2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
Bufferpool
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
This document details the design of how buffers are be allocated and
|
|
|
|
managed in pools.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Bufferpools increases performance by reducing allocation overhead and
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
improving possibilities to implement zero-copy memory transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Together with the ALLOCATION query, elements can negotiate allocation properties
|
|
|
|
and bufferpools between themselves. This also allows elements to negotiate
|
|
|
|
buffer metadata between themselves.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
- Provide a GstBufferPool base class to help the efficient implementation of a
|
|
|
|
list of reusable GstBuffer objects.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
- Let upstream elements initiate the negotiation of a bufferpool and its
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
configuration. Allow downstream elements provide bufferpool properties and/or
|
|
|
|
a bufferpool. This includes the following properties:
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* have minimum and maximum amount of buffers with the option of
|
|
|
|
preallocating buffers.
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
* allocator, alignment and padding support
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* buffer metadata
|
|
|
|
* arbitrary extra options
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
- Integrate with dynamic caps renegotiation.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
- Notify upstream element of new bufferpool availability. This is important
|
|
|
|
when a new element, that can provide a bufferpool, is dynamically linked
|
|
|
|
downstream.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GstBufferPool
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bufferpool object manages a list of buffers with the same properties such
|
|
|
|
as size, padding and alignment.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
The bufferpool has two states: active and inactive. In the in-active
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
state, the bufferpool can be configured with the required allocation
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
preferences. In the active state, buffers can be retrieved from and
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
returned to the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default implementation of the bufferpool is able to allocate buffers
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
from any allocator with arbitrary alignment and padding/prefix.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom implementations of the bufferpool can override the allocation and
|
|
|
|
free algorithms of the buffers from the pool. This should allow for
|
|
|
|
different allocation strategies such as using shared memory or hardware
|
|
|
|
mapped memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Negotiation
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
After a particular media format has been negotiated between two pads (using the
|
|
|
|
CAPS event), they must agree on how to allocate buffers.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
The srcpad will always take the initiative to negotiate the allocation
|
|
|
|
properties. It starts with creating a GST_QUERY_ALLOCATION with the negotiated
|
|
|
|
caps.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
The srcpad can set the need-pool flag to TRUE in the query to optionally make the
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
peer pad allocate a bufferpool. It should only do this if it is able to use
|
|
|
|
the peer provided bufferpool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
It will then inspect the returned results and configure the returned pool or
|
|
|
|
create a new pool with the returned properties when needed.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Buffers are then allocated by the srcpad from the negotiated pool and pushed to
|
|
|
|
the peer pad as usual.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-21 15:47:36 +00:00
|
|
|
The allocation query can also return an allocator name when the buffers are of
|
|
|
|
different sizes and can't be allocated from a pool.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Allocation query
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
The allocation query has the following fields:
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
(in) "caps", GST_TYPE_CAPS
|
|
|
|
- the caps that was negotiated
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
(in) "need-pool", G_TYPE_BOOLEAN
|
|
|
|
- if a GstBufferPool is requested
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
(out) "pool", G_TYPE_ARRAY of structure
|
|
|
|
- an array of pool configurations.
|
2011-06-21 15:47:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
GstBufferPool *pool;
|
|
|
|
guint size;
|
|
|
|
guint min_buffers;
|
|
|
|
guint max_buffers;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-06-21 15:47:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
use gst_query_parse_nth_allocation_pool() to get the values.
|
2011-06-21 15:47:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
The allocator can contain multiple pool configurations. If need-pool
|
|
|
|
was TRUE, the pool member might contain a GstBufferPool when the
|
|
|
|
downstream element can provide one.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
Size contains the size of the bufferpool buffers and is never 0.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
min_buffers and max_buffers contain the suggested min and max amount of
|
|
|
|
buffers that should be managed by the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upstream element can choose to use the provided pool or make its own
|
|
|
|
pool when none was provided or when the suggested pool was not
|
|
|
|
acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pool can then be configured with the suggested min and max amount of
|
|
|
|
buffers or a downstream element might choose different values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(out) "allocator", G_TYPE_ARRAY of structure
|
|
|
|
- an array of allocator parameters that can be used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
GstAllocator *allocator;
|
|
|
|
GstAllocationParams params;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use gst_query_parse_nth_allocation_param() to get the values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The element performing the query can use the allocators and its
|
|
|
|
parameters to allocate memory for the downstream element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to configure the allocator in a provided pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-09 14:03:11 +00:00
|
|
|
(out) "metadata", G_TYPE_ARRAY of GType
|
|
|
|
- an array of metadata API types that can be accepted.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
These metadata items can be accepted by the downstream element when
|
|
|
|
placed on buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some bufferpools have options to enable metadata on the buffers
|
|
|
|
allocated by the pool.
|
2011-06-21 15:47:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocating from pool
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffers are allocated from the pool of a pad:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res = gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer (pool, &buffer, ¶ms);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
A GstBuffer that is allocated from the pool will always be writable (have a
|
|
|
|
refcount of 1) and it will also have its pool member point to the GstBufferPool
|
|
|
|
that created the buffer.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Buffers are refcounted in the usual way. When the refcount of the buffer
|
|
|
|
reaches 0, the buffer is automatically returned to the pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since all the buffers allocated from the pool keep a reference to the pool,
|
|
|
|
when nothing else is holding a refcount to the pool, it will be finalized
|
|
|
|
when all the buffers from the pool are unreffed. By setting the pool to
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
the inactive state we can drain all buffers from the pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
When the pool is in the inactive state, gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer() will
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
return GST_FLOW_FLUSHING immediately.
