Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mai-Lapyst
51735c415b Add support for workflow_dispatch (#3334)
Closes #2797

I'm aware of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28163 exists, but since I had it laying around on my drive and collecting dust, I might as well open a PR for it if anyone wants the feature a bit sooner than waiting for upstream to release it or to be a forgejo "native" implementation.

This PR Contains:
- Support for the `workflow_dispatch` trigger
- Inputs: boolean, string, number, choice

Things still to be done:
- [x] API Endpoint `/api/v1/<org>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<workflow id>/dispatches`
- ~~Fixing some UI bugs I had no time figuring out, like why dropdown/choice inputs's menu's behave weirdly~~ Unrelated visual bug with dropdowns inside dropdowns
- [x] Fix bug where opening the branch selection submits the form
- [x] Limit on inputs to render/process

Things not in this PR:
- Inputs: environment (First need support for environments in forgejo)

Things needed to test this:
- A patch for https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner to actually consider the inputs inside the workflow.
  ~~One possible patch can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/Mai-Lapyst/runner/src/branch/support-workflow-inputs~~
  [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)

![image](/attachments/2db50c9e-898f-41cb-b698-43edeefd2573)

## Testing

- Checkout PR
- Setup new development runner with [this PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)
- Create a repo with a workflow (see below)
- Go to the actions tab, select the workflow and see the notice as in the screenshot above
- Use the button + dropdown to run the workflow
  - Try also running it via the api using the `` endpoint
- ...
- Profit!

<details>
<summary>Example workflow</summary>

```yaml
on:
  workflow_dispatch:
    inputs:
      logLevel:
        description: 'Log Level'
        required: true
        default: 'warning'
        type: choice
        options:
        - info
        - warning
        - debug
      tags:
        description: 'Test scenario tags'
        required: false
        type: boolean
      boolean_default_true:
        description: 'Test scenario tags'
        required: true
        type: boolean
        default: true
      boolean_default_false:
        description: 'Test scenario tags'
        required: false
        type: boolean
        default: false
      number1_default:
        description: 'Number w. default'
        default: '100'
        type: number
      number2:
        description: 'Number w/o. default'
        type: number
      string1_default:
        description: 'String w. default'
        default: 'Hello world'
        type: string
      string2:
        description: 'String w/o. default'
        required: true
        type: string

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: docker
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: whoami
      - run: cat /etc/issue
      - run: uname -a
      - run: date
      - run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
      - run: echo ${{ inputs.tags }}
      - env:
          GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
        run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT"
      - run: echo "abc"
```
</details>

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3334
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-06-28 05:17:11 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
97292da960
Fix schedule tasks bugs (#28691)
Fix #28157 

This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.

## The Changes

- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
2024-01-12 21:50:38 +00:00
Zettat123
9a8af92577
Fix the bug when getting files changed for pull_request_target event (#26320)
Follow #25229

Copy from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26290#issuecomment-1663135186

The bug is that we cannot get changed files for the
`pull_request_target` event. This event runs in the context of the base
branch, so we won't get any changes if we call
`GetFilesChangedSinceCommit` with `PullRequest.Base.Ref`.
2023-08-05 14:26:06 +08:00
Zettat123
7586b5815a
Fix activity type match in matchPullRequestEvent (#25746)
Fix #25736 
Caused by #24048

Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when
`types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow
only specifies filters but no `types` like this:
```
on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
```
the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of
`[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this
case.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-07 16:30:07 +00:00
Zettat123
48e5a74f21
Support pull_request_target event (#25229)
Fix #25088

This PR adds the support for
[`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target)
workflow trigger. `pull_request_target` is similar to `pull_request`,
but the workflow triggered by the `pull_request_target` event runs in
the context of the base branch of the pull request rather than the head
branch. Since the workflow from the base is considered trusted, it can
access the secrets and doesn't need approvals to run.
2023-06-26 14:33:18 +08:00
Zettat123
5eb4c63867
Support triggering workflows by wiki related events (#24119)
This PR is to support triggering workflows by wiki related events like
creating, editing or deleting wiki pages. In GitHub, this event is
called
[gollum](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#gollum)
2023-04-17 13:49:47 -04:00
Zettat123
2d91afaa92
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types (#24048)
Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as
`issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can
trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation:
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly
because we don't check the activity types. For example,
`pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a
`pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use
`pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the
activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be
triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to
improve the match logic.

- [x] [`issues`
](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues)
- [x]
[`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment)
- [x]
[`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request)
- [x]
[`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review)
- [x]
[`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment)
- [x]
[`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release)
- [x]
[`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)
2023-04-12 12:16:47 -04:00