mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer.git
synced 2024-12-19 14:56:36 +00:00
docs: avoid confusion between events and messages
This commit is contained in:
parent
32b1ea4769
commit
6e7ccbf9ab
1 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ for upstream elements. Indeed, given arrival time T1 as given in (1)
|
|||
we can be certain that buffers with a timestamp B2 < T1 will be too late
|
||||
in the sink.
|
||||
|
||||
In case of a positive jitter we can therefore send a QoS message with
|
||||
In case of a positive jitter we can therefore send a QoS event with
|
||||
a timestamp B1, jitter J1 and proportion given by (4).
|
||||
|
||||
This allows an upstream element to not generate any data with timestamps
|
||||
|
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ The element can even do a better estimation of the next valid timestamp it
|
|||
should output.
|
||||
|
||||
Indeed, given the element generated a buffer with timestamp B0 that arrived
|
||||
in time in the sink but then received a QoS message stating B1 arrived J1
|
||||
in time in the sink but then received a QoS event stating B1 arrived J1
|
||||
too late. This means generating B1 took (B1 + J1) - B0 = T1 - T0 = PT1, as
|
||||
given in (3). Given the buffer B1 had a duration D1 and assuming that
|
||||
generating a new buffer B2 will take the same amount of processing time,
|
||||
|
@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ This average is less susceptible to sudden changes that would only influence
|
|||
the datarate for a very short period.
|
||||
|
||||
A running average is calculated over the observations given in (4) and is
|
||||
used as the proportion member in the QoS message that is sent upstream.
|
||||
used as the proportion member in the QoS event that is sent upstream.
|
||||
|
||||
Receivers of the QoS message should permanently reduce their datarate
|
||||
Receivers of the QoS event should permanently reduce their datarate
|
||||
as given by the proportion member. Failure to do so will certainly lead to
|
||||
more dropped frames and a generally worse QoS.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ is used to decide flood or starvation.
|
|||
|
||||
The number of rendered and dropped buffers is used to query stats on the sink.
|
||||
|
||||
A QoS message with the most current values is sent upstream for each buffer
|
||||
A QoS event with the most current values is sent upstream for each buffer
|
||||
that was received by the sink.
|
||||
|
||||
Normally QoS is only enabled for video pipelines. The reason being that drops
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ GstBaseTransform
|
|||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
Transform elements can entirely skip the transform based on the timestamp and
|
||||
jitter values of recent QoS messages since these buffers will certainly arrive
|
||||
jitter values of recent QoS event since these buffers will certainly arrive
|
||||
too late.
|
||||
|
||||
With any intermediate element, the element should measure its performance to
|
||||
|
@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ some transforms can reduce the complexity of their algorithms. Depending on the
|
|||
algorithm, the changes in quality may have disturbing visual or audible effect
|
||||
that should be avoided.
|
||||
|
||||
A quality message should be posted when a frame is dropped or when the quality
|
||||
A QoS message should be posted when a frame is dropped or when the quality
|
||||
of the filter is reduced. The quality member in the QOS message should reflect
|
||||
the quality setting of the filter.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ frames. A typical codec can for example skip the decoding of B-frames to reduce
|
|||
the CPU usage and framerate.
|
||||
|
||||
If each frame is independantly decodable, any arbitrary frame can be skipped based
|
||||
on the timestamp and jitter values of the latest QoS message. In addition can the
|
||||
on the timestamp and jitter values of the latest QoS event. In addition can the
|
||||
proportion member be used to permanently skip frames.
|
||||
|
||||
It is suggested to adjust the quality field of the QoS message with the expected
|
||||
|
@ -364,22 +364,22 @@ Demuxers
|
|||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
Demuxers usually cannot do a lot regarding QoS except for skipping frames to the next
|
||||
keyframe when a lateness QoS message arrives on a source pad.
|
||||
keyframe when a lateness QoS event arrives on a source pad.
|
||||
|
||||
A demuxer can however measure if the performance problems are upstream or downstream
|
||||
and forward an updated QoS message upstream.
|
||||
and forward an updated QoS event upstream.
|
||||
|
||||
Most demuxers that have multiple output pads might need to combine the QoS messages on
|
||||
all the pads and derive an aggregated QoS message for the upstream element.
|
||||
Most demuxers that have multiple output pads might need to combine the QoS
|
||||
events on all the pads and derive an aggregated QoS event for the upstream element.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Sources
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
The QoS messages only apply to push based sources since pull based sources are entirely
|
||||
The QoS events only apply to push based sources since pull based sources are entirely
|
||||
controlled by another downstream element.
|
||||
|
||||
Sources can receive a flood or starvation message that can be used to switch to
|
||||
Sources can receive a flood or starvation event that can be used to switch to
|
||||
less demanding source material. In case of a network stream, a switch could be done
|
||||
to a lower or higher quality stream or additional enhancement layers could be used
|
||||
or ignored.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue