Store the eos event seqnum and use it when creating the
new eos event to be pushed downstream. To know if the eos
was caused by the eos events received on send_event, a
'forced_eos' flag is used to use the correct seqnum on
the event pushed downstream.
Useful if the application wants to check if the EOS message
was generated from its own pushed EOS or from another source
(stream really finished).
Also adds a test for this
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722791
In the case where one singlequeue is full and all other are not linked, the
growing of the full queue does not work correctly. The result depends on if
the full queue is last in the queue list or not.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722891
This way we make sure that a) the lock is always taken when checking
the cookie and calling the iterator's next functions and b) it is
not taken while calling any of the iterator filter functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711138
events_foreach adds an extra ref when giving the event to the
user function. In case it was unrefed by the user, this extra ref
disappeared, but events_foreach still should unref again to
lose its own ref before removing the event from the array.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722467
It is already stored inside the GstSegment struct and
was only duplicating information. Also removed some
weird positon if/else that would possibly change the
segment that was going to be pushed downstream
When prerolling/buffering, multiqueue has its buffers limit set
to 0, this means it can take an infinite amount of buffers.
When prerolling/buffering finishes, its limit is set back to 5, but
only if the current level is lower than 5. It should (almost) never be
and this will cause prerolling/buffering to need to wait to reach the
hard bytes and time limits, which are much higher.
This can lead to a very long startup time. This patch fixes this
by setting the single queues to the max(current, new_value) instead
of simply ignoring the new value and letting it as infinite(0)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712597
Make this work again:
audiotestsrc ! tee name=t t.src_0 ! queue ! fakesink t.src_1 ! queue ! fakesink
and this fail again:
audiotestsrc ! tee name=t t.src_1 ! queue ! fakesink t.src_0 ! queue ! fakesink
as tee just counts itself and does not care about the pad names we request
from it.
Baseparse stores buffers for reverse playback to push on the next
DISCONT, the issue was that it wouldn't ever check for a discont
on passthrough mode as it skips all real parsing. This test
was create to verify this issue and prevent it from happening again
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721941
If on passthrough during reverse playback, do not accumulate buffers as
baseparse will never check for DISCONT flag to push those buffers.
So just push buffers downstream as if it was forward playback.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721941
TIME segments are being ignored and a standard initialized
segment is used instead. This causes issues as not properly detecting
reverse playback or not cliping output based on the segment.
This seems to be a regression from one of the GstSegment/GstEvent
redesigns on the 0.10 -> 1.0 transition
The offset can be -1 when we are configured in TIME format. Instead of
failing the seek and erroring, do what and offset of -1 is supposed to
do and simply read from the current offset.
It wasn't required, instead baseparse was using it to check the media
caps to identify if it was handling audio or video.
The pending_segment was removed and a checked_media boolean
replaced it for a more accurate naming.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721350
A GAP event is handled as an empty buffer by sinks and they expect
to receive start up events before GAP events (like a segment).
This is important specially if there is a GAP at the beginning of
a stream (before any buffers) so that the segment event can be
pushed downstream before the GAP
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721350
This allows blocking a pad, add a new blocking probe, removing
the first probe and then having the second probe called. Which
could then decide that data-flow should actually continue
instead of blocking now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721289