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extra parameters can be given to the gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer() method to
|
|
|
|
influence the allocation decision. GST_BUFFER_POOL_FLAG_KEY_UNIT and
|
|
|
|
GST_BUFFER_POOL_FLAG_DISCONT serve as hints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the bufferpool is configured with a maximum number of buffers, allocation
|
|
|
|
will block when all buffers are outstanding until a buffer is returned to the
|
|
|
|
pool. This behaviour can be changed by specifying the
|
|
|
|
GST_BUFFER_POOL_FLAG_DONTWAIT flag in the parameters. With this flag set,
|
2012-01-14 18:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
allocation will return GST_FLOW_EOS when the pool is empty.
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiation
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiation of the bufferpool might need to be performed when the
|
|
|
|
configuration of the pool changes. Changes can be in the buffer size (because
|
|
|
|
of a caps change), alignment or number of buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* downstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the upstream element wants to negotiate a new format, it might need
|
|
|
|
to renegotiate a new bufferpool configuration with the downstream element.
|
|
|
|
This can, for example, happen when the buffer size changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can not just reconfigure the existing bufferpool because there might
|
|
|
|
still be outstanding buffers from the pool in the pipeline. Therefore we
|
|
|
|
need to create a new bufferpool for the new configuration while we let the
|
|
|
|
old pool drain.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-10 13:46:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Implementations can choose to reuse the same bufferpool object and wait for
|
|
|
|
the drain to finish before reconfiguring the pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The element that wants to renegotiate a new bufferpool uses exactly the same
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
algorithm as when it first started. It will negotiate caps first then use the
|
|
|
|
ALLOCATION query to get and configure the new pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* upstream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a downstream element wants to negotiate a new format, it will send a
|
|
|
|
RECONFIGURE event upstream. This instructs upstream to renegotiate both
|
|
|
|
the format and the bufferpool when needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A pipeline reconfiguration is when new elements are added or removed from
|
|
|
|
the pipeline or when the topology of the pipeline changes. Pipeline
|
|
|
|
reconfiguration also triggers possible renegotiation of the bufferpool and
|
|
|
|
caps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A RECONFIGURE event tags each pad it travels on as needing reconfiguration.
|
2011-02-10 13:46:08 +00:00
|
|
|
The next buffer allocation will then require the renegotiation or
|
|
|
|
reconfiguration of a pool.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutting down
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In push mode, a source pad is responsible for setting the pool to the
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
inactive state when streaming stops. The inactive state will unblock any pending
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
allocations so that the element can shut down.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
In pull mode, the sink element should set the pool to the inactive state when
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
shutting down so that the peer _get_range() function can unblock.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
In the inactive state, all the buffers that are returned to the pool will
|
|
|
|
automatically be freed by the pool and new allocations will fail.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use cases
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) videotestsrc ! xvimagesink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before videotestsrc can output a buffer, it needs to negotiate caps and
|
|
|
|
a bufferpool with the downstream peer pad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First it will negotiate a suitable format with downstream according to the
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
normal rules. It will send a CAPS event downstream with the negotiated
|
|
|
|
configuration.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Then it does an ALLOCATION query. It will use the returned bufferpool or
|
|
|
|
configures its own bufferpool with the returned parameters. The bufferpool is
|
|
|
|
initially in the inactive state.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
The ALLOCATION query lists the desired configuration of the downstream
|
|
|
|
xvimagesink, which can have specific alignment and/or min/max amount of
|
|
|
|
buffers.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
videotestsrc updates the configuration of the bufferpool, it will likely
|
|
|
|
set the min buffers to 1 and the size of the desired buffers. It then
|
|
|
|
updates the bufferpool configuration with the new properties.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
When the configuration is successfully updated, videotestsrc sets the
|
|
|
|
bufferpool to the active state. This preallocates the buffers in the pool
|
|
|
|
(if needed). This operation can fail when there is not enough memory
|
|
|
|
available. Since the bufferpool is provided by xvimagesink, it will allocate
|
|
|
|
buffers backed by an XvImage and pointing to shared memory with the X server.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the bufferpool is successfully activated, videotestsrc can acquire a
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
buffer from the pool, fill in the data and push it out to xvimagesink.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xvimagesink can know that the buffer originated from its pool by following
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
the pool member.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
when shutting down, videotestsrc will set the pool to the inactive state,
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
this will cause further allocations to fail and currently allocated buffers
|
|
|
|
to be freed. videotestsrc will then free the pool and stop streaming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) videotestsrc ! queue ! myvideosink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this second use case we have a videosink that can at most allocate
|
|
|
|
3 video buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again videotestsrc will have to negotiate a bufferpool with the peer
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
element. For this it will perform the ALLOCATION query which
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
queue will proxy to its downstream peer element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bufferpool returned from myvideosink will have a max_buffers set to 3.
