembering a cookie that was used to check if the probe was
already called this time before the probes list changed. However the
same probes could've been called by another thread in between and thus
gotten a new cookie, and would then be called a second time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795987
In the case where the user sets a new padprobeinfo->data in a probe
where the data is a sticky event, the new sticky event should be automatically
sticked on the probed pad.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795330
The following case can happen when two thread try to activate and
deactivate a pad at the same time:
T1: starts to deactivate, calls pre_activate(), sets in_activation
to TRUE and carries on
T2: starts to activate, calls pre_activate(), in_activation is TRUE
so it waits on the GCond
T1: calls post_activate(), tries to acquire the streaming lock ..
but can't because T2 is currently holding it
With this patch, the deadlock will no longer happen but does not
solve the problem that:
T2: will resume activation of the pad, set the pad mode to the target
one (PUSH or PULL) and eventually the streaming lock gets released.
T1: is able to finish calling post_activate() ... but ... the pad
wasn't deactivated (T2 was the last one to "activate" the pad.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792341
When actually pushing an event, if we get GST_FLOW_CUSTOM_SUCCESS_1
(which is the conversion of GST_PAD_PROBE_HANDLED return value),
don't consider the stick event push as ignored, but as handled
Checking that the pad is in the correct mode before the parent is
checked makes the call always succeed if the mode is ok.
This fixes a race with ghostpad where gst_pad_activate_mode() could
trigger a g_critical() if the ghostpad is unparented while the
proxypad is deactivating, for instance if the ghostpad is released.
More specifically, gst_ghost_pad_internal_activate_push_default()'s
call to gst_pad_activate_mode() would fail if ghostpad doesn't have a
parent. With this patch it will return true of mode is already
correct.
The following could happen previously:
* T1: calls gst_pad_set_active()
* T2: currently (de)activating it
* T1: gst_pad_set_active() returns, caller assumes that the pad has
completed the requested (de)activation ... whereas it is not
the case since the actual (de)activation in T2 might still be
going on.
To ensure atomicity of pad (de)activation, we use a internal
variable (and cond) to ensure only one thread at a time goes through
the actual (de)activation block
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790431
checking whether we already were in the target GstPadMode was being
done too early and there was the risk that we *would* end up
(de)activating a pad more than once.
Instead, re-do the check for pad mode when entering the final pad
(de)activation block.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790431
If multiple probes are set on a pad and one probe returns either
GST_PAD_PROBE_HANDLED or GST_PAD_PROBE_DROPPED we need to stop
calling the remaining probes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787243
Without the former, event changes (e.g. setting a pad offset) does not
take effect for the current buffer but only for the next one. Without
the latter, non-blocking event probes would not see any updated events
yet.
After b76ecfd992 introduced
GST_PAD_FLAG_ACCEPT_TEMPLATE, the performance penalty this
message is refering to (the cascading ACCEPT_CAPS query)
only applies to the cases where !GST_PAD_IS_ACCEPT_TEMPLATE
Enable it to prevent sending reconfigure when linking elements.
Useful for autoplugging when we know caps or bufferpools shouldn't change
to save doing caps renegotiation to end up with the same final scenario.
The no-reconfigure is not a proper check, it is a flag. It is implemented
as a GstPadLinkCheck to avoid creating another gst_pad_link variant.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757653
A new event which precedes EOS in situations where we
need downstream to unblock any pads waiting on a stream
before we can send EOS. E.g, decodebin draining a chain
so it can switch pads.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768995
If there is only one pad in the internal pads, when folding for
LATENCY queries it will just drop the response if it's not live.
This is maybe not the proper fix, but it will just accept the first
peer responses, and if there are any other pads, it will only take
them into account if the response is live.
This *should* properly handle the aggregation/folding behaviour of
multiple live peer responses, while at the same time handling the
simple one-pad-only-and-forward use-case
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766360
When activating a pad in PULL mode, it might already be in PUSH mode. We now
first try to deactivate it from PUSH mode and then try to activate it in PULL
mode. If the activation fails, we would set the pad to flushing and set it
back to its old mode. However the old mode is wrong, the pad is not in PUSH
mode anymore but in NONE mode.
This fixes e.g. typefind in decodebin reactivating PUSH/PULL mode if upstream
actually fails to go into PULL mode after first PUSHING data to typefind.
Updated the GST_REFCOUNTING logging so that it includes the pointer
address of the object that is being disposed or finalized.
With this change is is then possible to match up GST_REFCOUNTING log messages
for object allocation/disposal/finalization. This can help with diagnosing
"memory leaks" in applications that have not correctly disposed of all the
GStreamer objects it creates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749427
PUSH and PULL mode have opposite scenarios for IDLE and BLOCK
probes.
For PUSH it will BLOCK with some data type and IDLE won't have a type.
For PULL it will BLOCK before getting some data and will be IDLE when
some data is obtained.
The check in hook_marshall was specific for PUSH mode and would cause
PULL probes to fail to be called. Adding different checks for the mode
to fix this issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761211
When going from READY to NULL all element pads are deactivated. If
simultaneously the pad is being removed from the element with
gst_element_remove_pad() and the pad is unparented, there is a race
where the deactivation will assert (g_critical) if the parent is lost at
the wrong time.
The proposed fix will check parent only once and retain it to avoid the
race.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761912
Validate that the proxy pad indeed accepts the caps by also
comparing with the pad template caps, otherwise when the pad
had no internally linked pads it would always return true.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754112
Instead of re-sending sticky events over and over to a not-linked
pad, mark them as sent the first time. If the not-linked came from
downstream, it already received the events. If the pad is actually
not-linked, the sticky events will be rescheduled when the
pad is linked anyway.
