2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
# Bufferpool
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
This document details the design of how buffers are allocated and
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
managed in pools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bufferpools increase performance by reducing allocation overhead and
|
|
|
|
improving possibilities to implement zero-copy memory transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Together with the ALLOCATION query, elements can negotiate allocation
|
|
|
|
properties and bufferpools between themselves. This also allows elements
|
|
|
|
to negotiate buffer metadata between themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
- Provide a `GstBufferPool` base class to help the efficient
|
|
|
|
implementation of a list of reusable `GstBuffer` objects.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Let upstream elements initiate the negotiation of a bufferpool and
|
|
|
|
its configuration. Allow downstream elements provide bufferpool
|
|
|
|
properties and/or a bufferpool. This includes the following
|
|
|
|
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- have minimum and maximum amount of buffers with the option of
|
|
|
|
preallocating buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- allocator, alignment and padding support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- buffer metadata
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- arbitrary extra options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Integrate with dynamic caps renegotiation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Notify upstream element of new bufferpool availability. This is
|
|
|
|
important when a new element, that can provide a bufferpool, is
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
dynamically linked downstream.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## GstBufferPool
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bufferpool object manages a list of buffers with the same properties such
|
|
|
|
as size, padding and alignment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bufferpool has two states: active and inactive. In the inactive
|
|
|
|
state, the bufferpool can be configured with the required allocation
|
|
|
|
preferences. In the active state, buffers can be retrieved from and
|
|
|
|
returned to the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default implementation of the bufferpool is able to allocate buffers
|
|
|
|
from any allocator with arbitrary alignment and padding/prefix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom implementations of the bufferpool can override the allocation and
|
|
|
|
free algorithms of the buffers from the pool. This should allow for
|
|
|
|
different allocation strategies such as using shared memory or hardware
|
|
|
|
mapped memory.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Negotiation
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a particular media format has been negotiated between two pads (using the
|
|
|
|
CAPS event), they must agree on how to allocate buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The srcpad will always take the initiative to negotiate the allocation
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
properties. It starts with creating a `GST_QUERY_ALLOCATION` with the negotiated
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
caps.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
The srcpad can set the need-pool flag to TRUE in the query to optionally make
|
|
|
|
the peer pad allocate a bufferpool. It should only do this if it is able to use
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
the peer provided bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It will then inspect the returned results and configure the returned pool or
|
|
|
|
create a new pool with the returned properties when needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffers are then allocated by the srcpad from the negotiated pool and pushed to
|
|
|
|
the peer pad as usual.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
The allocation query can also return an allocator object when the buffers are
|
|
|
|
of different sizes and can't be allocated from a pool.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Allocation query
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation query has the following fields:
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* (in) **`caps`**, `GST_TYPE_CAPS`: the caps that was negotiated
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* (in) **`need-pool`**, `G_TYPE_BOOLEAN`: if a `GstBufferPool` is requested
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* (out) **`pool`**, `G_TYPE_ARRAY` of structure: an array of pool configurations:
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
``` c
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
GstBufferPool *pool;
|
|
|
|
guint size;
|
|
|
|
guint min_buffers;
|
|
|
|
guint max_buffers;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
```
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use `gst_query_parse_nth_allocation_pool()` to get the values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocator can contain multiple pool configurations. If need-pool
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
was TRUE, the pool member might contain a `GstBufferPool` when the
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
downstream element can provide one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size contains the size of the bufferpool's buffers and is never 0.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
`min_buffers` and `max_buffers` contain the suggested min and max amount of
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
buffers that should be managed by the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upstream element can choose to use the provided pool or make its own
|
|
|
|
pool when none was provided or when the suggested pool was not
|
|
|
|
acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pool can then be configured with the suggested min and max amount of
|
|
|
|
buffers or a downstream element might choose different values.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
* (out) **`allocator`**, `G_TYPE_ARRAY` of structure: an array of allocator
|
|
|
|
parameters that can be used.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` c
|
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
GstAllocator *allocator;
|
|
|
|
GstAllocationParams params;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use `gst_query_parse_nth_allocation_param()` to get the values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The element performing the query can use the allocators and its
|
|
|
|
parameters to allocate memory for the downstream element.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to configure the allocator in a provided pool.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
* (out) **`metadata`**, `G_TYPE_ARRAY` of structure: an array of metadata
|
|
|
|
params that can be accepted.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` c
|
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
GType api;
|
|
|
|
GstStructure *params;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
Use `gst_query_parse_nth_allocation_meta()` to get the values.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These metadata items can be accepted by the downstream element when
|
|
|
|
placed on buffers. There is also an arbitrary `GstStructure` associated
|
|
|
|
with the metadata that contains metadata-specific options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some bufferpools have options to enable metadata on the buffers
|
|
|
|
allocated by the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Allocating from pool