|
|
|
|
queue and videotestsrc can operate with this upper limit because none of
|
|
|
|
those elements require more than that amount of buffers for temporary
|
|
|
|
storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bufferpool of myvideosink will then be configured with the size of the
|
|
|
|
buffers for the negotiated format and according to the padding and alignment
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
rules. When videotestsrc sets the pool to active, the 3 video
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
buffers will be preallocated in the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
videotestsrc acquires a buffer from the configured pool on its srcpad and
|
|
|
|
pushes this into the queue. When the videotestsrc has acquired and pushed
|
|
|
|
3 frames, the next call to gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer() will block
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
(assuming the GST_BUFFER_POOL_FLAG_DONTWAIT is not specified).
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-02-10 13:46:08 +00:00
|
|
|
When the queue has pushed out a buffer and the sink has rendered it, the
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
refcount of the buffer reaches 0 and the buffer is recycled in the pool.
|
|
|
|
This will wake up the videotestsrc that was blocked, waiting for more
|
|
|
|
buffers and will make it produce the next buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this setup, there are at most 3 buffers active in the pipeline and
|
|
|
|
the videotestsrc is rate limited by the rate at which buffers are recycled
|
|
|
|
in the bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When shutting down, videotestsrc will first set the bufferpool on the srcpad
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
to inactive. This causes any pending (blocked) acquire to return with a
|
2012-05-10 10:15:49 +00:00
|
|
|
FLUSHING result and causes the streaming thread to pause.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) .. ! myvideodecoder ! queue ! fakesink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, the myvideodecoder requires buffers to be aligned to 128
|
|
|
|
bytes and padded with 4096 bytes. The pipeline starts out with the
|
|
|
|
decoder linked to a fakesink but we will then dynamically change the
|
|
|
|
sink to one that can provide a bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When it negotiates the size with the downstream element fakesink, it will
|
|
|
|
receive a NULL bufferpool because fakesink does not provide a bufferpool.
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
It will then select its own custom bufferpool to start the datatransfer.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At some point we block the queue srcpad, unlink the queue from the
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
fakesink, link a new sink and set the new sink to the PLAYING state.
|
|
|
|
Linking the new sink would automatically send a RECONFIGURE event upstream
|
|
|
|
and, through queue, inform myvideodecoder that it should renegotiate its
|
|
|
|
bufferpool because downstream has been reconfigured.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before pushing the next buffer, myvideodecoder would renegotiate a new
|
|
|
|
bufferpool. To do this, it performs the usual bufferpool negotiation
|
|
|
|
algorithm. If it can obtain and configure a new bufferpool from downstream,
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
it sets its own (old) pool to inactive and unrefs it. This will eventually
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
drain and unref the old bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new bufferpool is set as the new bufferpool for the srcpad and sinkpad
|
2011-03-04 15:05:44 +00:00
|
|
|
of the queue and set to the active state.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) .. ! myvideodecoder ! queue ! myvideosink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
myvideodecoder has negotiated a bufferpool with the downstream myvideosink
|
|
|
|
to handle buffers of size 320x240. It has now detected a change in the
|
|
|
|
video format and need to renegotiate to a resolution of 640x480. This
|
|
|
|
requires it to negotiate a new bufferpool with a larger buffersize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When myvideodecoder needs to get the bigger buffer, it starts the
|
|
|
|
negotiation of a new bufferpool. It queries a bufferpool from downstream,
|
|
|
|
reconfigures it with the new configuration (which includes the bigger buffer
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
size) and it then sets the bufferpool to active. The old pool is inactivated
|
|
|
|
and unreffed, which causes the old format to drain.
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It then uses the new bufferpool for allocating new buffers of the new
|
|
|
|
dimension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If at some point, the decoder wants to switch to a lower resolution again,
|
|
|
|
it can choose to use the current pool (which has buffers that are larger
|
|
|
|
than the required size) or it can choose to renegotiate a new bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) .. ! myvideodecoder ! videoscale ! myvideosink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
myvideosink is providing a bufferpool for upstream elements and wants to
|
|
|
|
change the resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-03 10:43:32 +00:00
|
|
|
myvideosink sends a RECONFIGURE event upstream to notify upstream that a
|
2011-02-09 15:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
new format is desirable. upstream elements try to negotiate a new format
|
|
|
|
and bufferpool before pushing out a new buffer. The old bufferpools are
|
|
|
|
drained in the regular way.
|
|
|
|
|