mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-10-31 22:38:58 +00:00
3ba127c618
Fix #29997 --- Conflict resolution: - Use Forgejo's user blocking feature (services/issue/issue.go) - Trivial (tests/integration/pull_review_test.go) Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2872 (cherry picked from commit 475b6e839caa88994318f905f0965c3b418f876a)
386 lines
15 KiB
Go
386 lines
15 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package integration
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
"net/url"
|
|
"strconv"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
|
|
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
|
|
repo_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository"
|
|
files_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository/files"
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/PuerkitoBio/goquery"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestPullView_ReviewerMissed(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/pulls")
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3")
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func loadComment(t *testing.T, commentID string) *issues_model.Comment {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
id, err := strconv.ParseInt(commentID, 10, 64)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
return unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{ID: id})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestPullView_ResolveInvalidatedReviewComment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files")
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("single outdated review (line 1)", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/new_comment")
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
doc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/comments", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"origin": doc.GetInputValueByName("origin"),
|
|
"latest_commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"side": "proposed",
|
|
"line": "1",
|
|
"path": "iso-8859-1.txt",
|
|
"diff_start_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_start_cid"),
|
|
"diff_end_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_end_cid"),
|
|
"diff_base_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_base_cid"),
|
|
"content": "nitpicking comment",
|
|
"pending_review": "",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/submit", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"content": "looks good",
|
|
"type": "comment",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
// retrieve comment_id by reloading the comment page
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3")
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
doc = NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
commentID, ok := doc.Find(`[data-action="Resolve"]`).Attr("data-comment-id")
|
|
assert.True(t, ok)
|
|
|
|
// adjust the database to mark the comment as invalidated
|
|
// (to invalidate it properly, one should push a commit which should trigger this logic,
|
|
// in the meantime, use this quick-and-dirty trick)
|
|
comment := loadComment(t, commentID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, issues_model.UpdateCommentInvalidate(context.Background(), &issues_model.Comment{
|
|
ID: comment.ID,
|
|
Invalidated: true,
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/issues/resolve_conversation", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"origin": "timeline",
|
|
"action": "Resolve",
|
|
"comment_id": commentID,
|
|
})
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
// even on template error, the page returns HTTP 200
|
|
// count the comments to ensure success.
|
|
doc = NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
assert.Len(t, doc.Find(`.comments > .comment`).Nodes, 1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("outdated and newer review (line 2)", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/new_comment")
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
doc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
var firstReviewID int64
|
|
{
|
|
// first (outdated) review
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/comments", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"origin": doc.GetInputValueByName("origin"),
|
|
"latest_commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"side": "proposed",
|
|
"line": "2",
|
|
"path": "iso-8859-1.txt",
|
|
"diff_start_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_start_cid"),
|
|
"diff_end_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_end_cid"),
|
|
"diff_base_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_base_cid"),
|
|
"content": "nitpicking comment",
|
|
"pending_review": "",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/submit", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"content": "looks good",
|
|
"type": "comment",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
// retrieve comment_id by reloading the comment page
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3")
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
doc = NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
commentID, ok := doc.Find(`[data-action="Resolve"]`).Attr("data-comment-id")
|
|
assert.True(t, ok)
|
|
|
|
// adjust the database to mark the comment as invalidated
|
|
// (to invalidate it properly, one should push a commit which should trigger this logic,
|
|
// in the meantime, use this quick-and-dirty trick)
|
|
comment := loadComment(t, commentID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, issues_model.UpdateCommentInvalidate(context.Background(), &issues_model.Comment{
|
|
ID: comment.ID,
|
|
Invalidated: true,
|
|
}))
|
|
firstReviewID = comment.ReviewID
|
|
assert.NotZero(t, firstReviewID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ID of the first comment for the second (up-to-date) review
|
|
var commentID string
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
// second (up-to-date) review on the same line
|
|
// make a second review
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/comments", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"origin": doc.GetInputValueByName("origin"),
|
|
"latest_commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"side": "proposed",
|
|
"line": "2",
|
|
"path": "iso-8859-1.txt",
|
|
"diff_start_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_start_cid"),
|
|
"diff_end_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_end_cid"),
|
|
"diff_base_cid": doc.GetInputValueByName("diff_base_cid"),
|
|
"content": "nitpicking comment",
|
|
"pending_review": "",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files/reviews/submit", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"commit_id": doc.GetInputValueByName("latest_commit_id"),
|
|
"content": "looks better",
|
|
"type": "comment",
|
|
})
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
// retrieve comment_id by reloading the comment page
|
|
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3")
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
doc = NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
commentIDs := doc.Find(`[data-action="Resolve"]`).Map(func(i int, elt *goquery.Selection) string {
|
|
v, _ := elt.Attr("data-comment-id")
|
|
return v
|
|
})
|
|
assert.Len(t, commentIDs, 2) // 1 for the outdated review, 1 for the current review
|
|
|
|
// check that the first comment is for the previous review
|
|
comment := loadComment(t, commentIDs[0])
|
|
assert.Equal(t, comment.ReviewID, firstReviewID)
|
|
|
|
// check that the second comment is for a different review
|
|
comment = loadComment(t, commentIDs[1])
|
|
assert.NotZero(t, comment.ReviewID)
|
|
assert.NotEqual(t, comment.ReviewID, firstReviewID)
|
|
|
|
commentID = commentIDs[1] // save commentID for later
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/user2/repo1/issues/resolve_conversation", map[string]string{
|
|
"_csrf": doc.GetInputValueByName("_csrf"),
|
|
"origin": "timeline",
|
|
"action": "Resolve",
|
|
"comment_id": commentID,
|
|
})
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
// even on template error, the page returns HTTP 200
|
|
// count the comments to ensure success.
