mirrors/gstreamer
mirrors/gstreamer
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer.git synced 2024-11-26 11:41:09 +00:00
Code Issues 1 Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs/pwg/other-ntoone.xml: Document muxers and n-to-1 elements.

Browse source 
Original commit message from CVS:
* docs/pwg/other-ntoone.xml:
Document muxers and n-to-1 elements.
This commit is contained in:
Ronald S. Bultje 2004-04-02 01:12:37 +00:00
parent 73b88d064e
commit d7c4997565
2 changed files with 242 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2004-04-01 Ronald Bultje <rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net>
* docs/pwg/other-ntoone.xml:
Document muxers and n-to-1 elements.
2004-04-01 Martin Soto <martinsoto@users.sourceforge.net>
* gst/registries/gstxmlregistry.c

243
docs/pwg/other-ntoone.xml
View file

@ -1,16 +1,247 @@
<!-- ############ chapter ############# -->
<chapter id="chapter-other-ntoone" xreflabel="Writing a N-to-1 Element">
<title>Writing a N-to-1 Element</title>
<chapter id="chapter-other-ntoone" xreflabel="Writing a N-to-1 Element or Demuxer">
<title>Writing a N-to-1 Element or Demuxer</title>
<para>
FIXME: write.
N-to-1 elements have been previously mentioned and discussed in both
<xref linkend="chapter-advanced-request"/> and in
<xref linkend="chapter-loopbased-loopfn"/>. The main noteworthy thing
about N-to-1 elements is that they should <emphasis>always</emphasis>,
without any single exception, be <function>_loop ()</function>-based.
Apart from that, there is not much general that you need to know. We
will discuss one special type of N-to-1 elements here, these being
muxers. The first two of these sections apply to N-to-1 elements in
general, though.
</para>
<sect1 id="section-other-muxer" xreflabel="Writing a Muxer">
<title>Writing a Muxer</title>
<sect1 id="section-muxer-dataloop" xreflabel="The Data Loop Function">
<title>The Data Loop Function</title>
<para>
WRITEME
As previously mentioned in <xref linkend="chapter-loopbased-loopfn"/>,
N-to-1 elements generally try to have one buffer from each sink pad
and then handle the one with the earliest timestamp. There's some
exceptions to this rule, we will come to those later. This only works
if all streams actually continuously provide input. There might be
cases where this is not true, for example subtitles (there might be
no subtitle for a while), overlay images and so forth. For this
purpose, there is a <function>_select ()</function> function in
&GStreamer;. It checks whether input is available on a (list of)
pad(s). In this way, you can skip over the pads that are 'non-
continuous'.
</para>
<programlisting>
/* Pad selection is currently broken, FIXME some day */
</programlisting>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="section-muxer-events" xreflabel="Events in the Loop Function">
<title>Events in the Loop Function</title>
<para>
N-to-1 elements using a cache will sometimes receive events, and it
is often unclear how to handle those. For example, how do you seek
to a frame in an <emphasis>output</emphasis> file (and what's the
point of it anyway)? So, do discontinuity or seek events make sense,
and should you use them?
</para>
<sect2 id="section-muxevents-discont" xreflabel="Discontinuities and flushes">
<title>Discontinuities and flushes</title>
<para>
Don't do anything. They specify a discontinuity in the output, and
you should continue to playback as you would otherwise. You
generally do not need to put a discontinuity in the output stream
in muxers; you would have to manually start adapting timestamps of
output frames (if appliccable) to match the previous timescale,
though. Note that the output data stream should be continuous. For
other types of N-to-1-elements, it is generally fine to forward
the discontinuity once it has been received from all pads. This
depends on the specific element.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="section-muxevents-seek" xreflabel="Seeks">
<title>Seeks</title>
<para>
Depends on the element. Muxers would generally not implement this,
because the concept of seeking in an <emphasis>output</emphasis>
stream at frame level is not very useful. Seeking at byte level
can be useful, but that is more generally done
<emphasis>by</emphasis> muxers <emphasis>on</emphasis> sink
elements.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="section-muxevents-eos" xreflabel="End-of-Stream">
<title>End-of-Stream</title>
<para>
Speaks for itself.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="section-muxer-negotiation" xreflabel="Negotiation">
<title>Negotiation</title>
<para>
Most container formats will have a fair amount of issues with
changing content on an elementary stream. Therefore, you should
not allow caps to be changed once you've started using data from
them. The easiest way to achieve this is by using explicit caps,
which have been explained before. However, we're going to use them
in a slightly different way then what you're used to, having the
core do all the work for us.
</para>
<para>
