Fix doc chunks to not use that syntax for links that have the
url as description, it will be put verbatim into the xml/*.xml
file and then the expat parser will throw a syntax error like:
File "../../common/mangle-db.py", line 71, in <module>
main()
File "../../common/mangle-db.py", line 69, in main
patch (details.replace("-details", ""), os.path.basename(details))
File "../../common/mangle-db.py", line 20, in patch
doc = xml.dom.minidom.parse(related)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/xml/dom/minidom.py", line 1918, in parse
return expatbuilder.parse(file)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/xml/dom/expatbuilder.py", line 924, in parse
result = builder.parseFile(fp)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/xml/dom/expatbuilder.py", line 207, in parseFile
parser.Parse(buffer, 0)
xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 84, column 7
ULP FEC, as defined in RFC 5109, has the protected and protection
packets sharing the same ssrc, and a different payload type, and
implies rewriting the seqnums of the protected stream when encoding
the protection packets. This has the unfortunate drawback of not
being able to tell whether a lost packet was a protection packet.
rtpbasedepayload relies on gaps in the seqnums to set the DISCONT
flag on buffers it outputs. Before that commit, this created two
problems:
* The protection packets don't make it as far as the depayloader,
which means it will mark buffers as DISCONT every time the previous
packets were protected
* While we could work around the previous issue by looking at
the protection packets ignored and dropped in rtpptdemux, we
would still mark buffers as DISCONT when a FEC packet was lost,
as we cannot know that it was indeed a FEC packet, even though
this should have no impact on the decoding of the stream
With this commit, we consider that when using ULPFEC, gaps in
the seqnums are not a reliable indicator of whether buffers should
be marked as DISCONT or not, and thus rewrite the seqnums on
the decoding side as well to form a perfect sequence, this
obviously doesn't prevent the jitterbuffer from doing its job
as the ulpfec decoder is downstream from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794909
The ulpfecenc "mux-seq" and "ssrc" properties were initially added
because the element did more than implement ULPFEC. As it was
decided that FLEXFEC would be implemented in a separate element,
both properties are now unneeded and confusing.
Change the default for the ulpfecenc multi-packet property,
as it is expected that most users of this element will be protecting video
streams.
Change the default property for the rtpredenc allow-no-red-blocks
property, as it should also be its default mode of operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793843
We expose a set of new elements:
* ULPFEC encoder / decoder
* A storage element, which should be placed before jitterbuffers,
and is used to store packets in order to attempt reconstruction
after the jitterbuffer has sent PacketLost events
* RED encoder / decoder (RFC 2198), these are necessary to
use FEC in webrtc, as browsers will propose and expect ulpfec
packets to be wrapped in red packets
With contributions from:
Mathieu Duponchelle <mathieu@centricular.com>
Sebastian Dröge <sebastian@centricular.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792696
