2005-06-23 10:37:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Live sources
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A live source such as an element capturing audio or video need to be handled
|
|
|
|
in a special way. It does not make sense to start the dataflow in the PAUSED
|
|
|
|
state for those devices as the user might wait a long time between going from
|
|
|
|
PAUSED to PLAYING, making the previously captured buffers irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A live source therefore only produces buffers in the PLAYING state. This has
|
|
|
|
implications for sinks waiting for a buffer to complete the preroll state
|
|
|
|
since such a buffer might never arrive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live sources return NO_PREROLL when going to the PAUSED state to inform the
|
|
|
|
bin/pipeline that this element will not be able to produce data in the
|
|
|
|
PAUSED state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When performing a get_state() on a bin with a non-zero timeout value, the
|
|
|
|
bin must be sure that there are no live sources in the pipeline because else
|
|
|
|
the get_state() function would block on the sinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A gstbin therefore always performs a zero timeout get_state() on its
|
|
|
|
elements to discover the NO_PREROLL (and ERROR) elements before performing
|
2005-10-08 16:49:15 +00:00
|
|
|
a blocking wait.
|
2005-06-23 10:37:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduling
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live sources can not produce data in the paused state. They block in the
|
|
|
|
getrange function or in the loop function until they go to PLAYING.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latency
|
|
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The live source timestamps its data with the time of the clock at the
|
|
|
|
time the data was captured. Normally it will take some time to capture
|
|
|
|
the first sample of data and the last sample. This means that when the
|
|
|
|
buffer arrives at the sink, it will already be late and will be dropped.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-16 13:53:55 +00:00
|
|
|
The latency is the time it takes to construct one buffer of data. This latency
|
|
|
|
could be exposed by latency queries.
|
2005-06-23 10:37:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-18 13:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
Theses latency queries could to be done by the managing pipeline for all sinks.
|
|
|
|
In that case they can only be done after the meassurements have been taken (all
|
|
|
|
are prerolled). Thus in pipeline:state_changed:PAUSED_TO_PLAYING we need
|
|
|
|
get the max-latency and set this as a sync-offset in all sinks. The problem is
|
|
|
|
that in a live pipeline, we set the pipeline to PLAYING before waiting for the
|
|
|
|
sinks to preroll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another possibility would be to configure a fixed latency in a pipeline that
|
|
|
|
would automatically be configured on any sink in the case of a NO_PREROLL
|
|
|
|
element. For decoupled elements this is practically the only viable way to
|
|
|
|
introduce enough latency that does not starve the sinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current latency can also be measured in the sinks and the pipeline could
|
|
|
|
optimize it to the lowest possible latency.
|