mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer.git
synced 2024-11-26 19:51:11 +00:00
gst/audiofx/: Add small comparision with the windowed sinc filters in the docs.
Original commit message from CVS: * gst/audiofx/audiochebyshevfreqband.c: * gst/audiofx/audiochebyshevfreqlimit.c: Add small comparision with the windowed sinc filters in the docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
aba981fd88
commit
5f32a4bac6
5 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||||
|
2007-08-19 Sebastian Dröge <slomo@circular-chaos.org>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* gst/audiofx/audiochebyshevfreqband.c:
|
||||||
|
* gst/audiofx/audiochebyshevfreqlimit.c:
|
||||||
|
Add small comparision with the windowed sinc filters in the docs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2007-08-19 Sebastian Dröge <slomo@circular-chaos.org>
|
2007-08-19 Sebastian Dröge <slomo@circular-chaos.org>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* tests/check/elements/audiochebyshevfreqband.c: (GST_START_TEST),
|
* tests/check/elements/audiochebyshevfreqband.c: (GST_START_TEST),
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
|
||||||
* band. The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
* band. The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
||||||
* </para>
|
* </para>
|
||||||
* <para>
|
* <para>
|
||||||
|
* This element has the advantage over the windowed sinc bandpass and bandreject filter that it is
|
||||||
|
* much faster and produces almost as good results. It's only disadvantages are the highly
|
||||||
|
* non-linear phase and the slower rolloff compared to a windowed sinc filter with a large kernel.
|
||||||
|
* </para>
|
||||||
|
* <para>
|
||||||
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
||||||
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
||||||
* a faster rolloff.
|
* a faster rolloff.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
|
||||||
* cutoff frequency (high-pass). The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
* cutoff frequency (high-pass). The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
||||||
* </para>
|
* </para>
|
||||||
* <para>
|
* <para>
|
||||||
|
* This element has the advantage over the windowed sinc lowpass and highpass filter that it is
|
||||||
|
* much faster and produces almost as good results. It's only disadvantages are the highly
|
||||||
|
* non-linear phase and the slower rolloff compared to a windowed sinc filter with a large kernel.
|
||||||
|
* </para>
|
||||||
|
* <para>
|
||||||
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
||||||
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
||||||
* a faster rolloff.
|
* a faster rolloff.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
|
||||||
* band. The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
* band. The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
||||||
* </para>
|
* </para>
|
||||||
* <para>
|
* <para>
|
||||||
|
* This element has the advantage over the windowed sinc bandpass and bandreject filter that it is
|
||||||
|
* much faster and produces almost as good results. It's only disadvantages are the highly
|
||||||
|
* non-linear phase and the slower rolloff compared to a windowed sinc filter with a large kernel.
|
||||||
|
* </para>
|
||||||
|
* <para>
|
||||||
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
||||||
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
||||||
* a faster rolloff.
|
* a faster rolloff.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
|
||||||
* cutoff frequency (high-pass). The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
* cutoff frequency (high-pass). The number of poles and the ripple parameter control the rolloff.
|
||||||
* </para>
|
* </para>
|
||||||
* <para>
|
* <para>
|
||||||
|
* This element has the advantage over the windowed sinc lowpass and highpass filter that it is
|
||||||
|
* much faster and produces almost as good results. It's only disadvantages are the highly
|
||||||
|
* non-linear phase and the slower rolloff compared to a windowed sinc filter with a large kernel.
|
||||||
|
* </para>
|
||||||
|
* <para>
|
||||||
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
* For type 1 the ripple parameter specifies how much ripple in dB is allowed in the passband, i.e.
|
||||||
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
* some frequencies in the passband will be amplified by that value. A higher ripple value will allow
|
||||||
* a faster rolloff.
|
* a faster rolloff.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue