Fixes for cross-compilation

Original commit message from CVS:
Fixes for cross-compilation
This commit is contained in:
David Schleef 2003-01-11 00:27:29 +00:00
parent e85f1bed4e
commit e9bae927c1

View file

@ -110,7 +110,11 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
])
dnl check for makecontext and define HAVE_MAKECONTEXT if we have it
GST_CHECK_MAKECONTEXT()
AC_CHECK_MCSC()
if test "$ac_cv_check_mcsc" == "yes"; then
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_MAKECONTEXT, $HAVE_MAKECONTEXT,
[defined if we have makecontext ()])
fi
dnl Check for a way to display the function name in debug output
GST_CHECK_FUNCTION()
@ -153,12 +157,12 @@ GST_CHECK_LIBHEADER(POPT, popt, poptStrippedArgv,, popt.h, POPT_LIBS="-lpopt",
ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-4.0.x/])
)
AC_MSG_NOTICE(Checking for POPT_TABLEEND)
AC_TRY_RUN([
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([
#include <popt.h>
int main ()
{
#ifndef POPT_TABLEEND
return 1;
#error
#else
return 0;
#endif
@ -176,7 +180,7 @@ dnl defines the wrong default symbol as well (HAVE_ASM_ATOMIC_H)
AC_CHECK_HEADER(asm/atomic.h, HAVE_ATOMIC_H=yes, HAVE_ATOMIC_H=no)
dnl Do a compile to check that it has atomic_set (eg, linux 2.0 didn't)
if test x$HAVE_ATOMIC_H = xyes; then
AC_TRY_RUN([
AC_LINK_IFELSE([
#include "asm/atomic.h"
main() {atomic_t t; atomic_set(&t,0); atomic_inc(&t); atomic_add(1,&t);return 0;}
],, [
@ -185,10 +189,6 @@ main() { atomic_t t; atomic_set(&t,0); atomic_inc(&t); atomic_add(1,&t);return 0
AC_MSG_WARN(Atomic reference counting is out of date: doing without.)
fi
HAVE_ATOMIC_H=no
], [
# Cross compiling
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
AC_MSG_WARN(Can't check properly for atomic reference counting. Assuming OK.)
])
fi