vaapipostproc: params video_info_changed() callers

The signature is video_info_changed(old_vip, new_vip). Nonetheless the callers
swapped the the order. This didn't raise problems since the comparison of both
structures were not affected by its semantics.

But still it would be better to fix this to keep the coherence of the code.

Signed-off-by: Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal <victorx.jaquez@intel.com>

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758007
This commit is contained in:
Víctor Manuel Jáquez Leal 2015-11-12 16:13:25 +01:00
parent fc8a0d121c
commit fc958520c3

View file

@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ gst_vaapipostproc_update_sink_caps (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps,
if (!gst_video_info_from_caps (&vi, caps))
return FALSE;
if (video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->sinkpad_info))
if (video_info_changed (&postproc->sinkpad_info, &vi))
postproc->sinkpad_info = vi, *caps_changed_ptr = TRUE;
deinterlace = is_deinterlace_enabled (postproc, &vi);
@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ gst_vaapipostproc_update_src_caps (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps,
if (!gst_video_info_from_caps (&vi, caps))
return FALSE;
if (video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->srcpad_info))
if (video_info_changed (&postproc->srcpad_info, &vi))
postproc->srcpad_info = vi, *caps_changed_ptr = TRUE;
if (postproc->format != GST_VIDEO_INFO_FORMAT (&postproc->sinkpad_info) &&
@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ ensure_srcpad_buffer_pool (GstVaapiPostproc * postproc, GstCaps * caps)
GST_VIDEO_INFO_WIDTH (&vi), GST_VIDEO_INFO_HEIGHT (&vi));
if (postproc->filter_pool
&& !video_info_changed (&vi, &postproc->filter_pool_info))
&& !video_info_changed (&postproc->filter_pool_info, &vi))
return TRUE;
postproc->filter_pool_info = vi;