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffers are allocated from the pool of a pad:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` c
|
|
|
|
res = gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer (pool, &buffer, ¶ms);
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A `GstBuffer` that is allocated from the pool will always be writable (have a
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
refcount of 1) and it will also have its pool member point to the
|
|
|
|
`GstBufferPool` that created the buffer.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffers are refcounted in the usual way. When the refcount of the buffer
|
|
|
|
reaches 0, the buffer is automatically returned to the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since all the buffers allocated from the pool keep a reference to the pool,
|
|
|
|
when nothing else is holding a refcount to the pool, it will be finalized
|
|
|
|
when all the buffers from the pool are unreffed. By setting the pool to
|
|
|
|
the inactive state we can drain all buffers from the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the pool is in the inactive state, `gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer()` will
|
|
|
|
return `GST_FLOW_FLUSHING` immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
Extra parameters can be given to the `gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer()` method
|
|
|
|
to influence the allocation decision. `GST_BUFFER_POOL_ACQUIRE_FLAG_KEY_UNIT`
|
|
|
|
and `GST_BUFFER_POOL_ACQUIRE_FLAG_DISCONT` serve as hints.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the bufferpool is configured with a maximum number of buffers, allocation
|
|
|
|
will block when all buffers are outstanding until a buffer is returned to the
|
|
|
|
pool. This behaviour can be changed by specifying the
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
`GST_BUFFER_POOL_ACQUIRE_FLAG_DONTWAIT` flag in the parameters. With this flag
|
|
|
|
set, allocation will return `GST_FLOW_EOS` when the pool is empty.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Renegotiation
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renegotiation of the bufferpool might need to be performed when the
|
|
|
|
configuration of the pool changes. Changes can be in the buffer size
|
2017-01-24 22:31:52 +00:00
|
|
|
(because of a caps change), alignment or number of buffers.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
### Downstream
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the upstream element wants to negotiate a new format, it might need
|
|
|
|
to renegotiate a new bufferpool configuration with the downstream element.
|
|
|
|
This can, for example, happen when the buffer size changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can not just reconfigure the existing bufferpool because there might
|
|
|
|
still be outstanding buffers from the pool in the pipeline. Therefore we
|
|
|
|
need to create a new bufferpool for the new configuration while we let the
|
|
|
|
old pool drain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementations can choose to reuse the same bufferpool object and wait for
|
|
|
|
the drain to finish before reconfiguring the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The element that wants to renegotiate a new bufferpool uses exactly the same
|
|
|
|
algorithm as when it first started. It will negotiate caps first then use the
|
|
|
|
ALLOCATION query to get and configure the new pool.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### Upstream
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a downstream element wants to negotiate a new format, it will send a
|
|
|
|
RECONFIGURE event upstream. This instructs upstream to renegotiate both
|
|
|
|
the format and the bufferpool when needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A pipeline reconfiguration happens when new elements are added or removed from
|
|
|
|
the pipeline or when the topology of the pipeline changes. Pipeline
|
|
|
|
reconfiguration also triggers possible renegotiation of the bufferpool and
|
|
|
|
caps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A RECONFIGURE event tags each pad it travels on as needing reconfiguration.
|
|
|
|
The next buffer allocation will then require the renegotiation or
|
|
|
|
reconfiguration of a pool.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Shutting down
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In push mode, a source pad is responsible for setting the pool to the
|
|
|
|
inactive state when streaming stops. The inactive state will unblock any pending
|
|
|
|
allocations so that the element can shut down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In pull mode, the sink element should set the pool to the inactive state when
|
|
|
|
shutting down so that the peer `_get_range()` function can unblock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the inactive state, all the buffers that are returned to the pool will
|
|
|
|
automatically be freed by the pool and new allocations will fail.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-21 05:54:04 +00:00
|
|
|
## Use cases
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### `videotestsrc ! xvimagesink`
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Before videotestsrc can output a buffer, it needs to negotiate caps and
|
|
|
|
a bufferpool with the downstream peer pad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* First it will negotiate a suitable format with downstream according to the
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
normal rules. It will send a `CAPS` event downstream with the negotiated
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* Then it does an `ALLOCATION` query. It will use the returned bufferpool or
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
configures its own bufferpool with the returned parameters. The bufferpool is
|
|
|
|
initially in the inactive state.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* The `ALLOCATION` query lists the desired configuration of the downstream
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
xvimagesink, which can have specific alignment and/or min/max amount of
|
|
|
|
buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* videotestsrc updates the configuration of the bufferpool, it will likely set
|
|
|
|
the min buffers to 1 and the size of the desired buffers. It then updates the
|
|
|
|
bufferpool configuration with the new properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When the configuration is successfully updated, videotestsrc sets the
|
|
|
|
bufferpool to the active state. This preallocates the buffers in the pool (if
|
|
|
|
needed). This operation can fail when there is not enough memory available.
|
|
|
|
Since the bufferpool is provided by xvimagesink, it will allocate buffers
|
|
|
|
backed by an XvImage and pointing to shared memory with the X server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If the bufferpool is successfully activated, videotestsrc can acquire
|
|
|
|
a buffer from the pool, fill in the data and push it out to xvimagesink.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* xvimagesink can know that the buffer originated from its pool by following
|
|
|
|
the pool member.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* when shutting down, videotestsrc will set the pool to the inactive state,
|
|
|
|
this will cause further allocations to fail and currently allocated buffers to
|
|
|
|
be freed. videotestsrc will then free the pool and stop streaming.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### `videotestsrc ! queue ! myvideosink`
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In this second use case we have a videosink that can at most allocate 3 video
|
|
|
|
buffers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Again videotestsrc will have to negotiate a bufferpool with the peer element.
