gstreamer/docs/manual/motivation.sgml

<chapter id="cha-motivation">
  <title>Motivation</title>
  <para> 
    Linux has historically lagged behind other operating systems in the multimedia 
    arena. Microsoft's Windows[tm] and Apple's MacOS[tm] both have strong support 
    for multimedia devices, multimedia content creation,
    playback, and realtime processing. Linux, on the other hand, has a poorly integrated 
    collection of multimedia utilities and applications available, which can hardly compete 
    with the professional level of software available for MS Windows and MacOS.
  </para>

  <sect1 id="sec-motivation-problems">
    <title>Current problems</title>
    <para> 
      We descibe the typical problems in todays media handling on Linux.
    </para>
    <sect2 id="sec-motivation-duplicate">
      <title>Multitude of duplicate code</title>
      <para> 
        The Linux user who wishes to hear a sound file must hunt through their collection of 
        sound file players in order to play the tens of sound file formats in wide use today. 
        Most of these players basically reimplement the same code over and over again.
      </para>
      <para>
        The Linux developer who wishes to embed a video clip in their application must use 
        crude hacks to run an external video player. There is no library available that a
        developer can use to create a custom media player.
      </para>

    </sect2>
    <sect2 id="sec-motivation-goal">
      <title>'One goal' media players</title>
      <para>
        Your typical MPEG player was designed to play MPEG video and audio. Most of
        these players have implemented a complete infrastructure focused on 
        achieving their only goal: playback. No provisions were made to add
        filters or special effects to the video or audio data.
      </para> 
      <para>
        If I wanted to convert an MPEG2 video stream into an AVI file, my best
        option would be to take all of the MPEG2 decoding algorithms out
        of the player and duplicate them into my own AVI encoder. These 
        algorithms cannot easily be shared accross applications.
      </para> 
    </sect2>
  
    <sect2 id="sec-motivation-plugin">
      <title>Non unified plugin mechanisms</title>
      <para> 
        Your typical media player might have a plugin for different media
        types. Two media players will typically implement their own plugin
        mechanism so that the codecs cannot be easily exchanged. 
      </para> 
      <para> 
        The lack of a unified plugin mechanism also seriously hinders the 
	creation of binary only codecs. No company is willing to port their
	code to all the different plugin mechanisms.
      </para> 
      <para> 
        While GStreamer also uses it own plugin system it offers a very rich
	framework for the plugin.
      </para> 
    </sect2>

    <sect2 id="sec-motivation-network">
      <title>Provision for network transparency</title>
      <para> 
        No infrastructure is present to allow network transparent media
        handling. A distributed MPEG encoder will typically duplicate the
        same encoder algorithms found in a non-distributed encoder.
      </para> 
      <para> 
        No provisions have been made for emerging technologies such as
	the GNOME object embedding using BONOBO.
      </para> 
    </sect2>

    <sect2 id="sec-motivation-catchup">
      <title>Catch up with the Windows(tm) world</title>
      <para> 
        We need solid media handling if we want to see Linux succeed on
	the desktop.
      </para> 
      <para> 
        We must clear the road for commercially backed codecs and multimedia 
	applications so that Linux can become an option for doing multimedia.
      </para> 
    </sect2>
  </sect1>
</chapter>