The idea is that, as long as the stream/file headers have not been
written yet and no data has been processed yet, a stream is allowed
to renegotiate. After that point, the caps should be fixed, because
we can only use a stream once. Caps may then only change within an
allowed range (think MPEG, where changes in FPS are allowed), or
sometimes not at all (such as AVI audio). In order to do that, we
will, after data retrieval and header writing, set an explicit caps
on each sink pad, that is the minimal caps describing the properties
of the format that may not change. As an example, for MPEG audio
inside an MPEG system stream, this would mean a wide caps of
audio/mpeg with mpegversion=1 and layer=[1,2]. For the same audio type
in MPEG, though, the samplerate, bitrate, layer and number of channels
would become static, too. Since the (request) pads will be removed
when the stream ends, the static caps will cease to exist too, then.
While the explicit caps exist, the <function>_link ()</function>-
function will not be called, since the core will do all necessary
checks for us. Note that the property of using explicit caps should
be added along with the actual explicit caps, not any earlier.
</para>
<para>
Below here follows the simple example of an AVI muxer's audio caps
negotiation. The <function>_link ()</function>-function is fairly
normal, but the <function>-Loop ()</function>-function does some of
the tricks mentioned above. There is no <function>_getcaps ()</function>-
function since the pad template contains all that information already
(not shown).
</para>
<programlisting>
static GstPadLinkReturn
gst_avi_mux_audio_link (GstPad *pad,
const GstCaps *caps)
{
GstAviMux *mux = GST_AVI_MUX (gst_pad_get_parent (pad));
GstStructure *str = gst_caps_get_structure (caps, 0);
const gchar *mime = gst_structure_get_name (str);
if (!strcmp (str, "audio/mpeg")) {
/* get version, make sure it's 1, get layer, make sure it's 1-3,
* then create the 2-byte audio tag (0x0055) and fill an audio
* stream structure (strh/strf). */
[..]
return GST_PAD_LINK_OK;
} else if !strcmp (str, "audio/x-raw-int")) {
/* See above, but now with the raw audio tag (0x0001). */
[..]
return GST_PAD_LINK_OK;
} else [..]
[..]
}
static void
gst_avi_mux_loop (GstElement *element)
{
GstAviMux *mux = GST_AVI_MUX (element);
[..]
/* As we get here, we should have written the header if we hadn't done
* that before yet, and we're supposed to have an internal buffer from
* each pad, also from the audio one. So here, we check again whether
* this is the first run and if so, we set static caps. */
if (mux->first_cycle) {
const GList *padlist = gst_element_get_pad_list (element);
GList *item;
for (item = padlist; item != NULL; item = item->next) {
GstPad *pad = item->data;
GstCaps *caps;
if (!GST_PAD_IS_SINK (pad))
continue;
/* set static caps here */
if (!strncmp (gst_pad_get_name (pad), "audio_", 6)) {
/* the strf is the struct you filled in the _link () function. */
switch (strf->format) {
case 0x0055: /* mp3 */
caps = gst_caps_new_simple ("audio/mpeg",
"mpegversion", G_TYPE_INT, 1,
"layer", G_TYPE_INT, 3,
"bitrate", G_TYPE_INT, strf->av_bps,
"rate", G_TYPE_INT, strf->rate,
"channels", G_TYPE_INT, strf->channels,
NULL);
break;
case 0x0001: /* pcm */
caps = gst_caps_new_simple ("audio/x-raw-int",
[..]);
break;
[..]
}
} else if (!strncmp (gst_pad_get_name (pad), "video_", 6)) {
[..]
} else {
g_warning ("oi!");
continue;
}
/* set static caps */
gst_pad_use_explicit_caps (pad);
gst_pad_set_explicit_caps (pad, caps);
}
}
[..]
/* Next runs will never be the first again. */
mux->first_cycle = FALSE;
}
</programlisting>
<para>
Note that there are other ways to achieve that, which might be useful
for more complex cases. This will do for the simple cases, though.
This method is provided to simplify negotiation and renegotiation in
muxers, it is not a complete solution, nor is it a pretty one.
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="section-muxer-markup" xreflabel="Markup vs. data processing">
<title>Markup vs. data processing</title>
<para>
As we noted on demuxers before, we love common programming paradigms
such as clean, lean and mean code. To achieve that in muxers, it's
generally a good idea to separate the actual data stream markup from
the data processing. To illustrate, here's how AVI muxers should
write out RIFF tag chunks:
</para>
<programlisting>
static void
gst_avi_mux_write_chunk (GstAviMux *mux,
guint32 id,
GstBuffer *data)
{
GstBuffer *hdr;
hdr = gst_buffer_new_and_alloc (8);
((guint32 *) GST_BUFFER_DATA (buf))[0] = GUINT32_TO_LE (id);
((guint32 *) GST_BUFFER_DATA (buf))[1] = GUINT32_TO_LE (GST_BUFFER_SIZE (data));
gst_pad_push (mux->srcpad, hdr);
gst_pad_push (mux->srcpad, data);
}
static void
gst_avi_mux_loop (GstElement *element)
{
GstAviMux *mux = GST_AVI_MUX (element);
GstBuffer *buf;
[..]
buf = gst_pad_pull (mux->sinkpad[0]);
[..]
gst_avi_mux_write_chunk (GST_MAKE_FOURCC ('0','0','d','b'), buf);
}
</programlisting>
<para>
In general, try to program clean code, that should cover pretty
much everything.
</para>
</sect1>
</chapter>