|
|
doc = NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
comments := doc.Find(`.comments > .comment`)
|
|
assert.Len(t, comments.Nodes, 1) // the outdated comment belongs to another review and should not be shown
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Files Changed tab", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
for _, c := range []struct {
|
|
style, outdated string
|
|
expectedCount int
|
|
}{
|
|
{"unified", "true", 3}, // 1 comment on line 1 + 2 comments on line 3
|
|
{"unified", "false", 1}, // 1 comment on line 3 is not outdated
|
|
{"split", "true", 3}, // 1 comment on line 1 + 2 comments on line 3
|
|
{"split", "false", 1}, // 1 comment on line 3 is not outdated
|
|
} {
|
|
t.Run(c.style+"+"+c.outdated, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3/files?style="+c.style+"&show-outdated="+c.outdated)
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
doc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
comments := doc.Find(`.comments > .comment`)
|
|
assert.Len(t, comments.Nodes, c.expectedCount)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Conversation tab", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/user2/repo1/pulls/3")
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
doc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
comments := doc.Find(`.comments > .comment`)
|
|
assert.Len(t, comments.Nodes, 3) // 1 comment on line 1 + 2 comments on line 3
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestPullView_CodeOwner(t *testing.T) {
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
|
|
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
|
|
|
|
// Create the repo.
|
|
repo, err := repo_service.CreateRepositoryDirectly(db.DefaultContext, user2, user2, repo_service.CreateRepoOptions{
|
|
Name: "test_codeowner",
|
|
Readme: "Default",
|
|
AutoInit: true,
|
|
ObjectFormatName: git.Sha1ObjectFormat.Name(),
|
|
DefaultBranch: "master",
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// add CODEOWNERS to default branch
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(db.DefaultContext, repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
OldBranch: repo.DefaultBranch,
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
{
|
|
Operation: "create",
|
|
TreePath: "CODEOWNERS",
|
|
ContentReader: strings.NewReader("README.md @user5\n"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("First Pull Request", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// create a new branch to prepare for pull request
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(db.DefaultContext, repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
NewBranch: "codeowner-basebranch",
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
{
|
|
Operation: "update",
|
|
TreePath: "README.md",
|
|
ContentReader: strings.NewReader("# This is a new project\n"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Create a pull request.
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
|
|
testPullCreate(t, session, "user2", "test_codeowner", false, repo.DefaultBranch, "codeowner-basebranch", "Test Pull Request")
|
|
|
|
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{BaseRepoID: repo.ID, HeadRepoID: repo.ID, HeadBranch: "codeowner-basebranch"})
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsIf(t, true, &issues_model.Review{IssueID: pr.IssueID, Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest, ReviewerID: 5})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, pr.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext))
|
|
|
|
err := issue_service.ChangeTitle(db.DefaultContext, pr.Issue, user2, "[WIP] Test Pull Request")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
prUpdated1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: pr.ID})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, prUpdated1.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext))
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "[WIP] Test Pull Request", prUpdated1.Issue.Title)
|
|
|
|
err = issue_service.ChangeTitle(db.DefaultContext, prUpdated1.Issue, user2, "Test Pull Request2")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
prUpdated2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: pr.ID})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, prUpdated2.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext))
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "Test Pull Request2", prUpdated2.Issue.Title)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// change the default branch CODEOWNERS file to change README.md's codeowner
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(db.DefaultContext, repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
{
|
|
Operation: "update",
|
|
TreePath: "CODEOWNERS",
|
|
ContentReader: strings.NewReader("README.md @user8\n"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Second Pull Request", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// create a new branch to prepare for pull request
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(db.DefaultContext, repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
NewBranch: "codeowner-basebranch2",
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
{
|
|
Operation: "update",
|
|
TreePath: "README.md",
|
|
ContentReader: strings.NewReader("# This is a new project2\n"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Create a pull request.
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
|
|
testPullCreate(t, session, "user2", "test_codeowner", false, repo.DefaultBranch, "codeowner-basebranch2", "Test Pull Request2")
|
|
|
|
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{BaseRepoID: repo.ID, HeadBranch: "codeowner-basebranch2"})
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsIf(t, true, &issues_model.Review{IssueID: pr.IssueID, Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest, ReviewerID: 8})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Forked Repo Pull Request", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
user5 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 5})
|
|
forkedRepo, err := repo_service.ForkRepository(db.DefaultContext, user2, user5, repo_service.ForkRepoOptions{
|
|
BaseRepo: repo,
|
|
Name: "test_codeowner_fork",
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// create a new branch to prepare for pull request
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(db.DefaultContext, forkedRepo, user5, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
NewBranch: "codeowner-basebranch-forked",
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
{
|
|
Operation: "update",
|
|
TreePath: "README.md",
|
|
ContentReader: strings.NewReader("# This is a new forked project\n"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user5")
|
|
testPullCreate(t, session, "user5", "test_codeowner_fork", false, forkedRepo.DefaultBranch, "codeowner-basebranch-forked", "Test Pull Request2")
|
|
|
|
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{BaseRepoID: repo.ID, HeadBranch: "codeowner-basebranch-forked"})
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsIf(t, false, &issues_model.Review{IssueID: pr.IssueID, Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest, ReviewerID: 8})
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
}
|