mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer.git
synced 2024-11-25 11:11:08 +00:00
MAINTAINERS: Update with new email address.
Original commit message from CVS: * MAINTAINERS: Update with new email address. * docs/design/part-TODO.txt: Add some more info about future pad-block and negotiation changes. * docs/design/part-buffering.txt: Add some ideas about buffering reporting.
This commit is contained in:
parent
942b97b2cb
commit
2c86c99241
4 changed files with 53 additions and 3 deletions
11
ChangeLog
11
ChangeLog
|
@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
|
|||
2007-11-06 Wim Taymans <wim.taymans@gmail.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* MAINTAINERS:
|
||||
Update with new email address.
|
||||
|
||||
* docs/design/part-TODO.txt:
|
||||
Add some more info about future pad-block and negotiation changes.
|
||||
|
||||
* docs/design/part-buffering.txt:
|
||||
Add some ideas about buffering reporting.
|
||||
|
||||
2007-11-06 Jan Schmidt <jan.schmidt@sun.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* tests/check/gst/gstobject.c:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ GStreamer is currently maintained by the consensus of a number
|
|||
of people, including, but not limited to:
|
||||
|
||||
Jan Schmidt <thaytan@noraisin.net>
|
||||
Wim Taymans <wim@fluendo.com>
|
||||
Wim Taymans <wim.taymans@gmail.com>
|
||||
David Schleef <ds@schleef.org>
|
||||
Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@fluendo.com>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ API/ABI
|
|||
(gstvalue/gststructure)
|
||||
|
||||
- rethink how we handle dynamic replugging wrt segments and other events that
|
||||
already got pushed and need to be pushed again.
|
||||
already got pushed and need to be pushed again. Might need GstFlowReturn from
|
||||
gst_pad_push_event().
|
||||
|
||||
- keep track of seeks with a counter so that we can match seek events received
|
||||
in the demuxer srcpads. This is needed because a normal seek on a pipeline
|
||||
|
@ -37,6 +38,12 @@ API/ABI
|
|||
that resulted from the seek so that everything seek related can be tracked
|
||||
properly.
|
||||
|
||||
- Optimize negotiation. We currently do a get_caps() call when we link pads,
|
||||
which could potentially generate a huge list of caps and all their
|
||||
combinations, we need to avoid generating these huge lists by generating them
|
||||
incrementaly when needed. We can do this with a gst_pad_iterate_caps() call.
|
||||
We also need to incrementally return intersections etc, for this.
|
||||
|
||||
- When an element goes to PAUSED there is no way to figure out the running time
|
||||
when this happened. One could think that we can store this time in the
|
||||
base_time field of the element but that causes problems when the element is
|
||||
|
@ -58,6 +65,17 @@ API/ABI
|
|||
There needs to be a mechanism for a live source to request a new base_time or
|
||||
pipeline restart.
|
||||
|
||||
- pad block has several issues:
|
||||
* can't block on selected things, like push, pull, pad_alloc, events, ...
|
||||
* can't check why the block happened. We should also be able to get the item/
|
||||
reason that blocked the pad.
|
||||
* it only blocks on datapassing. When EOS, the block never happens but ideally
|
||||
should because pad block should inform the app when there is no dataflow.
|
||||
* blocking should only happen from one thread. If one thread does pad_alloc
|
||||
and another a push, the push might be busy while the block callback is done.
|
||||
* maybe this name is overloaded. We need to look at some more use cases before
|
||||
trying to fix this.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
IMPLEMENTATION
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
@ -66,7 +84,7 @@ IMPLEMENTATION
|
|||
|
||||
- implement BUFFERSIZE.
|
||||
|
||||
- implement pad_block with probes.
|
||||
- implement pad_block with probes? see above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DESIGN
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -52,6 +52,27 @@ with 100 percent value is received, which might only happen after the pipeline
|
|||
prerolled.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Buffering Query
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to query the amount of buffering performed in the pipeline, which
|
||||
is defined as the amount of data made available at the source. This amount is
|
||||
expressed in some GstFormat and is usually compared to the duration or position
|
||||
of the media stream in the same GstFormat.
|
||||
|
||||
The buffering query should return the following information:
|
||||
|
||||
- format
|
||||
- position
|
||||
- duration
|
||||
|
||||
The format is of lesser importance, the ratio of position versus duration can be
|
||||
used to calculate the percentage of available media. It should also be possible
|
||||
for the application to calculate the expected time when the complete file will
|
||||
be buffered.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Incremental download
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue