Otherwise we will have 10s-100s of thread wakeups in feedback profiles, create
RTCP packets, etc. just to suppress them in 99% of the cases (i.e. if no
feedback is actually pending and no regular RTCP has to be sent).
This improves CPU usage and battery life quite a lot.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746543
If we may suppress the packet due to the rules of RFC4585 (i.e. when
below the t-rr-int), we can send a smaller RTCP packet without RRs
and full SDES. In theory we could even send a minimal RTCP packet
according to RFC5506, but we don't support that yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746543
Otherwise we can't properly schedule RTCP in feedback profiles as we need to
distinguish the time when we last checked for sending RTCP (tp) but might have
suppressed it, and the time when we last actually sent a non-early RTCP
packet.
This together with the other changes should now properly implement RTCP
scheduling according to RFC4585, and especially allow us to send feedback
packets a lot if needed but only send regular RTCP packets every once in a
while.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746543
And modify our RTCP scheduling algorithm accordingly. We now can send more
RTCP packets if needed for feedback, but will throttle full RTCP packets by
rtcp-min-interval (t-rr-int from RFC4585).
In non-feedback mode, rtcp-min-interval is Tmin from RFC3550, which is
statically set to 1s or 0s by RFC4585. Tmin defines how often we should
send RTCP packets at most.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746543
It might just be a late retransmission or spurious packet from elsewhere, but
resetting everything would mean that we will cause a noticeable hickup. Let's
get some confidence first that the sequence numbers changed for whatever
reason.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747922
This reverts commit d22ec49632.
Application code might expect that it only gets external sources on those
signals, and get confused by this. If anything we would need to add new
signals.
Without this it seems impossible for an application to easily get notified
about the internal ssrcs that are created, e.g. sender sources, and also
to know when they are active and produce RTCP packets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746747
We now take the maximum of 2*jitter and 0.5*packet_spacing for the extra
delay. If jitter is very low, this should prevent unnecessary retransmission
requests to some degree.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748041
This also happens in the very beginning when we receive the first packet, a
warning would be very confusing here. In all places where we should warn about
this, we would've printed a warning already before.
Right above we consider lost_packet packets, each of them having duration,
as lost and triggered their timers immediately. Below we use expected_dts
to schedule retransmission or schedule lost timers for the packets that
come after expected_dts.
As we just triggered lost_packets packets as lost, there's no point in
scheduling new timers for them and we can just skip over all lost packets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739868
Resetting the jitterbuffer drops all packets and other things, and will cause
a discontinuity in the packets received by the depayloaders. They should now
also flush anything they had pending as the new data will start at a different
position.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739868
Make sure that the sync_src pad has caps before the segment event.
Otherwise we might get a segment event before caps from the receive
RTCP pad, and then later when receiving RTCP packets will set caps.
This will results in a sticky event misordering warning
This fixes warnings in the rtpaux unit test but also in the
rtpaux and rtx examples in tests/examples/rtp
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746445
Before we only started it when either:
- there is no send RTP stream
or
- we received an RTP packet for sending
This could mean that if the send RTP pads are connected but never receive any
RTP data, and the same session is also used for receiving RTP/RTCP, we would
never start the RTCP thread and would never send RTCP for the receiving part
of the session.
This can be reproduced with a pipeline like:
gst-launch-1.0 rtpbin name=rtpbin \
udpsrc port=5000 ! "application/x-rtp, media=video, clock-rate=90000, encoding-name=H264" ! rtpbin.recv_rtp_sink_0 \
udpsrc port=5001 ! rtpbin.recv_rtcp_sink_0 \
rtpbin.send_rtcp_src_0 ! fakesink name=rtcp_fakesink silent=false async=false sync=false \
rtpbin.recv_rtp_src_0_2553225531_96 ! decodebin ! xvimagesink \
fakesrc ! valve drop=true ! rtpbin.send_rtp_sink_0 \
rtpbin.send_rtp_src_0 ! fakesink name=rtp_fakesink silent=false async=false sync=false -v
Before this change the rtcp_fakesink would never send RTCP for the receiving
part of the session (i.e. no receiver reports!), after the change it does.
And before and after this change it would send RTCP for the receiving part of
the session if the sender part was omitted (the last two lines).
These are outside the expected range of sequence numbers and should be
clipped, especially for RTSP they might belong to packets from before a seek
or a previous stream in general.
