h264parse and gstrtph264depay do the same, let's keep the behaviour
consistent. As we now include the codec_data inside the stream, this causes
less caps renegotiation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753228
rtph264depay does the same and this fixes decoding of some streams with 32
SPS (or 256 PPS). It is allowed to have SPS ID 0 to 31 (or PPS ID 0 to 255),
but the field in the codec_data for the number of SPS or PPS is only 5
(or 8) bit. As such, 32 SPS (or 256 PPS) are interpreted as 0 everywhere.
This looks like a mistake in the part of the spect about the codec_data.
This causes an assertion and would lead to getting a NULL instead
of a buffer. Without proper checking this would easily lead to a
segfault.
Related to rpth264depay: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737199
type is truncated to 0-31 with "& 0x1f", but right after that it is checks if
the value is equivalent to GST_H265_NAL_VPS, GST_H265_NAL_SPS, and
GST_H265_NAL_PPS (which are 32, 33, and 34 respectively). Obviously, this will
never be True if the value is maximum 31 after the truncation.
The intention of the code was to truncate to 0-63.
After further investigation the previous commit is wrong. The code intended to
check if the type is 39 or the ranges 41-44 and 48-55. Just like gsth265parse.c
does. Type 40 would not be complete.
nal_type is the index for a GstH265NalUnitType enum. There are two types of dead
code here:
First, after checking if nal_type is >= 39 there are two OR conditionals that
check if the value is in ranges higher than that number, so if nal_type >= 39
falls in the True branch those other conditions aren't checked and if it falls
in the False branch and they are checked, they will always also be False. They
are redundant.
Second, the enum has a range of 0 to 40. So the checks for ranges higher than 41
should never be True.
Removing this redundant checks.
CID 1249684
