Fixes: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1079
What do you think about using a consistent `woodpecker` color scheme?
Right now, the `lime` color scheme from windicss is used that does not
really fit the primary color used for the documentation website. I have
used the primary color `#4CAF50` from the docs and created a color
palette with https://palettte.app/:
<details>
<summary>JSON source</summary>
```Json
[
{
"paletteName": "New Palette",
"swatches": [
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "166E30"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "248438"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "369943"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "4CAF50"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "68C464"
},
{
"name": "New Swatch",
"color": "8AD97F"
}
]
}
]
```
</details>
I have added this color scheme to the windicss config and replaced the
use of `lime` in the UI. While `woodpecker-300` would be the primary
color that is used for the docs, I currently use `woodpecke-400` as
primary color for the UI to fix some contrast issues.
What do you think? If you would like to stay with the current colors,
that's fine for me, I can just use the custom CSS feature in this case.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Related-to: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/2078
Remaining CVEs:
```
❯ trivy fs --exit-code 1 --skip-dirs node_modules/,plugins/woodpecker-plugins/node_modules/ docs/
2023-08-01T10:02:36.911+0200 INFO Vulnerability scanning is enabled
2023-08-01T10:02:36.911+0200 INFO Secret scanning is enabled
2023-08-01T10:02:36.911+0200 INFO If your scanning is slow, please try '--scanners vuln' to disable secret scanning
2023-08-01T10:02:36.911+0200 INFO Please see also https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy/v0.43/docs/scanner/secret/#recommendation for faster secret detection
2023-08-01T10:02:36.963+0200 INFO Number of language-specific files: 1
2023-08-01T10:02:36.963+0200 INFO Detecting pnpm vulnerabilities...
pnpm-lock.yaml (pnpm)
Total: 2 (UNKNOWN: 0, LOW: 0, MEDIUM: 1, HIGH: 1, CRITICAL: 0)
┌─────────┬────────────────┬──────────┬───────────────────┬────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Library │ Vulnerability │ Severity │ Installed Version │ Fixed Version │ Title │
├─────────┼────────────────┼──────────┼───────────────────┼────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ got │ CVE-2022-33987 │ MEDIUM │ 9.6.0 │ 11.8.5, 12.1.0 │ missing verification of requested URLs allows redirects to │
│ │ │ │ │ │ UNIX sockets │
│ │ │ │ │ │ https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2022-33987 │
├─────────┼────────────────┼──────────┼───────────────────┼────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ trim │ CVE-2020-7753 │ HIGH │ 0.0.1 │ 0.0.3 │ nodejs-trim: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in │
│ │ │ │ │ │ trim function │
│ │ │ │ │ │ https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2020-7753 │
└─────────┴────────────────┴──────────┴───────────────────┴────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
- `trim` is pulled in by `@docusaurus/theme-classic` and can be ignored
due to
https://github.com/facebook/docusaurus/issues/7275#issuecomment-1113997259
- `got` can be ignored as well, see `trim`
error logs like:
```
{"level":"warn","error":"sql: no rows in result set","time":"2023-07-25T21:29:56Z"}
```
have to less context to be helpfull.
this will cange it as the message now looks like:
```
{"level":"warn","error":"GetPipelineLast: sql: no rows in result set", "time":"2023-07-27T02:54:25+02:00"}
```
Various ways to factor out common data in a pipeline file - having them
in one place rather than spread out over many pages, will help newbies
like me.
closes#1743
fixes: setting secrets for own user namespace
- create org in database
- use orgID for org related APIs
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