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
For this it will perform the `ALLOCATION` query which queue will proxy to its
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
downstream peer element.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* The bufferpool returned from myvideosink will have a `max_buffers` set to 3.
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
queue and videotestsrc can operate with this upper limit because none of those
|
|
|
|
elements require more than that amount of buffers for temporary storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Myvideosink's bufferpool will then be configured with the size of the buffers
|
|
|
|
for the negotiated format and according to the padding and alignment rules.
|
|
|
|
When videotestsrc sets the pool to active, the 3 video buffers will be
|
|
|
|
preallocated in the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* videotestsrc acquires a buffer from the configured pool on its srcpad and
|
|
|
|
pushes this into the queue. When videotestsrc has acquired and pushed 3 frames,
|
2016-12-21 06:03:22 +00:00
|
|
|
the next call to `gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer()` will block (assuming the
|
2016-12-21 06:12:29 +00:00
|
|
|
`GST_BUFFER_POOL_ACQUIRE_FLAG_DONTWAIT` is not specified).
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When the queue has pushed out a buffer and the sink has rendered it, the
|
|
|
|
refcount of the buffer reaches 0 and the buffer is recycled in the pool. This
|
|
|
|
will wake up the videotestsrc that was blocked, waiting for more buffers and
|
|
|
|
will make it produce the next buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In this setup, there are at most 3 buffers active in the pipeline and the
|
|
|
|
videotestsrc is rate limited by the rate at which buffers are recycled in the
|
|
|
|
bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When shutting down, videotestsrc will first set the bufferpool on the srcpad
|
|
|
|
to inactive. This causes any pending (blocked) acquire to return with
|
|
|
|
a FLUSHING result and causes the streaming thread to pause.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### `.. ! myvideodecoder ! queue ! fakesink`
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In this case, the myvideodecoder requires buffers to be aligned to 128 bytes
|
|
|
|
and padded with 4096 bytes. The pipeline starts out with the decoder linked to
|
|
|
|
a fakesink but we will then dynamically change the sink to one that can provide
|
|
|
|
a bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When myvideodecoder negotiates the size with the downstream fakesink element,
|
|
|
|
it will receive a NULL bufferpool because fakesink does not provide
|
|
|
|
a bufferpool. It will then select its own custom bufferpool to start the data
|
|
|
|
transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* At some point we block the queue srcpad, unlink the queue from the fakesink,
|
|
|
|
link a new sink and set the new sink to the PLAYING state. Linking the new sink
|
|
|
|
would automatically send a RECONFIGURE event upstream and, through queue,
|
|
|
|
inform myvideodecoder that it should renegotiate its bufferpool because
|
|
|
|
downstream has been reconfigured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Before pushing the next buffer, myvideodecoder has to renegotiate a new
|
|
|
|
bufferpool. To do this, it performs the usual bufferpool negotiation algorithm.
|
|
|
|
If it can obtain and configure a new bufferpool from downstream, it sets its
|
|
|
|
own (old) pool to inactive and unrefs it. This will eventually drain and unref
|
|
|
|
the old bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The new bufferpool is set as the new bufferpool for the srcpad and sinkpad of
|
|
|
|
the queue and set to the active state.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### `.. ! myvideodecoder ! queue ! myvideosink`
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* myvideodecoder has negotiated a bufferpool with the downstream myvideosink to
|
|
|
|
handle buffers of size 320x240. It has now detected a change in the video
|
|
|
|
format and needs to renegotiate to a resolution of 640x480. This requires it to
|
|
|
|
negotiate a new bufferpool with a larger buffer size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When myvideodecoder needs to get the bigger buffer, it starts the negotiation
|
|
|
|
of a new bufferpool. It queries a bufferpool from downstream, reconfigures it
|
|
|
|
with the new configuration (which includes the bigger buffer size) and sets the
|
|
|
|
bufferpool to active. The old pool is inactivated and unreffed, which causes
|
|
|
|
the old format to drain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It then uses the new bufferpool for allocating new buffers of the new
|
|
|
|
dimension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If at some point, the decoder wants to switch to a lower resolution again, it
|
|
|
|
can choose to use the current pool (which has buffers that are larger than the
|
|
|
|
required size) or it can choose to renegotiate a new bufferpool.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
### `.. ! myvideodecoder ! videoscale ! myvideosink`
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* myvideosink is providing a bufferpool for upstream elements and wants to
|
|
|
|
change the resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-24 21:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* myvideosink sends a `RECONFIGURE` event upstream to notify upstream that a new
|
2016-12-05 21:12:24 +00:00
|
|
|
format is desirable. Upstream elements try to negotiate a new format and
|
|
|
|
bufferpool before pushing out a new buffer. The old bufferpools are drained in
|
|
|
|
the regular way.
|